DOJ Releases 3.5 million Pages, Images, Videos and Files of Epstein Material
- Thread starter livingston
- Start date
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Career Over…
Only well played if it is 1) real, 2) actually traps someone, and 3) THEY PROSECUTE THAT PERSON!
Right now all three are questionable. However #3 is the most questionable of all since this administration is pathologically incapable of actually arresting or prosecuting anyone.
Just looking at the thumbnail for that video makes me think "clickbait nonsense".
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Thomas Massie Accuses Four Random, Innocent Men of Being Pedophiles and Sex Traffickers, Because Their Names Appeared in Epstein Files - The Last Refuge
Political operatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna have never mentioned the name Katheryn Ruemmler despite her name appearing thousands of times in emails within the Epstein files. Yet both Massie and Khanna went out of their way to publicly claim they forced the DOJ to release the names of four...
theconservativetreehouse.com
Thomas Massie Accuses Four Random, Innocent Men of Being Pedophiles and Sex Traffickers, Because Their Names Appeared in Epstein Files
Political operatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna have never mentioned the name Katheryn Ruemmler despite her name appearing thousands of times in emails within the Epstein files. Yet both Massie and Khanna went out of their way to publicly claim they forced the DOJ to release the names of four men they accused of being sex traffickers and pedophiles.Massie was very proud of his efforts to discover the names and force the DOJ to unredact them. As Massie proclaimed, continuously: if President Trump and the DOJ did not publicly unredact the names, it would be proof that President Trump and the DOJ were protecting pedophiles and sex traffickers.
After holding their joint press conference, Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna then went to the House of Representatives to proclaim (1) Salvatore Nuara, (2) Zurab Mikeladze, (3) Leonid Leonov and (4) Nicola Caputo were sexual deviants, pedophiles and much worse. They were horrible men who had abused underage girls.
…. Except, there was a problem. A BIG PROBLEM.
Salvatore Nuara, Zurab Mikeladze, Leonid Leonov and Nicola Caputo had absolutely nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein or anything even remotely associated with Jeffrey Epstein. [SEE HERE]
The names Salvatore Nuara, Zurab Mikeladze, Leonid Leonov and Nicola Caputo were in the Epstein files because they were random pictures of men, random passport pictures, used in a photo lineup during questioning of one of Epstein’s victims.
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
PAM BONDI JUST PLAYED THE GREATEST TRAP IN POLITICAL HISTORY.
And Congress walked right into it.
Yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi sat before the House Judiciary Committee. Standard oversight hearing. Routine questions.
Then she pulled out a document.
Labeled: "Jayapal Pramila — Search History."
The room went SILENT.
The DOJ gave Congress access to the unredacted Epstein files this week. Every member got their own login. Their own computer. Their own session.
What Congress didn't know?
The DOJ was tracking EVERY SINGLE SEARCH.
Every name they looked up.
Every document they opened.
Every file they downloaded.
ALL OF IT. LOGGED.
And Bondi brought the receipts to the hearing.
PANIC WAS INSTANT
Rep. Jayapal called it "spying on members of Congress."
Rep. Raskin accused Bondi of "blatant abuse of power."
Rep. Moskowitz said it was "suspicious and inappropriate."
They're FURIOUS.
But here's the question nobody in the media is asking:
Why are they so scared of their search history?
If you're searching for evidence of crimes against children, you'd be PROUD of that search history.
Unless you're not searching for evidence.
Unless you're searching for YOUR OWN NAME.
THE GENIUS OF THE TRAP
Think about it.
Bondi didn't just release the files.
She released them on MONITORED COMPUTERS.
Every Congress member who rushed to search the files just told the DOJ exactly:
• WHO they're trying to protect
• WHAT names they're worried about
• WHICH connections they're trying to verify
The ones searching for "flights to the island" = investigators.
The ones searching for SPECIFIC NAMES = protectors.
Bondi now knows who's investigating and who's COVERING UP.
And she showed them she knows.
In front of cameras.
With a smile.
THE DHS SHUTDOWN — PERFECT TIMING
While Congress panics about their search history, DHS is shutting down SATURDAY.
Democrats blocked the funding bill. House members already left Washington.
The same week Congress gets caught searching Epstein files — they REFUSE to fund the department that investigates trafficking?
They're not defunding DHS to save money.
They're defunding it to STOP INVESTIGATIONS.
CONNECT THE DOTS
Monday: Congress gets Epstein file access.
Tuesday: Members frantically search for names.
Wednesday: Bondi reveals she tracked everything.
Thursday: Democrats block DHS funding.
Friday: Government shutdown begins.
Five days. One pattern. PANIC.
They walked into the hearing thinking they were in control.
They walked out knowing Bondi has EVERYTHING.
Every search. Every name. Every cover-up attempt.
Logged. Documented.
The hunter became the hunted.
And they did it to themselves.
And Congress walked right into it.
Yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi sat before the House Judiciary Committee. Standard oversight hearing. Routine questions.
Then she pulled out a document.
Labeled: "Jayapal Pramila — Search History."
The room went SILENT.
The DOJ gave Congress access to the unredacted Epstein files this week. Every member got their own login. Their own computer. Their own session.
What Congress didn't know?
The DOJ was tracking EVERY SINGLE SEARCH.
Every name they looked up.
Every document they opened.
Every file they downloaded.
ALL OF IT. LOGGED.
And Bondi brought the receipts to the hearing.
PANIC WAS INSTANT
Rep. Jayapal called it "spying on members of Congress."
Rep. Raskin accused Bondi of "blatant abuse of power."
Rep. Moskowitz said it was "suspicious and inappropriate."
They're FURIOUS.
But here's the question nobody in the media is asking:
Why are they so scared of their search history?
If you're searching for evidence of crimes against children, you'd be PROUD of that search history.
Unless you're not searching for evidence.
Unless you're searching for YOUR OWN NAME.
THE GENIUS OF THE TRAP
Think about it.
Bondi didn't just release the files.
She released them on MONITORED COMPUTERS.
Every Congress member who rushed to search the files just told the DOJ exactly:
• WHO they're trying to protect
• WHAT names they're worried about
• WHICH connections they're trying to verify
The ones searching for "flights to the island" = investigators.
The ones searching for SPECIFIC NAMES = protectors.
Bondi now knows who's investigating and who's COVERING UP.
And she showed them she knows.
In front of cameras.
With a smile.
THE DHS SHUTDOWN — PERFECT TIMING
While Congress panics about their search history, DHS is shutting down SATURDAY.
Democrats blocked the funding bill. House members already left Washington.
The same week Congress gets caught searching Epstein files — they REFUSE to fund the department that investigates trafficking?
They're not defunding DHS to save money.
They're defunding it to STOP INVESTIGATIONS.
CONNECT THE DOTS
Monday: Congress gets Epstein file access.
Tuesday: Members frantically search for names.
Wednesday: Bondi reveals she tracked everything.
Thursday: Democrats block DHS funding.
Friday: Government shutdown begins.
Five days. One pattern. PANIC.
They walked into the hearing thinking they were in control.
They walked out knowing Bondi has EVERYTHING.
Every search. Every name. Every cover-up attempt.
Logged. Documented.
The hunter became the hunted.
And they did it to themselves.
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
Nah, doesn't matter who they search. It doesn't implicate them in anything. Curiosity is not a crime, it's not even unethical.
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
They "doth protest too much, methinks" is a famous line from Shakespeare's Hamlet (Act 3, Scene 2), spoken by Queen Gertrude. It signifies that these mother-fuckers over-the-top, frequent, or excessive denials of something suggest they are actually guilty or hiding the truth. It implies that the strength of their claim is insincere and a number of them got caught with their hand in the cookie jar. None of this means squat until there is some long overdue accountability.
The fact that they looked at the documents they were given to look at doesn't implicate or vindicate them in anything. That is immaterial even if they are scum of the earth.
The bad part, there was no attempt to investigate anything beyond what was already known.