I wouldn't even call that misuse. Why not just focus on the underlying crime? Should a racing suit and helmet become illegal because someone wore them while blowing through a stop sign to evade the police? What about rape? Should the punishment be increased (or even decreased) if the rapist wore a condom?How about enhanced charges for illegal use of armor while committing a preconceived plan for max death? Instant death penalty. Stop restricting the lawful due to misuse.
NY has long presumed and treated it's Citizens as not yet convicted felons and made assumptions that if you had a gun, you were going to use it illegally, and if you're wearing Body Armor you're hedging your bets on getting shot while committing a felonious crimes.I wouldn't even call that misuse. Why not just focus on the underlying crime? Should a racing suit and helmet become illegal because someone wore them while blowing through a stop sign to evade the police? What about rape? Should the punishment be increased (or even decreased) if the rapist wore a condom?
IIRC early legislation allowed First Responders Body Armor to some degree...we have Vests in the Ambulance Bays and a few inside the Rigs, so I never got too worked up about the prohibition and wouldn't have even if FR's weren't included, I'm going to wear one when and if the situation dictates, and I just dare Deputy Dog to try and make a case over it, please do, we'll have a media campaign to expose this bullshit for exactly what it is.If this legislation passes. What about the people who already own/possess body armor?
Will that body armor be grandfathered in, or will the people who have owned body armor for years in some cases, have to get rid of their property, possession, protection, and squander the money that was spent?
To stay within the law, will they be required to sell, destroy, or turn in the body armor?
Being that NY is NY. This legislation will most likely pass and be signed into law. IMO
<sigh> It's all so fucking tiring. IIRC, not very long ago, after NY banned something, I posted in a thread. "What's NY going to ban next?" and here we are.
How would they know that you own any? unless one wore it all the time and happened to be stopped by the popo.If this legislation passes. What about the people who already own/possess body armor?
Will that body armor be grandfathered in, or will the people who have owned body armor for years in some cases, have to get rid of their property, possession, protection, and squander the money that was spent?
To stay within the law, will they be required to sell, destroy, or turn in the body armor?
Being that NY is NY. This legislation will most likely pass and be signed into law. IMO
<sigh> It's all so fucking tiring. IIRC, not very long ago, after NY banned something, I posted in a thread. "What's NY going to ban next?" and here we are.
How would they know that you own any? unless one wore it all the time and happened to be stopped by the popo.
I've seen some decent diy videos for making both hard and flexible body armor at home using readily available (common in many home garages and shops like welding fiberglass blankets and resin) for both level IIIA, IV. Some seem serviceable and test out fine.
FIFYIf the douchebags in Albany really gave a shit about New Yorkers, they would turnover illegal alien criminals, stop the cashless bail horseshit, ditch the liberal Soros DAs, lock up the addicts / criminal "homeless" off the street, brutally prosecute pediphiles, etc
But no, body armor it is. Democrats are the enemy of We the People... IMHO

Given the alternative to being charged in that situation, how stupid would someone have to be to follow it ?Let's say a home invasion happens and armor is at the ready and quickly goes on. The shit happens and it goes down. Then the LE investigation takes place. Yeah, I know: take it off and hide it if need be and don't bring that fact up. But just for discussion's sake.
Would a person be charged with a crime in a self-defence scenario while wearing body armor?
I think that wearing body armor would strengthen the argument of "in fear of life or great bodily injury" in a sort of way.
But IDK, I'm just thinkingout loudand typing.
I should move somewhere where the state government isn't on the same side as the homegrown criminals and illegal criminal invaders. I should make that happen. I'm just saying.