Could say the same for the trial of Sarah Osborne.No one is surprised by this. It was a foregone conclusion the same day charges were announced.
Thats what I want to know. If you buy your child a car and they run someone down, shouldn't you be liable by this logic?Could say the same for the trial of Sarah Osborne.
The real question is, will this precedent be applied universally, or will some demographic groups be immune ?
If I remember correctly, back when he was first tried, they are claiming he KNEW his son was unhinged and bought him the rifle anyway.Thats what I want to know. If you buy your child a car and they run someone down, shouldn't you be liable by this logic?
Thats what I want to know. If you buy your child a car and they run someone down, shouldn't you be liable by this logic?
Thats rather odd. Was this a UCMJ action or off post? You were arrested or convicted? A person is not liable for another actions with a loaned vehicle as long as they were not privy to their crime, but can see the person being questioned or even arrested during the investigation.If the car is yours, and you lend it to someone, you are responsible for their actions.
1977 I was active duty USCG up on Wellsley Island. I had an impacted wisdom tooth. USCG does not have medical/dental staff (emts, medics yes) and normally must go to US Public Health Service. I was sent to (then) Camp Drum for dental care. Since I was to be sedated I was required to have a driver. Seaman Smith asked me if he could use the truck to go to the PX. I said yes.
Seaman Smith not only went to the PX , he drove around and took a sewing machine out of what he thought was a burned down abandoned property.
A month later we were both arrested for burglary. I was an accomplice because I let him use the truck, it doesn't matter if you qualify their usage to "go to the PX". Once you give them the keys they can do whatever they want and you will be held accountable for whatever wrong they do.
Was exactly my first thought as well.Thats what I want to know. If you buy your child a car and they run someone down, shouldn't you be liable by this logic?
Thats rather odd. Was this a UCMJ action or off post? You were arrested or convicted? A person is not liable for another actions with a loaned vehicle as long as they were not privy to their crime, but can see the person being questioned or even arrested during the investigation.
WTF? Thats some next level kangaroo.NYS Police, Arrested and pled guilty to a lesser charge
Judge kicked my lawyer, the State Trooper, and the local prosecutor out of the courtroom and told me I was guilty. He gave me a one-time offer to plead guilty to Trespassing and pay a $50 fine or he would bring everybody back into the courtroom , pronounce me guilty of Burglary and sentence me to 2 years in prison. Told me it didn't matter if I only gave him permission to go to the PX.
I paid the $50, He recorded it as a $25 fine, and that I did not pay it.
Group Commander denied my promotion.
20 years later a warrant was sworn out for my arrest for the original charge because I did not pay the fine.
I have a Relief from Disabilities
Wow, that's bad. I've experienced some similar shenanigans in the past, but not that bad, thankfully. Story time:NYS Police, Arrested and pled guilty to a lesser charge
Judge kicked my lawyer, the State Trooper, and the local prosecutor out of the courtroom and told me I was guilty. He gave me a one-time offer to plead guilty to Trespassing and pay a $50 fine or he would bring everybody back into the courtroom , pronounce me guilty of Burglary and sentence me to 2 years in prison. Told me it didn't matter if I only gave him permission to go to the PX.
I paid the $50, He recorded it as a $25 fine, and that I did not pay it.
Group Commander denied my promotion.
20 years later a warrant was sworn out for my arrest for the original charge because I did not pay the fine.
I have a Relief from Disabilities