spat's latest activity
-
spat replied to the thread Political Picture thread. (humor/memes/etc).Maybe we should start referring to illegals as "colonizers". Some of the lefties might start to get the message. -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
99% chance AI. She may lean that way but will never be that open about it.
-
spat reacted to REF's post in the thread SAF Amicus (Supreme Court case could restore gun rights - Hawaii 'vampire rule' with
Like.
Seems to me , and anyone with even a fiber of common sense, that this one is a “ no brainer”. But we all know how that works out for us. -
spat replied to the thread Trump admin is DEFENDING the archaic National Firearms Act of 1934.NO. That is the antithesis of everything the US stands for. *THE PEOPLE* are the boss. The government, to include SCOTUS, exists for...
-
spat reacted to fresch's post in the thread Trump admin is DEFENDING the archaic National Firearms Act of 1934 with Like.
This is too hard to understand? A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to...
-
spat reacted to Tisto's post in the thread Trump admin is DEFENDING the archaic National Firearms Act of 1934 with Like.
This explains your post very well. Maybe a couple other people will watch this and understand. Maybe not.
-
spat replied to the thread Trump admin is DEFENDING the archaic National Firearms Act of 1934.Citing the decisions of a court that has gotten so much wrong in the past isn't convincing. The 2A says what it says, regardless of who...
-
spat reacted to Darth's post in the thread Trump admin is DEFENDING the archaic National Firearms Act of 1934 with Like.
I'll keep that in mind for when I'm discussing militias. The 2A does not discuss the rights of the militia.