And liberals will lose their collective minds lmao.
Who will replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ?
- Thread starter General Malaise
- Start date
DrBleachCocktail
.44 mag
So be it. Liberals are the ones who put laws that ruins the state than leave to a free state just to repeat the process.
spat
.950 JDJ
That happened a long time ago.
Their problem is that they've already gone all in on violence and fabricated evidence. They've got nothing left to threaten with.
The Left: "We'll burn it all down"
Portland & Kenosha: "You can’t burn ashes"
Once you are all in, you can no longer raise.
byron
.308 Win
O bummer did name one Merrick Garland the GOP just didn't act upon him.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
masterswimmer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
The left promised an impeachment of Trump before he was even inaugurated.
The left fabricated charges of Russian election interference.
The left orchestrated Ukrainian collusion.
The left delivered a Presidential impeachment based on their fraudulent and corrupt charges.
The left has continuously stonewalled any and every action President Trump has attempted to implement to further the American way of life.
The left has obstructed everything the Trump administration does, just because it is Trump behind it.
The left has never, not for one second, allowed any sort of advancement for our country since President Trump has taken office. This includes promoting and endorsing the fabricated character assassination of Justice Kavanaugh, the burning down, rioting, and looting of American cities, the murder of Trump supporting citizens, the murder of police officers, and last but absolutely not the least, the call for civil war if Trump wins reelection.
Now the left is appealing to the right to hold off appointing a replacement SCOTUS Justice until after the election?
The right needs to spell it out in no uncertain terms by telling the left very clearly to go fuck themselves sideways in Macy's window.
There hasn't been one single solitary moment the left has played fair with Trump, yet they want fair play now. Tell them to put their request in writing. Have the drunkard Pelosi hand deliver the request to Trump in the Oval Office on national television so Trump can tear up the request on national television just like the bitch did to Trump's SOTU address.
The left fabricated charges of Russian election interference.
The left orchestrated Ukrainian collusion.
The left delivered a Presidential impeachment based on their fraudulent and corrupt charges.
The left has continuously stonewalled any and every action President Trump has attempted to implement to further the American way of life.
The left has obstructed everything the Trump administration does, just because it is Trump behind it.
The left has never, not for one second, allowed any sort of advancement for our country since President Trump has taken office. This includes promoting and endorsing the fabricated character assassination of Justice Kavanaugh, the burning down, rioting, and looting of American cities, the murder of Trump supporting citizens, the murder of police officers, and last but absolutely not the least, the call for civil war if Trump wins reelection.
Now the left is appealing to the right to hold off appointing a replacement SCOTUS Justice until after the election?
The right needs to spell it out in no uncertain terms by telling the left very clearly to go fuck themselves sideways in Macy's window.
There hasn't been one single solitary moment the left has played fair with Trump, yet they want fair play now. Tell them to put their request in writing. Have the drunkard Pelosi hand deliver the request to Trump in the Oval Office on national television so Trump can tear up the request on national television just like the bitch did to Trump's SOTU address.
RGB, YOU GO GIRL !
got yer wish ....
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
After what happened with Kavanaugh, I really hope she stone walls the dems during hearings and treats them with the distain and contempt they deserve. Like cold heartedly so. Why not? It's not like they are going to vote for her anyway. Fuck them.
Gonna be hard to come up with shit on her. I believe she’s got a few adopted kids from somewhere else - of color, if I remember correctly.
Yes 2 adopted kids from Haiti amongst others
www.forbes.com
Reports: Trump Picks Amy Coney Barrett As Supreme Court Nominee
The judge has articulated anti-abortion views, and is a member of the Catholic group People of Praise, which has been criticized as having an authoritarian structure.
www.forbes.com
Arjuna
.338 Win Mag
Yes 2 adopted kids from Haiti amongst others
Reports: Trump Picks Amy Coney Barrett As Supreme Court Nominee
The judge has articulated anti-abortion views, and is a member of the Catholic group People of Praise, which has been criticized as having an authoritarian structure.
Glad he took fake racist and misogynist claims out of the equation. Should be a shoe in because that’s all the Dems had last time around.
spat
.950 JDJ
I will say this. The Republicans should have brought Garland to a vote.
They should have voted "No", but they should have voted.
Maybe McConnell was afraid he had too many RINO's to allow it, I'm not sure.
spat
.950 JDJ
She is probably the best pick regardless. The added bonus is that he’s replacing a female with a female.
Catskillkid
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Agreed. I often wondered why they didn't just hold a vote and watch it be voted down. Would've saved a whole lot of trouble now since it makes the Republicans look hypocritical now.
He probably figured Collins and Murkowski would fold like the cheap pant suits they are.
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
I think playing fair and by the book has brought us nothing. The dems would not have brought it to a vote if the situation was flipped. Taking the high road gets you a loss against someone who wants nothing but power and will stop at nothing to get it.
Big difference. Voters rejected a D senate. They instilled a R senate to block such things. This time we have the R president and R senate. Different story if the senate was D this time around. Therefore it is moot.
spat
.950 JDJ
Oh, certainly the makeup of the Senate is absolutely different here.
And I'm not suggesting they should have confirmed Garland.
I'm just saying they should have given him a hard "NO" instead of hiding behind procedural BS.
However, if McConnell thought that there might actually be enough RINO's to confirm Garland, then he made the right move.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
Amy 50BMG Barrett .. you can't Trump this pick 
FrankenCub
.338 Win Mag
Corrected your typo.
Shadow2
6.5 Creedmoor
Originalist? Textualist? ... you mean your suppose to interpret the constitution for what it says and actually means. THATS CRAZY TALK
Elwood
.223 Rem
Pirro for SCOTUS 2020.
Watching liberals go batshit -priceless
Watching liberals go batshit -priceless
Agree 100%.....
You win the internet today!
And when Pelosi delivers that letter to the Oval office, tell her to bring a cigar.