Obama-Appointed Judge Strikes Down Trump Order Requiring Proof of Citizenship to Vote in U.S. Elections

How can this even be? How can we not require this? It never made sense to me.

It isn't permanent, the bitch is just a Massachusetts Federal District Judge.

Any ruling issued by a District of Massachusetts judge (by definition a lower court) is not necessarily the final word. As the next, and not even the final step, the federal government can immediately seek an emergency stay and file an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to have the ruling overturned or restricted.

My guess ... Trump will take the issue to the streets outside the beltway to force the Rinos and Dems to fold and pass legislation for this since it is polled as an easy 80/20 issue among any and every demographic checked ... he can't lose.

Here's a picture of severe TDS, I mean, Obama-appointed judge Indira Talwani.




There seems to be a pattern with this one.


- On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14165 which orders the termination of the parole program known as the "Processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans.
- On April 9, 2025, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani indicated that she will "stay revocation of parole" for those currently in the program.

- Talwani blocked Trump administration from revoking immigration parole by issuing a temporary restraining order that extends the “family reunification parole” status of immigrants who were set to see it expire on January 14, 2026 as part of the administration’s broad crackdown on immigration.

- On July 28, 2025, Talwani ordered the Trump administration to continue Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood, blocking enforcement of that provision of the "One Big Beautiful Bill" signed earlier that month. Talwani's ruling kept Planned Parenthood funded for six weeks, until the 1st Circuit permitted the Trump administration to end Planned Parenthood funding in September.

- On June 25, 26 Talwani blocked Trump's attempt to force individual States to release their voting roles, using the post office to threaten to refuse delivery of votes by mail. In a 37 page ruling she stated that “The Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections.”

Fraud doesn't exist if you don't catch it.

Too bad a "greater" court can't rule that local district court judges don't have the authority to interfere on a nationwide basis.


oh, wait...

Grimscale said:

Too bad a "greater" court can't rule that local district court judges don't have the authority to interfere on a nationwide basis.


oh, wait...

Click to expand...

Democrats do not operate within the law. They think the law pertains to everyone but themselves. And by the looks of things, they might be right...