Awesome to do the class, but I hope they use an NRA certified instructor as we all know that cops are often not the best representative of responsible fire arm safety training and sometimes the worst. Maybe the right side photo is AI/SI generated, but not representative of where I would point my firearm. Just saying. More often than not, "photo's" attached to news articles get it wrong as they don't accurately represent what the article is about. Especially when it comes to firearms. I have seen that locally many times and when I communicate that to the articles author, they always play if off as unimportant. If it's important enough to include with the article, it's important enough to get it right. A picture is worth a thousand words.
I don't like the R word as a matter of principle, but when I see these folks my brain automatically says "whee tah did". Smart enough to all engage in Gov Walz state supported fraud with their NGO's all listed at the same address. Genius move that is obviously passed down to the next generation at the Learing Center.
I am waiting, I am waiting, I am waiting.................
This picture is AI. It says it on the bottom right.Worse than that. He doesn't just have his finger on the trigger, he's basically stuck it in as far as it will go LoL.
Dude would have his whole arm in there if it would fit.
View attachment 289507
Why is it a Youtuber is a better investigator than the whole trained FBI and DOJ combined?
I realize the image is AI, but holy hell. A little "proofreading" from whomever created it would have been nice before they published it. Lol
Someone needs to teach the AI how to handle a gun.This picture is AI. It says it on the bottom right.
Ummm.....no.Someone needs to teach the AI how to handle a gun.
See the acronym "LIFER" for the answer to your question.Why is it a Youtuber is a better investigator than the whole trained FBI and DOJ combined?
It's not going to be a fight between humans and AI.
7 year old meme that's still way off.

They don't need 50%.7 year old meme that's still way off.
According to the Pew Research Center, the U.S. Muslim population will reach only about 2.1% of the total population (roughly 8.1 million people) by 2050.
While growing rapidly, this share is not large enough to independently elect a president through a single-faith voting bloc.
With the worst case manipulation of the electoral college it takes 24% of the voters to secure a President (usually much closer to 50%) so they are still less than 10% of the way there by 2050 (closer to 5% of the way there).
My guess the crazies won't be patient enough to wait even with all the leverage they're getting from the DNC, they'll try to force their will and they'll end up back below 1% when the dust settles leaving just mostly those who have aquired a taste for bacon.
View attachment 289555
OK. In 2050 they'll be just over 2%. That ain't electing an admitted Radical Muslim, but may help get another Obama closet Muslim though....They don't need 50%.
40% of the people are brain dead sheep that'll vote for anyone or anything with a "D" next to it on the ballot.
Nah, give them a few super delegates and they could get a Mamdani the "D" nomination.OK. In 2050 they'll be just over 2%. That ain't electing an admitted Radical Muslim, but may help get another Obama closet Muslim though....
