Planning challenge to licensing requirements

[TheRealJohnGalt]

What are your plans IF they approve your application?

Probably head to Calverton with my client to celebrate

 

[TheRealJohnGalt]

Good luck ..

i finally found 4 references .. 2 are dogs and 2 are ferrets .. none live with me or are relatives

watching this this Thread ..

If they reject because the dogs are Pitbulls or some other "restricted breed," let me know. We have a case.

 

[BerettaGuy]

Probably head to Calverton with my client to celebrate

Before or after you post a viral youtube video.

 

[TheRealJohnGalt]

Before or after you post a viral youtube video.

You mean TikTok right?

 

[Bustedknees]

Probably head to Calverton with my client to celebrate

But there would still be a mountain more of infringements to play with.

 

[camper4lyfe]

Being through this mess since 2013 (yeah, short compared to many), it's caused my to be quite skeptical. I will wish you the best, and prepare for the worst.

 

[Jchrisls]

Following

 

[BerettaGuy]

After you are denied, what would happen if we were able to get 100's of applicants to do the same thing in other counties. Class Action maybe?

 

[TheRealJohnGalt]

After you are denied, what would happen if we were able to get 100's of applicants to do the same thing in other counties. Class Action maybe?

I'm not sure. If claims similar to the one I would bring are made, an appellate court might consolidate the cases and issue a general ruling.

We are not bringing a suit for damages if we are denied. It will be for declaratory relief. So, imagine in a standard lawsuit for damages, you are seeking a verdict or ruling that you were "injured," and your "relief" is usually a monetary amount.

In a case like this, what we would be doing is seeking "declaratory relief" from a court. Specifically, we would be seeking a determination or ruling by a Court declaring (hence the term "declaratory relief") that we DID comply with the Constitution (and SCOTUS interpretation), and that our refusal to provide references, social media accounts, etc. is not a basis for denial. Our "relief" would be this aforementioned declaration, accompanied with a Court Order that the County re-process the application Constitutionally (correctly).

That's the best layman explanation I can give. A suit for damages could be brought simultaneously, or subsequently, or additionally if the County refused to comply (thereby expressly violating my rights and a court order), etc. Make sense?

 

[Gonzobird]

I am no legal genius here so forgive me if i am asking a dumb question but can you file an injunction with whatever court against the law that was passed to have it reviewed for it's consitutaionalty?

 

[spat]

I'm not sure. If claims similar to the one I would bring are made, an appellate court might consolidate the cases and issue a general ruling.

We are not bringing a suit for damages if we are denied. It will be for declaratory relief. So, imagine in a standard lawsuit for damages, you are seeking a verdict or ruling that you were "injured," and your "relief" is usually a monetary amount.

In a case like this, what we would be doing is seeking "declaratory relief" from a court. Specifically, we would be seeking a determination or ruling by a Court declaring (hence the term "declaratory relief") that we DID comply with the Constitution (and SCOTUS interpretation), and that our refusal to provide references, social media accounts, etc. is not a basis for denial. Our "relief" would be this aforementioned declaration, accompanied with a Court Order that the County re-process the application Constitutionally (correctly).

That's the best layman explanation I can give. A suit for damages could be brought simultaneously, or subsequently, or additionally if the County refused to comply (thereby expressly violating my rights and a court order), etc. Make sense?

We need to start suing for damages.

Declaratory relief only means they can keep throwing up new roadblocks endlessly. Why would they stop ?

Imagine if the only penalty for shoplifting was that you had to put the merchandise back.

 

[tirwin1]

Thank you for the response.

Top ten potential main reasons for posting here:


6. You hope this will lead to an interview on Fox with Shannon Bream.

You hope it will lead to a torrid affair with Shannon Bream.

FIFY

 

[spat]

Thank you - I was just trying to stay family friendly

Wholly unnecessary on this site

 

[Drinkthekoolaid]

Lone wolf of course. Cmon man. Appreciate the NRA generally but I’m looking to make my arguments my way with my client, free from any other influence or party or media spectacle. Just your humble attorney representing his client’s interests...

Hopefully you have enough Dagnys, Fransiscos, and Hanks.


Keep the Wesley Mouchs far away from your cause.

Keep fighting the good fight, thank you.