Attorney General James Defends Age and Background Check Requirements for Semiautomatic Assault Rifle Sales
- Thread starter gunpoliticsny
- Start date
What the hell is she talking about? You can’t buy an assault rifle/weapon in NY. thanks to the NYAWB 2001 and the SAFE act 2013.
Need a list of domestic enemies? here is a start.....Attorneys General James in filing today’s amicus brief are the attorneys general of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and the District of Columbia
Need a list of domestic enemies? here is a start.....Attorneys General James in filing today’s amicus brief are the attorneys general of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and the District of Columbia
She's looking to spread the love around.
Joining Attorneys General James in filing today’s amicus brief are the attorneys general of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and the District of Columbia
Joining Attorneys General James in filing today’s amicus brief are the attorneys general of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and the District of Columbia
gunpoliticsny
6.5 Creedmoor
She's prepping for a gubernatorial run in '22.
Heck, she might even be eying a VP slot in '24.
Heck, she might even be eying a VP slot in '24.
ProgSpear
.338 Win Mag
Right. This will certainly deter the demographic segment that Matt Bracken termed “MUY’s” from doing any evil in the future.
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
There is NO SUCH THING as a "semiautomatic assault rifle." THE END.
Technically there is no such thing as an "assault rifle". That was a previous made-up term to scare the public into going along with a ban on full-auto firearms.
Just like there is no such thing as an "assault weapon".
But I'm starting to believe there are such things as "assault politicians". I think those should be banned.
Just like there is no such thing as an "assault weapon".
But I'm starting to believe there are such things as "assault politicians". I think those should be banned.
spat
.950 JDJ
There is an "assault rifle".
It is a *select fire* rifle in an intermediate caliber.
Assault weapon is the made up term, designed to cause confusion with actual assault rifles.
A semi-auto assault rifle would be like dehydrated water. The first half of the name precludes the second.
Uninformed and Compliant
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Doesn't matter, either way.
I'm so old, I remember when gun grabbers wanted to ban things because "they have no military application".
Now, they want to ban things because they DO have "military application".
These people are charlatans using falsehoods and excuses to disarm their intended victims. Nothing more.
I'm so old, I remember when gun grabbers wanted to ban things because "they have no military application".
Now, they want to ban things because they DO have "military application".
These people are charlatans using falsehoods and excuses to disarm their intended victims. Nothing more.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
More like lies around.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
Just like the ice age was coming right?
Military application has no bearing ...
The INDIVIDUAL Right was clearly defined and recognized in recent SCOTUS ruling.
The INDIVIDUAL is the fundamental criteria of the Bill of Rights to begin with. But really ... It is, whatever it is, because the scrutiny applied to the one Right that has the disclaimer "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" is anything but these days!...
So let the cards fall where they may. Let the overzealous frothing at the mouth liberals do their dirty work and trample upon those who cherish their freedoms above all else. Let the try and recreate things in their own ideology in spite of what others think, feel or want. It will all find it's balance in the end. The question is what will it take to unbalance the system and create a need for resettling...
It will happen, sooner or later, history has proven this time and again. It really is that simple.
The INDIVIDUAL Right was clearly defined and recognized in recent SCOTUS ruling.
The INDIVIDUAL is the fundamental criteria of the Bill of Rights to begin with. But really ... It is, whatever it is, because the scrutiny applied to the one Right that has the disclaimer "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" is anything but these days!...
So let the cards fall where they may. Let the overzealous frothing at the mouth liberals do their dirty work and trample upon those who cherish their freedoms above all else. Let the try and recreate things in their own ideology in spite of what others think, feel or want. It will all find it's balance in the end. The question is what will it take to unbalance the system and create a need for resettling...
It will happen, sooner or later, history has proven this time and again. It really is that simple.