I have, reluctantly, utilized the NYS ammo background check as I sorely needed ammo for competition and didn't have time to drive 3 hours for the alternative.
1st time, while buying a new gun, ammo check went right through instantly.
2nd time, just buying ammo, resulted in a 20 minute delay...
So re-enacting storage laws, after being ruled un-Constitutional, is WILLFUL infringement of rights under color of law.
the DoJ should be marching into NY and arresting those who voted for it and signed it.
But, as usual, they are afraid of NY and do absolutely nothing.
Only if they finally do what is necessary.
Start arresting politicians who violate Rights under color of Law.
Once most of the new york legislature is in prison things can be cleaned up.
Unless I missed it, I'm surprised no one has commented on the fact that the headline got it right, instead of the usual inanimate object blaming.
"Assault suspect..."
Since NY loves to tax retroactively, does this mean I'll get a full refund for the money I spent at Community College to get my degree?
(I already know the answer is "no".)
I saw this post on Farcebook this morning:
More information is coming out about the deadly school shooting at an elementary school in Bend, Oregon, including new details about the armed citizen who stopped the shooter.
Police say an armed community member saw the perpetrator enter the school...
She's not a democrat. Therefore I will vote for her.
Most likely. But not necessarily due to how PEOPLE vote. Dominion is a whole different issue.
In New York none of that is actually a mark of intelligence. This is one of the woke capitals of the Country. I would have serious doubts...
Of course they are. They think they can scare people into compliance.
As usual they fail to realize what happens when you push someone proficient with their arms into defending themselves and their loved ones, or even just pushing them past the point where pesky things like "laws" no longer...
you said it yourself, in a round about way.
They latch on to these ridiculous and absurd ideas because it reinforces their own bias and beliefs. The "Koolaid drinkers" effectively "prove" the righteousness of their own fantasy land by spewing out lies that they, and others, can take as "truth".
How far does that precedence go?
If his direct superior court has a set precedence requiring him to rule one way, but THAT court's superior court has precedence that requires them, and every court below them, to rule the other way?
What's the point of the system if a court can ignore the...