Senate Votes to Allow FBI to Look at Your Web Browsing History Without a Warrant

BDinPutnam

BDinPutnam

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,490
Reaction score
20,853
Location
Someplace else
Ah, the good old Patriot Act.

Wherein, buried somewhere around page 1200 we were forbidden to buy more than 30 doses of Claritan a month (and required to show ID, and be entered into a database at each purchase).

Because clearly we were all making microbatches of artisanal meth to support terrorists.
 
1075tech

1075tech

.338 Win Mag
Messages
7,275
Reaction score
17,747
Location
Escaped NY
They were 1 vote short of blocking it but some of those that would have, couldn't make it. Priorities and all
 
BDinPutnam

BDinPutnam

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,490
Reaction score
20,853
Location
Someplace else
E the massive said:
Nope. ISP has it all. Bet they can just do a mega data dump of all users so the feds can use keyword search software.
Click to expand...

I think @prambo was talking about passing this as a law by running it through the House and then up to the White House. I dont want to speak for him.

On point in my wheelhouse- "keyword" is passe. Pattern analysis is where it's at. I dont care what you say. I care about who you talk to and how often.

And you're a lot late on the data dump. It exists in MD and Utah it's just a question of who gets access and what they do with it.
 
prambo

prambo

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
18,466
Reaction score
43,601
Location
The 'Hood in the Northern Wood
BDinPutnam said:
I think @prambo was talking about passing this as a law by running it through the House and then up to the White House. I dont want to speak for him.

On point in my wheelhouse- "keyword" is passe. Pattern analysis is where it's at. I dont care what you say. I care about who you talk to and how often.

And you're a lot late on the data dump. It exists in MD and Utah it's just a question of who gets access and what they do with it.
Click to expand...

Forgot about the ISP rat finks. Was talking abour physical access to our house.

The FBI isn't LE anymore, they're professional 5th columnists and, thus, I would consider it to be a home invasion.
 
E the massive

E the massive

.308 Win
Messages
4,419
Reaction score
6,511
Location
Yer mom
BDinPutnam said:
I think @prambo was talking about passing this as a law by running it through the House and then up to the White House. I dont want to speak for him.

On point in my wheelhouse- "keyword" is passe. Pattern analysis is where it's at. I dont care what you say. I care about who you talk to and how often.

And you're a lot late on the data dump. It exists in MD and Utah it's just a question of who gets access and what they do with it.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't this make the info admissible in court and to further an investigation without that pesky "fruit of the poisonous tree"?
 
Xae289

Xae289

.223 Rem
Messages
1,256
Reaction score
2,141
Location
Westchester County
Use VPNs and Tor for any browsing you want to keep your creepy uncle Sam in the dark on. Do your research. If the oppressed people of China can get around their infinitely more oppresive government's censorship, you can successfully hide what you do from our far less oppressive state that at least has to pretend like the Bill of Rights exists... some of it... Sometimes...

As usual with gov oppression, don't comply, and if there's nothing you can do, at least don't make it easy for them.
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
31,919
Reaction score
67,661
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
Blimey

Blimey

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
11,290
Reaction score
16,264
Location
Western NY
I ALWAYS hated this act.

Quick google tells me this is true.

So in light of that McConnell can absolutely go fuck himself. He is a traitor in fact as are all those others who support this.

@Xae289 is right. VPN not bad but if you really want tracks hidden use Tor. I assume there are measures beyond that but I never looked into them.
 
1075tech

1075tech

.338 Win Mag
Messages
7,275
Reaction score
17,747
Location
Escaped NY
E the massive said:
According to the link it's "targeted" users. I assume this formerly required a warrant.
Click to expand...
Maybe so, but as we've seen with FISA, getting a warrant isn't all that hard and doesn't even have to be obtained on fact. At this point, it's all for show. Soon, no warrant will be needed. They will blatantly spy and surveil at will.

The Constitution is merely a historical document of a former society.
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
31,919
Reaction score
67,661
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
E the massive said:
According to the link it's "targeted" users. I assume this formerly required a warrant.
Click to expand...
Yes, it technically required a warrant.

But apparently walking down the hall to get the rubber stamp for the warrant is too much trouble, so they had to streamline it.

I mean if you're an FBI agent, this makes perfect sense. The warrant requirement was just some annoying paperwork anyway. They are just eliminating some bureaucracy.

It's been proven that it wasn't actually a check on power at all anyway.
 
Shadow2

Shadow2

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,391
Reaction score
2,067
Location
Westchester
They need to find out how many cops are searching for information on the constitution and how it relates to their oaths so they can be put on the domestic threat list.
 
BDinPutnam

BDinPutnam

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,490
Reaction score
20,853
Location
Someplace else
spat said:
Well, there is a limit to how much traffic they can sort.

That's the only practical limit on how much surveillance they can do. I assume if they max out the links from an ISP they just tell the ISP they need to up their game.
Click to expand...

I dont know what you mean by "links"?

The physical limitations are storage space and speed. NSA's new facility out west rolled out with several calls to the fire department because the HVAC wasn't up to the task of cooling the machines.
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
31,919
Reaction score
67,661
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
BDinPutnam said:
I dont know what you mean by "links"?

The physical limitations are storage space and speed. NSA's new facility out west rolled out with several calls to the fire department because the HVAC wasn't up to the task of cooling the machines.
Click to expand...
The circuits to hall the traffic from the ISP to the intercept boxes.

It's not about the storage. They will locate the intercept boxes close to the ISP, those boxes will sort all the traffic and only direct the "interesting" stuff to the storage facilities.

I bet for every 10G of traffic they intercept they only store a few Mb of it.
 
libertysnake

libertysnake

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,860
Reaction score
16,438
Location
New York
Just use a VPN. It's not that they can't decrypt your traffic. They probably can. It's that the computational amount of effort it takes to unlock the browsing history of one individual is not worth it unless they have a really big reason to do so over far more important tasks.
 
BDinPutnam

BDinPutnam

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,490
Reaction score
20,853
Location
Someplace else
spat said:
The circuits to hall the traffic from the ISP to the intercept boxes.

It's not about the storage. They will locate the intercept boxes close to the ISP, those boxes will sort all the traffic and only direct the "interesting" stuff to the storage facilities.

I bet for every 10G of traffic they intercept they only store a few Mb of it.
Click to expand...

Interesting.

You think the data collected is targeted and a subset?

Not how it works. Even if you buy the "mass collection of metadata without content" canard.

Coming from someone who's (I think) well known as an anti-conspiracy theorist around here.

Targeted surveillance yeah I will give you that but that's not what Patriot is about and that's not at issue here. Domestic leo has been able to do targeted intercept for a long time.
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
31,919
Reaction score
67,661
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
BDinPutnam said:
Interesting.

You think the data collected is targeted and a subset?

Not how it works. Even if you buy the "mass collection of metadata without content" canard.

Coming from someone who's (I think) well known as an anti-conspiracy theorist around here.

Targeted surveillance yeah I will give you that but that's not what Patriot is about and that's not at issue here. Domestic leo has been able to do targeted intercept for a long time.
Click to expand...
I am pretty familiar with the start of how it works.

They "get a warrant" and initiate either a metadata or full tap on the target of the warrant.

Either the packet headers or the full contents of all traffic to and from the target's IP address are duplicated and sent to the intercept box.

The intercept box will sort that traffic and decide what's "interesting" based on whatever criteria the they feel like configuring.

The circuit from the ISP to the intercept box is a possible bottleneck
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top