They will "hear" the cases. Its going to be a long while before we hear their decision i`m afraid.Might still be Monday according to this article.
Monday a big court day for 2nd amendment, gun laws, gun rights
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Manhattan, will hear five second amendment cases Monday.www.wktv.com
Come on the article said they could rule from the bench??
"It's not clear if the judges will rule from the bench, or, reserve decision and issue a written one at a later date. But Sullivan is hopeful for the outcome."
Come on, you KNOW that`s NOT part of the plan/agenda. Stall tactics, stall tactics i tell ya! Kick that can down the road!!!
I agree with @JunkBoxFull. This will drag out for a LOOOONNNNGGG time. Besides, for the judges, the cocktail and dinner circuit is just around the corner ( spring). Why would you ruin the potential if getting invitations to hob nob with the powerful over pesky things like rights?
This was a joke guys.
I think they will toss us a bone on private property. NYS a will then give private property sign the power of law and then they will start enforcing it so again we will be worse off. I think we will get guns in churches and maybe bars, but most of the others will stay banned. They have been warned they have to do something. If they do nothing then it will surely go to the SC.
The real hypothetical question would be if that would be considered in line with Bruen and if that compromise would be viewed sufficient by SCOTUS. Being that the SC would most likely not intervene with the lower courts ruling without a hearing to GVR it would "kick the can" again for at least a year, if not more as an emergency stay was already passed up by the SC awhile back, offering guidance to speed up the process rather than intervene. Time will tell, but my money is on 18 months more at minimum.
The CCIA goes beyond the safe act and a tack on charge. They completely screwed over anyone wanting a CCW
Yes. The social media stuff, and the training made it more difficult to get. But its the sensitive areas that are the biggest issue. And what I am saying is that being charged for carrying in a sensitive location will be a tack on charge if you are committing another crime or in some sort of dispute.
Haven't heard a thing. If that means the guy wasn't charged, kudos to the area PD and the dude.
I bet we`ll never hear anymore about it. It doesn`t fit their tyrannical narrative, because he was "protecting" human life.
That doesn't happen and she doesn't need the data to know she is right
Talk to any detective and there are plenty of people that have been charged and prosecuted under the safe act. We hear about arrests all the time on the news and in articles posted here.
Do you have any articles or direct citations your aware of you would be willing to post?
I know my dad and brother have both made safe act arrests. I know some were tossed out.
www.politifact.com
www.nj.com
Take that site with a grain of salt.I know my dad and brother have both made safe act arrests. I know some were tossed out.
I mean honestly anything over ten rounds or any assault weapons arrest is a safe act arrest. Also any private sale person to person arrest is a safe act arrest.
Here is a general breakdown of safe act arrests per county.
Which counties have had the most SAFE Act arrests?
Republican lawmakers in Albany are pushing a new proposal to repeal New York state’s 2013 gun control law, the New York
I know my dad and brother have both made safe act arrests. I know some were tossed out.
I mean honestly anything over ten rounds or any assault weapons arrest is a safe act arrest. Also any private sale person to person arrest is a safe act arrest.
Here is a general breakdown of safe act arrests per county.
Which counties have had the most SAFE Act arrests?
Republican lawmakers in Albany are pushing a new proposal to repeal New York state’s 2013 gun control law, the New York
.. even my mom called that out .. lol Unfortunately but as predicted he stated he believes this won't be decided until the summer. Unfortunately his research has found it unlikely that the ruling will go in our favor due to the appointed panel. If correct, this will be a SCOTUS case, and no new cases will be granted writs ( I believe even GVRs) until the following session in around October of 2023, if we are lucky. Even if they did decide to take it, controversial cases are almost always decided last, meaning the following year ( and that would be incredibly fast for the SC) nearly next summer, or my prediction of 18 months, in 2024.
Funny how you made that speech sounds so positive. I read it and thought yep he’s right and the liberals can undo the constitution and the second amendment. Sorry and not trying to burst your Bible as I do think we will get a mediocre positive ruling because if not it’s surely to go to the Supreme Court. If they toss us a bone the plaintiffs might be satisfied and not pursue it any further.
