NJ proposes a new hunting regulation that would require you to get written permission every hunt

[Saltwater60]

Wow, just wow. First guns now this??
It says you have to notify adjacent property owners in writing and get a written response prior to hunting. It also must include the date, time, and length of planned hunt. This is private property that you own.

New Jersey Bill Would Require Landowners to Notify Neighbors Before Hunting Their Own Land

The state's hunting community calls Assembly Bill 3732 an attack on hunting opportunities and an affront to private property rights.

www.outdoorlife.com

 

[Jmac00]

Wow, just wow. First guns now this??
It says you have to notify adjacent property owners in writing and get a written response prior to hunting. It also must include the date, time, and length of planned hunt. This is private property that you own.

New Jersey Bill Would Require Landowners to Notify Neighbors Before Hunting Their Own Land

The state's hunting community calls Assembly Bill 3732 an attack on hunting opportunities and an affront to private property rights.

www.outdoorlife.com

LOL, fuck off and die assholes. If NO ONE COMPLIES, What are they going to do???

 

[Acer-m14]

i was Target Shooting ..

 

[NY Chamorro]

Wow, just wow. First guns now this??
It says you have to notify adjacent property owners in writing and get a written response prior to hunting. It also must include the date, time, and length of planned hunt. This is private property that you own.

New Jersey Bill Would Require Landowners to Notify Neighbors Before Hunting Their Own Land

The state's hunting community calls Assembly Bill 3732 an attack on hunting opportunities and an affront to private property rights.

www.outdoorlife.com

must get written permission from prey to hunt said prey.

 

[Acer-m14]

must get written permission from prey to hunt said prey.

huh ??

 

[carpediem]

Just another blue state attempting to "out stupid" the other blue states.

 

[Michael]

Dubbed the “Restoring Safety Buffer Law,” Assembly Bill 3732 was introduced by assemblywoman Shama A. Haider on May 2. According to a statement that accompanies the legislation, it was crafted in response to an incident in which a bowhunter mistakenly shot a dog in Hunterdon County. The dog, which lived on a neighboring property, was running through the property where the bowhunter was targeting deer during archery season.

I very highly doubt that the dog was shot "by mistake." I can almost guarantee that the dog was being a nuisance and it was mother first incident of it not being where it belonged. If that's the case, ethics of shooting a dog aside, the owners should be charged with not keeping it contained and/or harassment of a hunter.

 

[Bananabandit]

In the woods or streets?

 

[Cavalry]

What if you own the parcel next to the one you are hunting...or your property adjoins public lands?

 

[Saltwater60]

I very highly doubt that the dog was shot "by mistake." I can almost guarantee that the dog was being a nuisance and it was mother first incident of it not being where it belonged. If that's the case, ethics of shooting a dog aside, the owners should be charged with not keeping it contained and/or harassment of a hunter.

I almost shot a huge Great Dane while hunting. It’s hipster owner wasn’t paying any attention and the dog was off leash, dog comes rubbing over while I’m hunting with an orange vest on, dog jumps on me and it was taller than me. My shotgun was pointed at its chest with my finger on the trigger, the dog showed no aggression, and immediately jumped back down. Any aggression and it may have ended differently. The dog was bigger than me in height and weight. When it jumped on its hind legs it was over my height. The owner never even knew this happened or that I was there.

 

[livingston]

Need to pass a law that the criminal needs to get permission from neighbors before you are robbed or assaulted... signed sealed and delivered ...

 

[livingston]

So these anti hunting groups buy a small lot and never give permission from anyone to hunt in the area surrounding them.
What about a farmer that farms say a few thousand acres .. Could have hundreds of adjoining properties. he would need to get permission from.

 

[S&W Fan]

Another draconian law proposed by a state long known to be the armpit of the nation.

 

[prambo]

Well, maybe this will wakeup a certain sub-set of firearms owner...

 

[Bigfoot]

Not that I live in NJ. But this would fall under the category of -
No thanks, that does not work for me. But fuck you anyway.

Every time the left comes up with their stupid shit. And if I played along.
It would usually require me to change how I live.
It would usually require me to change my way of life in a way that doesn't work for me.

FFS here in NY they want to tell me that I can't heat "my" house with wood.

It seems like when the Government does something the quality of my life usually goes down.
Though no fault of my own.

It seems like because I am a law-abiding, tax-paying, productive citizen, on the Conservative side of the political spectrum. I have a bigger target on my back than the violent criminals and the illegal invaders.

 

[2WheelGnnr]

it also I think It comes down to enforcement and compliance. What when you call in your tag to the DEC they then will respond with show us or permission slips....this is crazy...

I agree what about adjacent to public lands..or even more so..Hunting public lands......you arent gonna know who owns adjoining properties!! I thnk if you hunt Public Lands it would be the DEC as the owner to get the require permmission....Shoulda Known the Hunting portion of "firearms" woud get shit too eventually.....Hunting is conservation......but whatever they dont understand.....even when they bitch they hit a deer with thier car cuz them things is all over the place!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I call no one comply......like others have said...whatya gonna do.......

 

[Deplorable Me]

Maybe they could pass a similar law for drive by shooters in Newark and Bayonne.

 

[Saltwater60]

it also I think It comes down to enforcement and compliance. What when you call in your tag to the DEC they then will respond with show us or permission slips....this is crazy...

I agree what about adjacent to public lands..or even more so..Hunting public lands......you arent gonna know who owns adjoining properties!! I thnk if you hunt Public Lands it would be the DEC as the owner to get the require permmission....Shoulda Known the Hunting portion of "firearms" woud get shit too eventually.....Hunting is conservation......but whatever they dont understand.....even when they bitch they hit a deer with thier car cuz them things is all over the place!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I call no one comply......like others have said...whatya gonna do.......

If you have permission to hun there even from the state shouldn’t that be know. By those entering the property?
I hunt a small plot of land sometimes in grand island that is a 38 acres parcel that’s a WMU and I walk by people all the time with my shotgun. I think I get more nervous than they do. The one guy was with his 9 year old daughter or so and I was hiding my gun as to not spook them and he said oh look the guys hunting let’s go talk to him since you want to hunt. The little girls ran over with her da and started talking to me. I thanked them.

 

[spat]

LOL, fuck off and die assholes. If NO ONE COMPLIES, What are they going to do???

Pick people at random and make examples of them.

 

[fresch]

Ahh, the good old days, the never ending hunt. Well in season.

 

[RedBreast21]

Another method to deny you owning a firearm and using it for hunting reasons. This is about bringing notice to your neighbors. Many progressives are fleeing high tax crime ridden city areas for the remote suburbs but they bring their failed ideology with them and will likely object the activity of hunting for "safety reasons" and others. This may prevent you from hunting your own property. You may disagree and say fuck it, but that will not protect you from your progressive neighbors intent or legal action brought on you. So ignoring it isn't a sound strategy.

 

[Jmac00]

Another method to deny you owning a firearm and using it for hunting reasons. This is about bringing notice to your neighbors. Many progressives are fleeing high tax crime ridden city areas for the remote suburbs but they bring their failed ideology with them and will likely object the activity of hunting for "safety reasons" and others. This may prevent you from hunting your own property. You may disagree and say fuck it, but that will not protect you from your progressive neighbors intent or legal action brought on you. So ignoring it isn't a sound strategy.

COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC : LOVE the avatar, had some Red breast at my sons wedding Back in may. absolutely delicious whisky....except for the price, holy shit??