Do you realize how crushing these 2 Supreme Court rulings are for the Left’s sabotage machine?

L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
53,534
Reaction score
145,568
Location
livingston county

Do you realize how crushing these 2 Supreme Court rulings are for the Left’s sabotage machine?​


The left wing has worked hard to find very clever ways to stop President Trump’s agenda without ever winning an election.
The formula was sinister and simple. Trump announces a new immigration policy. That cues progressive activist groups to race to court and file a lawsuit. A friendly federal activist judge somewhere in California, Hawaii, or D.C. slaps an injunction on the policy, and just like that, everything grinds to a screeching halt. The left is hoping that months drag on and turn into years, letting the lawsuits pile up, and hopefully the policy dies a slow, lonely death before the American people ever get to see if it works.
This was the Left’s weaponized political strategy, and for a while, it worked. It stalled Trump’s agenda, tied up his policies, and gave activists more time to fight every move in court.

But under the left’s plan, one activist judge could overrule the executive branch and leave Americans wondering who was actually running the country: the guy they voted for or unelected radical judges?

for years the Ninth Circuit blocked every TPS termination.. every metering policy.. every turnback order.. judges in San Francisco and D.C. issued injunctions the same week DHS tried to enforce anything..
that was the strategy.. not the law.. the injunctions..

on June 25, 2026.. SCOTUS ruled 6-3 in two separate cases.. same day.. same margin.. both times..


revolver.news

Do you realize how crushing these 2 Supreme Court rulings are for the Left’s sabotage machine? - Revolver News

The Supreme Court holds up the America First agenda.
revolver.news revolver.news
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
31,866
Reaction score
67,569
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
Grimscale said:
Didn't SCOTUS rule against tyranny from the district courts before? And it's been completely ignored.
Why would the Dems, and their minions in the courts, be any different now?
Click to expand...
Until SCOTUS actually starts policing those courts and removing those judges nothing will change.

It's like having a shop lifting policy where "if you give it back all is forgiven".
 
Steal2B

Steal2B

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
87,260
Location
Dutchess County
TDS infected deep state Roberts will make sure there are going to be SCOTUS decisions that will screw with Trump no mater what the law actually reads, what linguistic gymnastics will be used to justify the twisted decision or how it will ultimately screw the average tax paying American citizen.
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
53,534
Reaction score
145,568
Location
livingston county
The Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 in favor of Mississippi -vs- RNC that state legislature can decide how long after election day that qualified election ballots cast may be received. [PDF HERE] Essentially, federal election day is election day, but ballots can be received after election day for the length of time determined by state law.

The Hight Court outlined that congress could change the ability of the states by changing the statutory language of the federal election law to require ballots be received by election day. As long as federal law does not outline the deadline for ballot reception, states can extend that process at their legislative discretion. THIS IS A HOT MESS FUBAR!

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/supreme-court-justices-2023.jpg
theconservativetreehouse.com

Supreme Court Rules States Can Decide How Long After Election Day Ballots May Be Received - The Last Refuge

The Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 in favor of Mississippi -vs- RNC that state legislature can decide how long after election day that qualified election ballots cast may be received. [PDF HERE] Essentially, federal election day is election day, but ballots can be received after election day for...
theconservativetreehouse.com theconservativetreehouse.com
 
Defilade

Defilade

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
27,948
Reaction score
39,304
Location
Elsewhere
livingston said:
The Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 in favor of Mississippi -vs- RNC that state legislature can decide how long after election day that qualified election ballots cast may be received. [PDF HERE] Essentially, federal election day is election day, but ballots can be received after election day for the length of time determined by state law.

The Hight Court outlined that congress could change the ability of the states by changing the statutory language of the federal election law to require ballots be received by election day. As long as federal law does not outline the deadline for ballot reception, states can extend that process at their legislative discretion. THIS IS A HOT MESS FUBAR!

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/supreme-court-justices-2023.jpg
theconservativetreehouse.com

Supreme Court Rules States Can Decide How Long After Election Day Ballots May Be Received - The Last Refuge

The Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 in favor of Mississippi -vs- RNC that state legislature can decide how long after election day that qualified election ballots cast may be received. [PDF HERE] Essentially, federal election day is election day, but ballots can be received after election day for...
theconservativetreehouse.com theconservativetreehouse.com
Click to expand...
So they ruled and left a gray area to allow for corruption? Seem about right coming out of that bunch of do nothings. What a shitshow!
 
Steal2B

Steal2B

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
87,260
Location
Dutchess County
livingston said:
The Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 in favor of Mississippi -vs- RNC that state legislature can decide how long after election day that qualified election ballots cast may be received. [PDF HERE] Essentially, federal election day is election day, but ballots can be received after election day for the length of time determined by state law.

The Hight Court outlined that congress could change the ability of the states by changing the statutory language of the federal election law to require ballots be received by election day. As long as federal law does not outline the deadline for ballot reception, states can extend that process at their legislative discretion. THIS IS A HOT MESS FUBAR!

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/supreme-court-justices-2023.jpg
theconservativetreehouse.com

Supreme Court Rules States Can Decide How Long After Election Day Ballots May Be Received - The Last Refuge

The Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 in favor of Mississippi -vs- RNC that state legislature can decide how long after election day that qualified election ballots cast may be received. [PDF HERE] Essentially, federal election day is election day, but ballots can be received after election day for...
theconservativetreehouse.com theconservativetreehouse.com
Click to expand...
Screenshot_20260629_143144_Chrome.jpg
www.foxnews.com

Conservatives revolt after Trump-appointed Barrett joins liberals in ‘shockingly wrong’ mail ballot ruling

Amy Coney Barrett faces conservative backlash after authoring the 5-4 Supreme Court ruling allowing mail-in ballots received after Election Day.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
DoD1776

DoD1776

NYGF's own Whippersnapper !
U.S. Military
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
5,170
Location
NYistan
Criticalt

Criticalt

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,932
Reaction score
17,028
Location
WNY
DoD1776 said:
You're watching the 2026 election being stolen in real time, while our Senate does absolutely nothing.

We should be furious.
Click to expand...
Many of us here have been furious many times over the years.
Hell, ive been voting sinse long before you were born.
The first time I voted was in the 102nd US congress midterms in 1990.
In 1994 we elected George Pataki for NYS governor, beating Mario Cuomo, and having our first Republican governor in over a decade. A lot of good that did!!
Thats probably when me being furious started. Things started good with Patski. He lowered crime every year for a decade, he lowered taxes for some, then he petered out. Instead of being a raging force like Mario was for the democrats, Pataki was a pussy who assured our state would be run by democrats forever more!
Every election sinse has made me furious....until Trump in 2016. I regained some hope, until the public got dumber, and the democrats became woke.
But, I have a tiny bit of hope over the last few months. Now that the socialist/communist are taking over the democratic party, we have hope.
I just saw where 14 NYS democrat congress people voiced their extreme anger over the Mundani supported communists running in 2026. The VAST majority of the democratic party are NOT going to vote for defunding the police, opening the borders, and handing out money to illegals.
Have some hope, the democrats just MIGHT truly destroy themselves this time!

Wheeew...I just woke up! I dreamt I thought the Republicans had a fighting chance in the midterms. I need to take a cold shower!!
 
Grimscale

Grimscale

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,541
Reaction score
16,752
Location
Rochester
livingston said:
how long after election day that qualified election ballots cast may be received.
Click to expand...
The key is "qualified election ballots".
So far, and as a result of this ruling, ballots that are postmarked by election day are valid. That's one of the most significant requirements.

Yes, it also means we NEED to have people at the polling places who can verify that ballots received fulfill the requirements for validity. That will only occur when those who assist fraud or block the poll watchers are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
If you hold up sheets of posterboard so people can't watch you count the ballots you are automatically guilty of election fraud. Guess what... LIFE SENTENCE!
Long past time to get serious about this shit.

DoD1776 said:
while our Senate does absolutely nothing.
Click to expand...
Exactly right.
Republicans have had something they rarely get. All three branches of .gov. WTF are they waiting for!
Thune should have been replaced MONTHS ago (preferably by prosecution, tar&feathering, and incarceration).
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
53,534
Reaction score
145,568
Location
livingston county
Grimscale said:
The key is "qualified election ballots".
So far, and as a result of this ruling, ballots that are postmarked by election day are valid. That's one of the most significant requirements.

Yes, it also means we NEED to have people at the polling places who can verify that ballots received fulfill the requirements for validity. That will only occur when those who assist fraud or block the poll watchers are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
If you hold up sheets of posterboard so people can't watch you count the ballots you are automatically guilty of election fraud. Guess what... LIFE SENTENCE!
Long past time to get serious about this shit.


Exactly right.
Republicans have had something they rarely get. All three branches of .gov. WTF are they waiting for!
Thune should have been replaced MONTHS ago (preferably by prosecution, tar&feathering, and incarceration).
Click to expand...
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
53,534
Reaction score
145,568
Location
livingston county
Folks
They say history repeats it self . Are we at the brink of that day on this fine morning . The save act is our last hope. It is possible with the election of communists in NY City some democrats would wake up and see the danger this country is in. ... And pass the save act. It is not that the liberals have perfected cheating ... There is a lot we can document. ... It is that liberals have packed the courts and we are blocked at every turn from having our day in court.
We have the case of Tina Peters being sentenced to 9 years for trying to bring this fraud to light. A harsher penalty than some murders received in that same court system . Stalin did the same thing to his political opponents ... And even worse. Give us 10 years. and we may have education camps up and running . . Canada has already started

Ontario court rules against Jordan Peterson, upholds social media training order​

An Ontario court ruled against psychologist and media personality Jordan Peterson Wednesday, and upheld a regulatory body's order that he take social media training in the wake of complaints about his controversial online posts and statements.

How many years before "social media training " gets transformed into the Canadian form of a Gulags ....
How many clerks will question an election irregularity after Tina's sentence ? Folks have we already passed this point before this ruling ? Fraud is in plain sight and we cannot do anything about it. ... The fear is too great.
Liberals have spelled out what their next step is if they take control ... Or should we say when they take control of the government. One would think that the court would have this in their mind in making this ruling yesterday ... Forced retirement and packing the court .
We already understand what comes next. .

?
 
SonOfSun

SonOfSun

.338 Win Mag
Messages
5,180
Reaction score
6,456
Location
WNY
livingston said:
Folks
They say history repeats it self . Are we at the brink of that day on this fine morning . The save act is our last hope. It is possible with the election of communists in NY City some democrats would wake up and see the danger this country is in. ... And pass the save act. It is not that the liberals have perfected cheating ... There is a lot we can document. ... It is that liberals have packed the courts and we are blocked at every turn from having our day in court.
We have the case of Tina Peters being sentenced to 9 years for trying to bring this fraud to light. A harsher penalty than some murders received in that same court system . Stalin did the same thing to his political opponents ... And even worse. Give us 10 years. and we may have education camps up and running . . Canada has already started

Ontario court rules against Jordan Peterson, upholds social media training order​

An Ontario court ruled against psychologist and media personality Jordan Peterson Wednesday, and upheld a regulatory body's order that he take social media training in the wake of complaints about his controversial online posts and statements.

How many years before "social media training " gets transformed into the Canadian form of a Gulags ....
How many clerks will question an election irregularity after Tina's sentence ? Folks have we already passed this point before this ruling ? Fraud is in plain sight and we cannot do anything about it. ... The fear is too great.
Liberals have spelled out what their next step is if they take control ... Or should we say when they take control of the government. One would think that the court would have this in their mind in making this ruling yesterday ... Forced retirement and packing the court .
We already understand what comes next. .

?
Click to expand...

I'd support the save act if and only if:

A. IDs are provided to all citizens 100% free of any fees or costs. Including providing any and all necessary transportation and job protected time off to complete the process.

B. The same barriers are removed from other rights. Ie. No fees for NICS background checks, etc.

This is for the same reason that poll taxes are illegal - it's illegal to place arbitrary fees between a citizen and their rights. If you are going to mandate a process at the governmental level related to rights, then that process should be protected and free from any and all personal costs, otherwise you are placing a fee as a gatekeeper to a right.
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
53,534
Reaction score
145,568
Location
livingston county
DoD1776 said:
Who’s ready to lose this ruling today? This Kangaroo court is going to screw us. Pray I’m wrong.
Click to expand...

BREAKING: Supreme Court Strikes Down President Trump’s Executive Order On Birthright Citizenship in 5-4 Decision – Roberts and Amy Coney Barret Side with Liberals​

Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion.

“Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause,” Roberts wrote.

Roberts was joined by Amy Coney Barrett, Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson.
www.thegatewaypundit.com

Supreme Court Strikes Down President Trump’s Executive Order On Birthright Citizenship in 5-4 Decision – Roberts and Amy Coney Barret Side with Liberals * The Gateway Pundit * by Cristina Laila

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship in a 5-4 decision.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com
 
Steal2B

Steal2B

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
87,260
Location
Dutchess County
livingston said:

BREAKING: Supreme Court Strikes Down President Trump’s Executive Order On Birthright Citizenship in 5-4 Decision – Roberts and Amy Coney Barret Side with Liberals​

Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion.

“Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause,” Roberts wrote.

Roberts was joined by Amy Coney Barrett, Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson.
www.thegatewaypundit.com

Supreme Court Strikes Down President Trump’s Executive Order On Birthright Citizenship in 5-4 Decision – Roberts and Amy Coney Barret Side with Liberals * The Gateway Pundit * by Cristina Laila

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship in a 5-4 decision.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com
Click to expand...
Pure TDS and not judicial. It was inevitable.

Roberts has TDS and I'd wager he is likely dirty on at least one of the accused issues rumored in democrat "Opposition Research". There is so much trash t's just a statistical probability and he'd be vulnerable to coercion.
 
Last edited:
pshift

pshift

.338 Win Mag
Messages
9,445
Reaction score
27,885
Location
90210
Criticalt said:
Many of us here have been furious many times over the years.
Hell, ive been voting sinse long before you were born.
The first time I voted was in the 102nd US congress midterms in 1990.
In 1994 we elected George Pataki for NYS governor, beating Mario Cuomo, and having our first Republican governor in over a decade. A lot of good that did!!
Thats probably when me being furious started. Things started good with Patski. He lowered crime every year for a decade, he lowered taxes for some, then he petered out. Instead of being a raging force like Mario was for the democrats, Pataki was a pussy who assured our state would be run by democrats forever more!
Every election sinse has made me furious....until Trump in 2016. I regained some hope, until the public got dumber, and the democrats became woke.
But, I have a tiny bit of hope over the last few months. Now that the socialist/communist are taking over the democratic party, we have hope.
I just saw where 14 NYS democrat congress people voiced their extreme anger over the Mundani supported communists running in 2026. The VAST majority of the democratic party are NOT going to vote for defunding the police, opening the borders, and handing out money to illegals.
Have some hope, the democrats just MIGHT truly destroy themselves this time!

Wheeew...I just woke up! I dreamt I thought the Republicans had a fighting chance in the midterms. I need to take a cold shower!!
Click to expand...
First time I voted was back in 1980. Did not like Mondale and did not trust JC.
 
Steal2B

Steal2B

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
87,260
Location
Dutchess County
pshift said:
First time I voted was back in 1980. Did not like Mondale and did not trust JC.
Click to expand...
You don't have to say it without saying it. It's OK to say you voted for Ronald Reagan (even if you mistakenly pulled the lever for Clark or Anderson)

Screenshot_20260630_131349_Chrome.jpg


In 1980 the US made a turn with Reagan. You chose well

Remember The 1980 hit "In America" it was a patriotic response to the widespread frustration and low national moral after Iran Hostage Crisis, the Watergate, double-digit inflation, weenie Jimmy Carter, and the morale decline after the Vietnam War. The song was an anthem of resilience, illustrating a struggling nation bouncing back and warning outside motherforkers that Americans would stick together and defend their own.


Playing it everyday this week. Happy Birthday America
 
Last edited:
DoD1776

DoD1776

NYGF's own Whippersnapper !
U.S. Military
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
5,170
Location
NYistan
livingston said:

BREAKING: Supreme Court Strikes Down President Trump’s Executive Order On Birthright Citizenship in 5-4 Decision – Roberts and Amy Coney Barret Side with Liberals​

Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion.

“Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause,” Roberts wrote.

Roberts was joined by Amy Coney Barrett, Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson.
www.thegatewaypundit.com

Supreme Court Strikes Down President Trump’s Executive Order On Birthright Citizenship in 5-4 Decision – Roberts and Amy Coney Barret Side with Liberals * The Gateway Pundit * by Cristina Laila

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship in a 5-4 decision.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com
Click to expand...
Fucking sacs of shit.
 
Steal2B

Steal2B

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
87,260
Location
Dutchess County
Screenshot_20260702_164910_Chrome.jpg
Kavanaugh said Trump couldn't use an executive order to change a law Congress had already passed, but instead suggested Congress could rewrite the law to limit birthright citizenship for children born to parents who are in the country illegally or temporarily.

"Congress could — consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment—amend §1401(a) or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country," he wrote.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top