Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
Election Coverage And Results Thread
- Thread starter Dr. Evil
- Start date
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Explanation of how easily electronic voting systems can be manipulated. From The New York Times, of all places (back in 2018 when they were investigating how Trump won).
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Ummm....."discovery" is part of the legal pretrial process.
Typically done among the parties directly involved in the precedings and not publicly on national TV, no?
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
March 28, 2006 Why is Hugo Chávez Involved With U.S. Voting Machines?
By Richard Brand
The greater threat to our nation's security comes not from Dubai and its pro-Western government, but from Venezuela, where software engineers with links to the leftist, anti-American regime of Hugo Chávez are programming electronic voting machines that will soon power U.S. elections.
Congress spent two weeks overreacting to news that Dubai Ports World would operate several American ports, including Miami's, but a better target for their hysteria would be the acquisition by Smartmatic International of California-based Sequoia Voting Systems, whose machines serve millions of U.S. voters. That Smartmatic -- which has been accused by Venezuela's opposition of helping Chávez rig elections in his favor -- now controls a major U.S. e-voting firm should give pause to anybody who thinks that replacing our antiquated butterfly ballots and hanging chads will restore Americans' faith in our electoral process.
Consider the lack of confidence Venezuelans have in their voting system. Anti-Chávez groups have such little faith in Smartmatic's machines that they refuse to run candidates in elections anymore as reports surface of fraud and irregularities from Chávez's 2004 victory in a recall referendum. Yet somehow Smartmatic International and its Venezuelan owners were able to purchase Sequoia last year without the deal receiving any scrutiny from federal regulators -- including the Treasury Department's Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS), which is tasked with determining whether foreign takeovers pose security risks.
CFIUS generally investigates such transactions only when the parties voluntarily submit themselves to review -- which Smartmatic did not do. But it retains the authority to initiate an investigation when it suspects a takeover compromises national security.
Smartmatic has a brief but controversial history. The company was started in Caracas during the late 1990s by engineers Antonio Mugica and Alfredo Anzola. They worked out of downtown Caracas providing small-scale technology services to Latin American banks. Despite having no election experience, the tiny company rocketed from obscurity in 2004 after it was awarded a $100 million contract by the Chávez-dominated National Electoral Council to replace Venezuela's electronic voting machines for the recall vote.
By Richard Brand
The greater threat to our nation's security comes not from Dubai and its pro-Western government, but from Venezuela, where software engineers with links to the leftist, anti-American regime of Hugo Chávez are programming electronic voting machines that will soon power U.S. elections.
Congress spent two weeks overreacting to news that Dubai Ports World would operate several American ports, including Miami's, but a better target for their hysteria would be the acquisition by Smartmatic International of California-based Sequoia Voting Systems, whose machines serve millions of U.S. voters. That Smartmatic -- which has been accused by Venezuela's opposition of helping Chávez rig elections in his favor -- now controls a major U.S. e-voting firm should give pause to anybody who thinks that replacing our antiquated butterfly ballots and hanging chads will restore Americans' faith in our electoral process.
Consider the lack of confidence Venezuelans have in their voting system. Anti-Chávez groups have such little faith in Smartmatic's machines that they refuse to run candidates in elections anymore as reports surface of fraud and irregularities from Chávez's 2004 victory in a recall referendum. Yet somehow Smartmatic International and its Venezuelan owners were able to purchase Sequoia last year without the deal receiving any scrutiny from federal regulators -- including the Treasury Department's Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS), which is tasked with determining whether foreign takeovers pose security risks.
CFIUS generally investigates such transactions only when the parties voluntarily submit themselves to review -- which Smartmatic did not do. But it retains the authority to initiate an investigation when it suspects a takeover compromises national security.
Smartmatic has a brief but controversial history. The company was started in Caracas during the late 1990s by engineers Antonio Mugica and Alfredo Anzola. They worked out of downtown Caracas providing small-scale technology services to Latin American banks. Despite having no election experience, the tiny company rocketed from obscurity in 2004 after it was awarded a $100 million contract by the Chávez-dominated National Electoral Council to replace Venezuela's electronic voting machines for the recall vote.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
According to the above article this program has been used to change elections for over 15 years... They had 15 years to refine it.... Everyone is talking about the presidential race ... What about the house and Senate races .. In some cases they are more important ..
Republican John James has launched a legal defense fund in hopes of challenging Michigan election results that netted his opponent Democrat Gary Peters winner in the state's most expensive senate race ever.
Working in tandem with the Republican National Committee, James' campaign believes late-counted ballots out of Wayne County led to election irregularities that could have influenced the results of the race.
Peters, currently leading James by almost 85,000 votes, was projected the winner late last week, after several days of uncertainty.
www.fox2detroit.com
Everyone knew this was a tight race from the beginning....
Republican John James has launched a legal defense fund in hopes of challenging Michigan election results that netted his opponent Democrat Gary Peters winner in the state's most expensive senate race ever.
Working in tandem with the Republican National Committee, James' campaign believes late-counted ballots out of Wayne County led to election irregularities that could have influenced the results of the race.
Peters, currently leading James by almost 85,000 votes, was projected the winner late last week, after several days of uncertainty.
John James launches legal defense fund as he contests Michigan election results
Republican John James has launched a legal defense fund to help litigate efforts to review election processes at the TCF Center in Detroit, where his campaign believes voter irregularities occurred.
Everyone knew this was a tight race from the beginning....
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Never guessed that Elizabeth warren and Amy kobachar are conspiracy theorists.
If trump somehow does win. CNN is mud. 0.000 credibility. They will crash and burn as more than half the country realizes what they really are.
If I were a trader, I would short CNN
If trump somehow does win. CNN is mud. 0.000 credibility. They will crash and burn as more than half the country realizes what they really are.
If I were a trader, I would short CNN
CNN is already for sale.
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
Word on the street is Bezos has a low ball personal bid figuring value will plummet if Trump does not prevail. Is CNN holding out figuring Trump will ultimately prevail and help their bottom line / worth? 4 billion asking vs 1 billion offer.
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
If I could buy CNN, I would and I'd let it burn. Money well spent.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Wisconsin Elections Commission Refuses to Do Recount Unless Trump Pays $7.9 Million Upfront
The Wisconsin Elections Commission is refusing to do a statewide recount unless President Donald Trump pays them $7.9 million upfront beforehand.
The $7.9 million is the cost estimate of the cost submitted by Wisconsin county clerks.
Advertisement - story continues below
“We still have not received any indication that there will or will not be a recount,” said Meagan Wolfe, Wisconsin’s chief election official. “But we want Wisconsin’s voters to know we are ready.”
Breaking 911 reports that “part of that readiness includes collecting recount cost estimates from all 72 counties and assembling a statewide estimate, which must be paid before any recount can begin.”
www.thegatewaypundit.com
The Wisconsin Elections Commission is refusing to do a statewide recount unless President Donald Trump pays them $7.9 million upfront beforehand.
The $7.9 million is the cost estimate of the cost submitted by Wisconsin county clerks.
Advertisement - story continues below
“We still have not received any indication that there will or will not be a recount,” said Meagan Wolfe, Wisconsin’s chief election official. “But we want Wisconsin’s voters to know we are ready.”
Breaking 911 reports that “part of that readiness includes collecting recount cost estimates from all 72 counties and assembling a statewide estimate, which must be paid before any recount can begin.”
Wisconsin Elections Commission Refuses to Do Recount Unless Trump Pays $7.9 Million Upfront * The Gateway Pundit * by Cassandra MacDonald
The Wisconsin Elections Commission is refusing to do a statewide recount unless President Donald Trump pays them $7.9 million upfront beforehand.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Celt
.450/400 Nitro Ex
If they cannot ensure a fair and accurate vote count, then they should be bearing the cost of any recount.Wisconsin Elections Commission Refuses to Do Recount Unless Trump Pays $7.9 Million Upfront
The Wisconsin Elections Commission is refusing to do a statewide recount unless President Donald Trump pays them $7.9 million upfront beforehand.
The $7.9 million is the cost estimate of the cost submitted by Wisconsin county clerks.
Advertisement - story continues below
“We still have not received any indication that there will or will not be a recount,” said Meagan Wolfe, Wisconsin’s chief election official. “But we want Wisconsin’s voters to know we are ready.”
Breaking 911 reports that “part of that readiness includes collecting recount cost estimates from all 72 counties and assembling a statewide estimate, which must be paid before any recount can begin.”
Wisconsin Elections Commission Refuses to Do Recount Unless Trump Pays $7.9 Million Upfront * The Gateway Pundit * by Cassandra MacDonald
The Wisconsin Elections Commission is refusing to do a statewide recount unless President Donald Trump pays them $7.9 million upfront beforehand.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
I know, I can see why.
Cavalry
.338 Win Mag
There were roughly 3.2 million votes cast in WI....so over $2 a vote to recount? Are the part time poll workers union with full benefits and a pension?
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I'll recount them all, personally, for half that.
If Trump does come away with the election, I want to see sanctions and/or arrests of the media controllers, sanctions against the media itself, every one of them that pushed the agenda.
It's time "news" became news again, and not chock-full of opinion pieces masquerading as news. If they aren't simply reporting the news, they cannot call themselves "the news".
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
I love the idea... However look at all the folks that tried a coup against this president ... They are all on book tours and making millions .. Consider us lucky just to keep Trump in office
Wisconsin Elections Commission Refuses to Do Recount Unless Trump Pays $7.9 Million Upfront
The Wisconsin Elections Commission is refusing to do a statewide recount unless President Donald Trump pays them $7.9 million upfront beforehand.
The $7.9 million is the cost estimate of the cost submitted by Wisconsin county clerks.
Advertisement - story continues below
“We still have not received any indication that there will or will not be a recount,” said Meagan Wolfe, Wisconsin’s chief election official. “But we want Wisconsin’s voters to know we are ready.”
Breaking 911 reports that “part of that readiness includes collecting recount cost estimates from all 72 counties and assembling a statewide estimate, which must be paid before any recount can begin.”
Wisconsin Elections Commission Refuses to Do Recount Unless Trump Pays $7.9 Million Upfront * The Gateway Pundit * by Cassandra MacDonald
The Wisconsin Elections Commission is refusing to do a statewide recount unless President Donald Trump pays them $7.9 million upfront beforehand.
This sure sounds like extortion to me.
"That's a nice election you have there. It would be a shame if something were to happen to it"
If the vote were contested and supported with proof they can either do the recount or have their entire voting history denied.
What happens if an entire State's worth of votes is rendered unusable?
If we don't clean house during this next Trump term then we might as well have let Biden have this one because the power will return to the swamp creatures and we will back on our way to socialism. We are closing in on the point of no return and the debt is going to push us over the edge.
What happens if quarter of the countries votes are unusable?
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Once Biden Gained the Lead with MASSIVE Vote Dumps, The Remainder of Votes All Possessed Same Biden to Trump Vote Ratio
we uncovered patterns within the data that made no sense.
In Pennsylvania we identified a strange pattern between the vote percentages between President Trump’s Election Day votes and his mail-in votes:
We have identified in at least two states that after large entries were made which provided for a lead for Joe Biden, all subsequent entries after that period of time had the exact same unusual ratio of Trump to Biden votes.
We reported last night that in Virginia in the election a number of large vote transactions or entries were recorded and reported in the voter data feed used by multiple Big Data companies to keep tabs on the election. Then after these large entries were dropped, the ratio of Biden to Trump in most all the remaining data feeds was the exact same ratio.
What’s really odd about these entries are the huge negative entries. One entry taking away 330,153.54 votes from Biden and 37,510.39 from Trump appears to have reversed an entry a few minutes that at around midnight. Then at 12:26 and 12:30am an entry in the amount of 308,341.59 from Biden and 80,357.05 from Trump was posted and reversed. The exact same amounts. A few hours later another 230,000 votes net were added to Biden’s lead.
After these entries noted above were recorded, nearly every entry made into the system for the Presidential election had the same proportion of votes of Biden to Trump. This too is not reasonable. There is nothing random about this. It is highly, highly unlikely that the results of all these entries would be at the same proportion. This too indicates fraud.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
we uncovered patterns within the data that made no sense.
In Pennsylvania we identified a strange pattern between the vote percentages between President Trump’s Election Day votes and his mail-in votes:
We have identified in at least two states that after large entries were made which provided for a lead for Joe Biden, all subsequent entries after that period of time had the exact same unusual ratio of Trump to Biden votes.
We reported last night that in Virginia in the election a number of large vote transactions or entries were recorded and reported in the voter data feed used by multiple Big Data companies to keep tabs on the election. Then after these large entries were dropped, the ratio of Biden to Trump in most all the remaining data feeds was the exact same ratio.
What’s really odd about these entries are the huge negative entries. One entry taking away 330,153.54 votes from Biden and 37,510.39 from Trump appears to have reversed an entry a few minutes that at around midnight. Then at 12:26 and 12:30am an entry in the amount of 308,341.59 from Biden and 80,357.05 from Trump was posted and reversed. The exact same amounts. A few hours later another 230,000 votes net were added to Biden’s lead.
After these entries noted above were recorded, nearly every entry made into the system for the Presidential election had the same proportion of votes of Biden to Trump. This too is not reasonable. There is nothing random about this. It is highly, highly unlikely that the results of all these entries would be at the same proportion. This too indicates fraud.
WE CAUGHT THEM! Part 5: In Competitive States, Once Biden Gained the Lead with MASSIVE Vote Dumps, The Remainder of Votes All Possessed Same Biden to Trump Vote Ratio -- THIS IS INCONCEIVABLE!
We’ve reported on multiple incidents of ‘glitches’ that people were observing related to the reporting of the 2020 Presidential Election. These incidents seem odd and so we sought out a data set from the 2020 Presidential election and we found it. A group of IT patriots had already analyzed a...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
They are saying Virginia was also messed with .....WTF... IF they did this to the president they can do it to the senate and House races also..
kev74
20×102mm Vulcan
kev74
20×102mm Vulcan
kev74
20×102mm Vulcan
