Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
" In this video I discuss how the State of California now claims their purchase restrictions do not implicate the Second Amendment and therefore the Supreme Court's decision has no impact!"
California Defies Supreme Court Carry Decision & Claims It Has No Impact!!!
- Thread starter Acer-m14
- Start date
1075tech
.338 Win Mag
Well, there is, but no one wants to go there......yet.
If the States can ignore the constitution and SCOTUS, then we need to stop being "law abiding" citizens and ignore the states
spat
.950 JDJ
The courts *could* hold a state official in contempt if they are too blatant in their belligerence.
If that's the case, they could have the offender incarcerated.
repete
.338 Win Mag
Who was the asshole from Ca. that said something about nukes and right wing states?
Courts are useless, laws are useless, politicians are useless..
DrBleachCocktail
.44 mag
So states can reject law but if we do the same we’re the baddies?
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
Felons to be exact.
Far king
.357 mag
Not unless you’re convicted.
Far king
.357 mag
Not only did Nys ignore scotus they blatantly defied scotus! FUKH
spat
.950 JDJ
SCOTUS needs to start holding specific officials in contempt, and issuing warrants for their arrest.
They can't do anything to new York State, but they can have the people running the place locked up.
They won't.
spat
.950 JDJ
Unfortunately you're probably right.
President Andrew Jackson reportedly responded: "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!"[6][7]
Worcester v. Georgia - Wikipedia
It does raise the question though, how far can that doctrine be pushed before the people withdraw their consent.
This is the way.
By who? The NY state police?
Then, What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
If this corrupt leftist NY gov’t. Choose to blatantly ignore the Supreme law of the land then it’s high time it’s citizens chose to ignore their unconstitutional laws.
If this corrupt leftist NY gov’t. Choose to blatantly ignore the Supreme law of the land then it’s high time it’s citizens chose to ignore their unconstitutional laws.
I’m sure there are plenty rank and file officers that would love the opportunity to do just that.
JRtraderny
.308 Win
Isn't this what the US Marshall's service is for ??
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Shit, if you make a sarcastic comment about the governor you're on a list.
Bigfoot
.577 Tyrannosaur.
uh oh
I refer to her as Hochul the Horrible.
Think that would do it? If someone isn't on a list by now their doing it wrong.
Egret-II
.40 S&W
We only become felons because cops enforce those unconstitutional laws. Governors and mayors in these states dont obey the supreme court because the SC doesnt have cops to enforce their ruling. But governors and mayors do have gestapos to throw us in jail if we dont follow their commands.
spat
.950 JDJ
It would be a federal contempt charge.
So, probably the FBI or US marshals would enforce it.
If not them, then the police that answer directly to SCOTUS.
Any state police that attempt to interfere could be arrested themselves for obstruction.
Far king
.357 mag
The Utica city PD and Oneida Co Sheriffs dept are said to have made a decision to enforce the law in accordance with the constitution of theUSA . The state police are a different story.
I could see that getting messy quick.
Your answer is probably right though in terms of my question.
spat
.950 JDJ
Oh, could get very very messy. That's how civil wars start.
I just refer to the hag as the CIA: the Cunt In Albany.
Deplorable Me
.700 Nitro Express
Correction. We need to start being law abiding citizens and ignore the rogue state ignoring the Constitution. Conflicting laws.
Deplorable Me
.700 Nitro Express
Sarcastic? I can assure you I'm dead serious when I say I hope her vibrator shorts out and the GFI is defective next time she's in the bathtub.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
what i posted in another thread .. but need to change it a little bit to pertain to Cali ..
say a case is a win and it was ruled unconstitutional .. ... then nothing is followed up . . they just make more bad laws and knowingly do it ..
so the plaintiffs and lawyers now need to personally sue the all involved for damages .. lawers fees .ect
they lost there Qualified Immunity per say ... they lost ..
hit them in there own bank account ..
put them on the hot seat .. with a personal law suit for once .. will the tax payers cover their expense ?
deprivation of rights and Conspiracy against rights ... maybe could be used ..
say a case is a win and it was ruled unconstitutional .. ... then nothing is followed up . . they just make more bad laws and knowingly do it ..
so the plaintiffs and lawyers now need to personally sue the all involved for damages .. lawers fees .ect
they lost there Qualified Immunity per say ... they lost ..
hit them in there own bank account ..
put them on the hot seat .. with a personal law suit for once .. will the tax payers cover their expense ?
deprivation of rights and Conspiracy against rights ... maybe could be used ..
It's depressing that this is what america has become. The majority of its citizens are weak and are so eager to live on their knees. I think it is safe to say that this country is effectively dead.