List of gun control bills which passed in 2026

gunpoliticsny

gunpoliticsny

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,057
Reaction score
2,433
Location
Hudson Valley
List of gun control bills which passed in 2026.
  • A-3191A/S-10438, Allows physically disabled individuals who are not able to stand up to complete the two-hour live-fire range training course requirement for a concealed carry license while sitting.
  • A-1191B/S-1455B, Enacts the “Safer Weapons, Safer Homes Act”; requires the Division of Criminal Justice Services to study the technological viability of personalized firearms; defines personalized firearms; requires the division to report to the Governor and the legislature on the results of the study.
  • A-1962B/S-9629, Enacts “Francesco’s law” which establishes violations for the failure to safely store rifles, shotguns, and firearms in the presence of a minor or a prohibited person; requires the Office of Gun Violence Prevention to collect and analyze statistical and other information and data with respect to injuries or deaths of minors resulting from failure to safely store a firearm, rifle, or shotgun.
  • A-10005C/S-9005C, Public Protection and General Government Budget. Establishes crimes related to utilizing three-dimensional printers for manufacturing “ghost guns” and firearm components.
 
Cattafly

Cattafly

.40 S&W
Messages
173
Reaction score
195
Location
Wyoming County
JunkBoxFull said:
Where are the state commie terrorists with that bill/legislation/laws ?
I haven`t been able to find out much about it.
Click to expand...
It's not a "Glock" ban but is a ban on any firearm using a Cruciform trigger bar. Glock is just the most notable as it uses that part in almost all their firearms. That is the reason you will have a very hard time finding the usual Glock models and the reason Glock is producing V version models now. The law added and signed in the budget by our moron in chief is just a way of banning a gun without actually banning it.
 
libertysnake

libertysnake

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,860
Reaction score
16,438
Location
New York
Cattafly said:
It's not a "Glock" ban but is a ban on any firearm using a Cruciform trigger bar. Glock is just the most notable as it uses that part in almost all their firearms. That is the reason you will have a very hard time finding the usual Glock models and the reason Glock is producing V version models now. The law added and signed in the budget by our moron in chief is just a way of banning a gun without actually banning it.
Click to expand...

The thing is nothing will change till we end legislative immunity. I say this time and time again. Politicians will always make unconstitutional laws because even if SCOTUS knocks them down, they face no consequences or are liable to be sued for the period of ten or so years it holds.

If we are not immune from being prosecuted for our own decisions, why did we ever think it was a good idea to give such a power to those above us? That was one of our biggest mistakes we ever made in founding this country.
 
Cavalry

Cavalry

.338 Win Mag
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
9,591
Location
Behind Enemy Lines
Cattafly said:
It's not a "Glock" ban but is a ban on any firearm using a Cruciform trigger bar. Glock is just the most notable as it uses that part in almost all their firearms. That is the reason you will have a very hard time finding the usual Glock models and the reason Glock is producing V version models now. The law added and signed in the budget by our moron in chief is just a way of banning a gun without actually banning it.
Click to expand...
Glock and its clones are affected, I can think of no other brand with a cruciform trigger bar. The gen 5 has a cruciform trigger and I believe the gen 6 does as well.
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
32,076
Reaction score
68,014
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
libertysnake said:
The thing is nothing will change till we end legislative immunity. I say this time and time again. Politicians will always make unconstitutional laws because even if SCOTUS knocks them down, they face no consequences or are liable to be sued for the period of ten or so years it holds.

If we are not immune from being prosecuted for our own decisions, why did we ever think it was a good idea to give such a power to those above us? That was one of our biggest mistakes we ever made in founding this country.
Click to expand...
"We" never thought that was a good idea.

But the legislators decided on their own that "they can't do their jobs" if they don't have immunity.

And that spread to prosecutors, and all sorts of the people who implement those laws.

The right answer is "if you can't do your job without immunity, then we'll find someone who can. If we can't find anyone who can, then we'll either eliminate your job, or fix the flaws in the tort system".

Giving people immunity is like fixing a broken leg with morphine. The dude might have stopped screaming, but he isn't getting better.
 
Cooolone

Cooolone

.338 Win Mag
Messages
6,381
Reaction score
9,930
Location
NY, USA
So, Francesco's Law will be extension of the presence of a person, restrict and deny a others 2A Rights!? Simply amazing! How does such a law survive scrutiny (it wouldn't) when that old DC ruling clearly established that requiring or rendering a firearm useless within a home was an infringement upon 2A Rights and the Right to Defense!

Man oh Man...

Fuck NY!
 
Cavalry

Cavalry

.338 Win Mag
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
9,591
Location
Behind Enemy Lines
Cooolone said:
So, Francesco's Law will be extension of the presence of a person, restrict and deny a others 2A Rights!? Simply amazing! How does such a law survive scrutiny (it wouldn't) when that old DC ruling clearly established that requiring or rendering a firearm useless within a home was an infringement upon 2A Rights and the Right to Defense!

Man oh Man...

Fuck NY!
Click to expand...
How is this different than whats on the books already? I thought one already had to secure against people under 18 or a prohibited person?

I see we are still on the "incapable of being opened" and "fireproof" ridiculousness. The way I read it the penalty for violation is you will receive a brochure on safe storage???
 
Steal2B

Steal2B

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
28,572
Reaction score
87,675
Location
Dutchess County
Supreme Court punts on case against Leticia James for going around Federal Law to sue Gunmakers.

The fat ass ugly bitch pissed away our tax dollars to pay for this.

www.youtube.com

Breaking! SCOTUS Punts On Gun Case!

Join My Locals And Use Code "Wolverines" For One Month Free!https://johncrump.locals.comBusiness Deals: info@crumpy.com‘https://rumble.com/register/RealJohnC...
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com

www.nbcnews.com

Supreme Court turns away challenge to New York firearms liability law

A 2021 New York law allows gun manufacturers to be sued when their weapons are used in deadly shootings deemed to be a broad threat to public health in the state.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com
 
Last edited:
Cooolone

Cooolone

.338 Win Mag
Messages
6,381
Reaction score
9,930
Location
NY, USA
Cavalry said:
How is this different than whats on the books already? I thought one already had to secure against people under 18 or a prohibited person?

I see we are still on the "incapable of being opened" and "fireproof" ridiculousness. The way I read it the penalty for violation is you will receive a brochure on safe storage???
Click to expand...
It may not be any different... But the point is that "securing" firearms within your premises, let alone rendering them inoperable, is a subject already covered by the nations Highest court. Any of those nonsense "secondary" hurdles (defacto infringement via restrictions) has also been covered in the recent NYS Bruen decision! All those things done in the guise of "safety" are all fucking bullshit! Want to send an informational brochure, sure! Mandate by law, and institute fines or worse, go fuck yourself! Lol...

Might as well just leave a brick on your kitchen counter! Or wait, that could be used by a youth to smash someone's head open, better secure that too. No kitchen knives out and accessible, etc., etc.

Anyways... NY is gonna do what NY does...

Why do Dogs & Cats lick their balls?

Because they can! Same goes for NY Legislators!
 
Grimscale

Grimscale

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,579
Reaction score
16,824
Location
Rochester
Cooolone said:
Why do Dogs & Cats lick their balls?

Because they can! Same goes for NY Legislators!
Click to expand...
I completely believe that NY Legislators would lick dog & cat balls. Along with other, even more heinous and disgusting, behaviors.
Oh wait... you were using this as an analogy?



And, as far as SCOTUS punting on a 2A case, that's not "Breaking News", that's S.O.P.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top