Well , he gave them 14 days to do itNice, but hochul and team will announce the appeal and corresponding work-around before the ink dries on this judge's decision.
The appeal has to be one that directly addresses his reasons for the decision. Meaning, they have to argue the point that banning advancing technology in body armor, firearms....ect is in line with 2A and consistent with the constitution. My guess is Hochul and James will produce more ads for their elections blaming Trump and republicans using this decision in the ads.What I will never understand is why Judges delay their ruling like this for 14 days so the State’s lawyer can review and file an apppeal? He ruled it unconstitutional, what the fuck is there to appeal????!!

You gotta hand it to them, the grabbers are pretty creative at doing exactly that.How long until Hochul the Horrible gives the judge the middle finger and doubles down?
My reasoning is this: There is no reason even in the realm of justification that this should have ever been a thing.I say lets hope this ruling sticks. ... My reasoning is this . If one was at the range to practice . Being able to wear one would be most comforting .All of us have been around someone that really should not be shooting a gun .
The 14 day stay issued by the judge is customary. The State, as elected representatives of the citizens, having duly passed and enacted a law, would suffer harm (in the eyes of the law) by having the injunction take effect without a chance to appeal the ruling.What I will never understand is why Judges delay their ruling like this for 14 days so the State’s lawyer can review and file an apppeal? He ruled it unconstitutional, what the fuck is there to appeal????!!