keeping the Keys to spam cans handy.if that comes i will not just rain .. it will be a poring rain
Supposedly the Supreme Court will over turn roe v wade
- Thread starter Saltwater60
- Start date
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Nancy Pelosi: It's "Urgent" That We "Try To Improve" Supreme Court's Roe V. Wade Decision
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
EXACTLY!!!! This is nothing more than political bullshit , they are not going to overturn Roe wade. they need a reason for people to vote for them, and they created this ""crisis"" to get votes in the midterm period.
If they do over turn roe wade, which I doubt, think of the angry voters that will vote democratic , the dems have nothing else to offer.
they might just pull it off.
You are right they have nothing else but by then Gas maybe $7 gallon.. Don't think they can overcome with just that issue come Midterms.
pjzwtl
.308 Win
There are equal numbers of voters that vote based on an abortion stance it’s not the issue it’s made out to be.
Please sterilize yourself. I fully support this.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
It is a parasite, but you did it to yourself. I made two parasite with my wife and 15 and 18 years later they are still parasite.
My first son was born while my wife was at UB she made it work and completed her masters then later her PhD. She even had to bring my son to campus some days when I had to work and no one could watch him. Yes she breast fed him in class, pumped breast milk in the bathroom and stole red out some around UB’s campus. We did it and no offense to myself or her but we’re not miraculous in anyway.
View attachment code.MP4
Schumer Says Senate Will Vote Next Week to Codify Abortion Right into Federal Law
“They worked to take away the rights of women who simply want to make their own choices and not be told by some doctor, by some senator, some court justice how to treat their bodies”
Fine print: Unless it’s a vaccine…
Schumer Says Senate Will Vote Next Week to Codify Abortion Right into Federal Law
“They worked to take away the rights of women who simply want to make their own choices and not be told by some doctor, by some senator, some court justice how to treat their bodies”
Fine print: Unless it’s a vaccine…
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
Just playing devil's advocate here, but if they do this, I don't see it staving off a red wave. Quite the opposite actually.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
You under estimate the power of stupidity in large numbers.
Deplorable Me
.700 Nitro Express
The US is becoming tribal in its thinking process. Blindly tribal.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
Schumer Says Senate Will Vote Next Week to Codify Abortion Right into Federal Law and violates the The Declaration of Independence
"“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness.”"
FrankenCub
.338 Win Mag
The more I think about it, any having a pretty good idea where most of the abortions happen. I'm ok with it, really. Maybe it's doing humanity a bonus 
The thing is... a lot of these pro- voters were indicating they have had it with Dementia joe and the Ho and might actually vote red in Nov.
By releasing this "leak" these people have been galvanized to vote blue straight across the board. This actually does put the "red wave" that was initially predicted at risk.
It's not just about abortion. It's also about the Republican's constant attempts to codify their religion into Law and our government.
BerettaGuy
.308 Win
Well now!
This ain't gonna work too well in Illinois or New York now is it.
Looks like this has changed the "Hill to die on" from Twitter to I really don't know how to categorize it.
Anyway, you heard her. Lock and load and see you on that hill.
This ain't gonna work too well in Illinois or New York now is it.
Looks like this has changed the "Hill to die on" from Twitter to I really don't know how to categorize it.
Anyway, you heard her. Lock and load and see you on that hill.
BerettaGuy
.308 Win
You mean like it has been for over 300 years? Speaking of "religion being codified into law, don't forget about environmentalism, communism, liberalism, feminism, gayism, trannyism, pedoism, and the countless other isms the left worships and codifies into law. So you may be right! It's not just about abortion.
Modean
.223 Rem
Yes, the left is hard at work codifying their "religion" into law, and with much more success than the right. Given that the political pendulum always swings back the other way at some point, the left is due for some reversals as normies decide that they have had enough lunacy.
BerettaGuy
.308 Win
Being the cynic that I am, you can never convince me that the acknowledgment of the Hunter Biden Laptop story and the SCOTUS leak are not related.
The NY Times would not mention the laptop because it involved a "leak". Even though it did not involve a "leak".
Then a few weeks later, the "leak" of the century, and guess who is printing the story.
So my cynical question is, What did the NY Times know about the abortion leak, and "when" did they know it?
Democrats picked "slavery" to cause the first civil war are they picking abortion as the reason for the second? Or: will they twist it into being about all the other perversions they relish. Either way, enough talking. Let's get at it.
www.ocregister.com
The NY Times would not mention the laptop because it involved a "leak". Even though it did not involve a "leak".
Then a few weeks later, the "leak" of the century, and guess who is printing the story.
So my cynical question is, What did the NY Times know about the abortion leak, and "when" did they know it?
Democrats picked "slavery" to cause the first civil war are they picking abortion as the reason for the second? Or: will they twist it into being about all the other perversions they relish. Either way, enough talking. Let's get at it.
Finally, the New York Times acknowledges the truth about Hunter Biden
Maybe that’s because Hunter Biden doesn’t need their protection any more. All the federal prosecutors work for his dad.
www.ocregister.com
BerettaGuy
.308 Win
YUP! These are the same people that hated "censorship" boards in Hollywood that wouldn't show a toilet or a couple in one bed. The same people that force warnings on documentaries for "may contain smoking".
Lunacy is the correct word for sure but many normies are now lunatics and dicfors.
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
The video and photo coverage of protesters violating federal law by swarming into residential neighborhoods to intimidate select justices sure depicts identical parallels to much of the January 6th DC protests. So who expects the DOJ to show the same vigor rounding up, locking up, and throwing away the key of these abortion loving insurrectionists.
www.foxnews.com
DOJ silent on abortion protests at justices' homes despite federal law prohibiting 'pickets' to influence case
Despite the language included in the federal statute, Attorney General Merrick Garland has not issued a public statement addressing the protests outside conservative justices' homes.
www.foxnews.com
BerettaGuy
.308 Win
Well, to be fair! These kids were just starting school when Barack Obama was elected. Um UM Um
They have been indoctrinated, that bullying is bad, violence is never a solution, and that the United States is a "democracy". Democracy is "mob rule". A lynch mob is a democracy, so I guess a mob wearing pink pussy hats is democracy in action.
They have been indoctrinated, that bullying is bad, violence is never a solution, and that the United States is a "democracy". Democracy is "mob rule". A lynch mob is a democracy, so I guess a mob wearing pink pussy hats is democracy in action.
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
So at mostly peaceful protests...
pink pussy hat good,
Black hoods good,
red baseball hat or viking helmet illegal.
The decision was set to come out in June at the end of the SC session. That's still well before November elections. No need to leak if if that's your goal. Heck, waiting until it was closer would be better if that was their goal.
If the leak had a political purpose I think it would more to be influence the decision itself and not drum up votes.
Let me know when they smash the justice's home windows and make their way inside, maybe beating up some cops on the way while yelling "hang Clarence Thomas".
Otherwise... oh well, people can protest. Tough shit if they don't like it. I actually think this is better than the trucker protest in that it targets the people who they actually directly disagree with. Instead of clogging up the DC freeways for a bunch of citizens who had nothing to do with why they were upset they should have been running rings around the politicians homes who set the covid policies they disagreed with... you know... protest the people actually causing the problem and make things difficult for them, not everyone but them.
Modean
.223 Rem
Glad to know you are ok with attempting to intimidate judges.
I actually believe this is the intent. So many on the left think their views and ideals are the most important thing in the world and they love power. They love it more than anything and seek it out at every opportunity possible.
Here IMO the most likely chain of events is some SCOTUS underling caught wind of the decision and decided (since he's a leftist idealogue) to abuse his position and trust placed in him/her/ce/it/thing to try and alter the outcome, he wanted to leak the pending decision to try and gin up public outrage to intimidate the justices to then secretly change their opinion before it is publicly released. To him/her/it/they/ze the ends justify the means and it's worth subverting our system so long as it pushes their agenda which is more important than anything.
That's the type of person who would do this. And to me it makes the most sense.
Now there is a historical precedent for people who abuse their positions from within the government to affect and subvert the government and due process. The historical precedent is lengthy prison terms or being introduced to a wall. Both of which are applicable and our courts need to start making examples of people who abuse the government under the extent of the laws and due process of course.
It's not intimidation. It's protesting. If I don't like what you do as a government representative I can protest your actions in public places.
I'm also ok with the government representatives fearing the people. They've acted like royalty for far too long. They work for us, not the other way around.