libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
This is actually quite serious. If we no longer have a right to choose encryption, by it being specifically forbidden, then there is no more privacy in 90%+ of our daily lives.
Not that most orgs we interact with won't talk to the government if asked, but because if you don't have the ability to encrypt locally and send to another private party, then not even you have the right to privacy outside of third parties.
Attacks on privacy are cowardly shows of the police state at work, and anti-american. It's a challenge, but that's like saying 2A is a challenge. It's not something we should take away just because it makes the job harder.
It would be, obviously, easy to police if we lived in a prison.
reclaimthenet.org
www.nextgov.com
Not that most orgs we interact with won't talk to the government if asked, but because if you don't have the ability to encrypt locally and send to another private party, then not even you have the right to privacy outside of third parties.
Attacks on privacy are cowardly shows of the police state at work, and anti-american. It's a challenge, but that's like saying 2A is a challenge. It's not something we should take away just because it makes the job harder.
It would be, obviously, easy to police if we lived in a prison.
FBI Director Wray Uses January 6th Capitol Riot to Call for Backdoors to Private Messaging Apps
Pushes for the end of private messages.
reclaimthenet.org
FBI Director Says Extremists Flocking to Encrypted Apps Poses New Challenges
Christopher Wray told lawmakers tech companies are the ones making policies about encryption.
www.nextgov.com
Last edited:
