List of gun control bills which passed in 2026

[gunpoliticsny]

List of gun control bills which passed in 2026.

• A-3191A/S-10438, Allows physically disabled individuals who are not able to stand up to complete the two-hour live-fire range training course requirement for a concealed carry license while sitting.
• A-1191B/S-1455B, Enacts the “Safer Weapons, Safer Homes Act”; requires the Division of Criminal Justice Services to study the technological viability of personalized firearms; defines personalized firearms; requires the division to report to the Governor and the legislature on the results of the study.
• A-1962B/S-9629, Enacts “Francesco’s law” which establishes violations for the failure to safely store rifles, shotguns, and firearms in the presence of a minor or a prohibited person; requires the Office of Gun Violence Prevention to collect and analyze statistical and other information and data with respect to injuries or deaths of minors resulting from failure to safely store a firearm, rifle, or shotgun.
• A-10005C/S-9005C, Public Protection and General Government Budget. Establishes crimes related to utilizing three-dimensional printers for manufacturing “ghost guns” and firearm components.

 

[Cavalry]

as well as the BS stuffed in the budget.

 

[Saltwater60]

Don’t forget the Glock Ban.

 

[JunkBoxFull]

Don’t forget the Glock Ban.

Where are the state commie terrorists with that bill/legislation/laws ?
I haven`t been able to find out much about it.

 

[Cattafly]

Where are the state commie terrorists with that bill/legislation/laws ?
I haven`t been able to find out much about it.

It's not a "Glock" ban but is a ban on any firearm using a Cruciform trigger bar. Glock is just the most notable as it uses that part in almost all their firearms. That is the reason you will have a very hard time finding the usual Glock models and the reason Glock is producing V version models now. The law added and signed in the budget by our moron in chief is just a way of banning a gun without actually banning it.

 

[fresch]

Hurry and pass all the "laws" so the criminals will follow them and we can be safe!
If only they would make murder illegal, then we would all be safe.

 

[libertysnake]

It's not a "Glock" ban but is a ban on any firearm using a Cruciform trigger bar. Glock is just the most notable as it uses that part in almost all their firearms. That is the reason you will have a very hard time finding the usual Glock models and the reason Glock is producing V version models now. The law added and signed in the budget by our moron in chief is just a way of banning a gun without actually banning it.

The thing is nothing will change till we end legislative immunity. I say this time and time again. Politicians will always make unconstitutional laws because even if SCOTUS knocks them down, they face no consequences or are liable to be sued for the period of ten or so years it holds.

If we are not immune from being prosecuted for our own decisions, why did we ever think it was a good idea to give such a power to those above us? That was one of our biggest mistakes we ever made in founding this country.

 

[Cavalry]

It's not a "Glock" ban but is a ban on any firearm using a Cruciform trigger bar. Glock is just the most notable as it uses that part in almost all their firearms. That is the reason you will have a very hard time finding the usual Glock models and the reason Glock is producing V version models now. The law added and signed in the budget by our moron in chief is just a way of banning a gun without actually banning it.

Glock and its clones are affected, I can think of no other brand with a cruciform trigger bar. The gen 5 has a cruciform trigger and I believe the gen 6 does as well.

 

[spat]

The thing is nothing will change till we end legislative immunity. I say this time and time again. Politicians will always make unconstitutional laws because even if SCOTUS knocks them down, they face no consequences or are liable to be sued for the period of ten or so years it holds.

If we are not immune from being prosecuted for our own decisions, why did we ever think it was a good idea to give such a power to those above us? That was one of our biggest mistakes we ever made in founding this country.

"We" never thought that was a good idea.

But the legislators decided on their own that "they can't do their jobs" if they don't have immunity.

And that spread to prosecutors, and all sorts of the people who implement those laws.

The right answer is "if you can't do your job without immunity, then we'll find someone who can. If we can't find anyone who can, then we'll either eliminate your job, or fix the flaws in the tort system".

Giving people immunity is like fixing a broken leg with morphine. The dude might have stopped screaming, but he isn't getting better.

 

[Cooolone]

So, Francesco's Law will be extension of the presence of a person, restrict and deny a others 2A Rights!? Simply amazing! How does such a law survive scrutiny (it wouldn't) when that old DC ruling clearly established that requiring or rendering a firearm useless within a home was an infringement upon 2A Rights and the Right to Defense!

Man oh Man...

Fuck NY!