Deerfield bans assault weapons and high-capacity magazines

[Robin]

One Federal judge does not make law.

From a practical standpoint, yeah, they do. Skretny! Effing asshat! We suffer under the yoke of all kinds of unconstitutional laws, not just NYSSR but NATIONALLY, that progressive judges have upheld on appeal and people cannot afford to take it to the next judicial level, they, the statists, know this and count on it.
Robin

 

[SteyrAug]

Suit may be filed and go all the way to SOCTUS. Again----- Heller WAS NOT arrested. All it takes is $$$$$.

 

[M_F]

Based on ex post factor yes the mag would be legal the state offered no way to register it. But good luck finding a judge in NY or the second circuit who would set the precedent. It would nullify the ban because in most cases there is no way for them to prove you got a mag unlawfully. This happened with the 94 ban. What we have is a clear violation of ex post facto and Activist judges will send people to jail based on the local unconstitutional law and their beliefs.

The laws are being brought to court using the same tired arguments that keep getting shot down ... There are allot of other angles no one seems to be using in court. U.S. vs Miller specifically mentions arms suitable for militia use ... and no one will argue that an AR15 is suitable if we cant have machine guns or sawed off shotguns would make sense an AR15 is quintessential firearm .. as most gun owners agree the modern day do it all musket and there for protected. Not a single recent case brings this up. WHY NOT?

because they don't want to upset the machine gun ban.

see below, If a sawed off shotgun is not protected because it has no Militia Use then guns with a militia use are protected ... NOBODY is bringing this up. Because if they did the ban on machine guns would go south also. Its to the point judges just make shit up out of thin air .. Like unusual weapons or common use ... Its all BS.


US vs Miller The Supreme Court reversed the district court, holding that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual the right to keep and bear a sawed-off doublebarrel shotgun. With Justice James Clark McReynolds writing for the majority, the Court reasoned that because the possession of a sawed-off double barrel shotgun does not have a reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, the Second Amendment does not protect the possession of such an instrument.

the recent post of the law student fighting NYC is a fresh twist. The Law student is using the law its self against itself which is brilliant. He stifled one of the judges with flat out common sense the judge cut himself off before he said something that would have helped the plaintiffs argument.

WHY ARE US GUN OWNERS PISSED? because you don't need law school or to pass the BAR to see that the judiciary is corrupt and doesn't even follow its own rulings. Its turned into some convoluted philosophy debate. LAWS ARE TO BE WRITTEN TO BE SPECIFIC AND SO THE AVERAGE PERSON CAN DISCERN THERE MEANING!

When the NYC 1991 AWB got challenged the 2nd Circus ruled that the plaintiffs were not forbidden from owning the newly banned semi automatic firearms, they were only forbidden from keeping it within city limits. If a federal ban becomes law will the corrupt courts tell us to keep our property outside the USA?
The case was Richmond Boro gun club v. City of NY

 

[Shadow2]

Cases where a person is prosecuted and found guilty have the best chances of going before the SCOTUS. Because it is "ripe" its not a hypothetical question, someone has actually suffered either incarceration or finical burden from something potentially unconstitutional. Cases often get rejected because the plaintiff suffered no lose. I mention this because Scalia when alive mentioned it. The conservative judges may be looking for the right case, and no ones hit the nail on the head because they keep using the same tired ass angles.

Suit may be filed and go all the way to SOCTUS. Again----- Heller WAS NOT arrested. All it takes is $$$$$.

 

[SteyrAug]

Heller was not arrested. Scalia wrote the majority opinion. Who wants to be arrested and bankrupted when it's not necessary ?

Don't see anyone here choosing to wreck their lives by choosing to break the law on the slim chance you might become a 2nd A. poster child.

 

[sschrad]

Just like I said in post #1, town by town , village by village.

Northbrook considers legal options in assault weapons ban enforcement