Yes, unlike so many here. Again, what I have to say is irrelevant. I cannot rule.
Beto is not coming for your guns.
- Thread starter Marine Cpl
- Start date
Yes, unlike so many here. Again, what I have to say is irrelevant. I cannot rule.
Well no it is relevant. Is taking property without due process constitutional.. I'll give you a hint the answer is in the constitution
What you say, they,or know makes little to no difference. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
I bet the Yankee marshal was the best cop ever. Air and go are jealous.
If he was a cop, do you think he was ever a violator of rights.
Jealous of this guy, um no. My gun collection is way better than his.
Copied my post, #86...
Holy shit, I get that. Why the fuck are so many here so fucking thick?
Let me come up with a different situation...
Someone that does not like you calls the Police or the courts and files paperwork needed to get a Red Flag order against you. Judge signs that order and turns the warrant over to the Police; Police arrive to take your guns. You respond with "Sorry, cannot have them, it is a violation of my Rights" You think the Police are going to leave empty handed?
I know all of our Rights, know them and being to exercise them is two different things.
So the constitution isnt relevant..
I am guessing you do think the safe act is constitutional but dont have the chest to post it on here
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
It was a joke of course but I call bull shit on the collection. White ar..... yeah sorry
I don’t think he was a cop. Maybe a reserve officer who worked a parade.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
They are supposed to refuse to even go over there since doing so is a violation of their oath.
Have you been touched by the stupid sickness? Seriously. I have always posted exactly how I feel, I do not hold back, ever.
I hate everything about the SAFE Act. I think each and every part of it is in DIRECT violation of my Rights. Nearly everything in Penal Law 265 and 400 are violations of our Rights. I hate all of it.
But, knowing that and thinking that does nothing. NOTHING!
Again, you know your rights, do something in direct violation of the SAFE Act in public and see how knowing works for you!
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
He was. He actually said that back then he thought only certain people should have guns.
Sure, yes, I get that. I have posted many times that I agree to that.
A copper that does follow orders and goes to the home, do you think he gives a rats ass about what you know are your Rights?
I post these ideas only to point out Knowing your Rights only go so far.
There will always be people that do not care what you know or what you do not know.
Cops, Judges, Politicians... the list goes on about those that do not care what you may think you know.
Ah yes because police will arrest you for it makes it constitutional... ok cool got it @GOPerfect
You have a serious reading comprehension issue. I believe in my last post I stated a few times that it is direct violation of my Rights. Maybe you should re-read what I typed.
Again, you cannot seem to understand the clearly typed words, try reading just a bit slower, if there are too many big words, Google can help you.
Just knowing your Rights, telling those in power what you know are your Rights, will not stop them from doing what they do.
Because honestly it's a yes or no question that you are avoiding a direct answer to which means either you have a reading comprehension issue to your answer is yes the safe act is constitutional but dont want to openly admit it
You are really freaken tarded...
No, I do not. But again, what I think, what you think and what others think is not the issue. We do not have the power nor do we have the position to make change within the court system.
How do you know that the safe act is unconstitutional
Being unconstitutional and the words, "Direct Violation of the Constitution" are the exact same thing.
Jesus @GOPerfect I think you already know you fucked yourself in this argument so instead of answering any questions and coming up the fool you just keep fucking digging in and trying to divert the conversation
But SCOTUS never ruled the safe act unconstitutional or in your side stepping dont want to actually answer a question "direct violation" so you cant know that the safe act is any of that
How did I fuck myself. Which post? Can;t wait to see what you think further. Waiting with baited breath.