holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Lindsay Clancy is now in the hands of a Massachusetts jury
- Thread starter holdover
- Start date
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Justice the way it should be done
dwa12479
.338 Win Mag
IF we'd have taught Civics (aka Social Studies) sufficiently in High School and shudder the notion, a refresher course to the Pool of prospective Jurors then the premise, responsibility, and Duty of a Juror might be better applied and understood, but the Judicial doesn't want average people from the community (Peers) sticking their noses into the workings of the Courts or prosecution as people are swayed by the performances of defense attorneys leading to DA's losing cases that cost time, money, and with enough failures, their Jobs.
Lindsay Clancy jury foreperson talks holdout: ‘He admitted he had reasonable doubt'
In the exclusive interview, which lasted over an hour, the jurors talked about the defense and the prosecution and the lengthy deliberations, as well as confirming what observers had inferred from the foreperson’s note, that there was a holdout juror, who left them frustrated — they said he wouldn’t listen to the rest of the panel. (read more)
…”He had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.”
Three Jurors in Lindsay Clancey Case Speak About Lone Holdout: "He had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children." - The Last Refuge
Is it a coincidence that during the COVID-19 controversies the largest loss in credibility fell upon the nursing and schoolteacher professions, while the jury in the Lindsay Clancey case were majority female nurses and teachers? Speaking to NBC in Boston, three of the female jurors speak out...theconservativetreehouse.com
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...ssachusetts-Juror-Strong-One-Against-Many.jpg
Long time ago there was an Organization whose mission was educating and proposing Law that reminded each Juror THEY had the Power of Nullification, they could decide if the Law was being properly applied, legitimate, or spot on.
Just think if one of us here were seated on a Jury Trial of someone being charged with having a Magazine that 11 rounds were stuffed into (and you know that things can be forced) YOU would have the Power to verdict "Not Guilty" because you decided the Law is unjust/unfairly applied/unconstitutional/etc. now the Judge isn't going to tell you that, he's going to instruct that you must follow the letter of the Law in deciding guilt and is done so under Color of Law as though YOU have no choice, well that's bullshit, you DO have the choice, and this man that held out might not have been sure if she was insane, but was sure she premeditated and executed three murders of innocent Children,...Of your opinion I know not, of this Trial we only only have what's been spoon fed up by the Media and those profiting from the scandal of it all, but if it were mine, well I'm not going to post words that could be used against me, but you're smart enough to figure it out.
Jury nullification - Wikipedia
I BELIEVE in God the Father, The Holy Spirit, and His Son Jesus Christ....many of us have spoken those words in profession of faith, yet we act as though Demonic forces were old mythology, that "it doesn't happen anymore" or those are just stories to frighten children and small minds, well I DO believe there are demonic forces at work, that there are evil and severely misguided people among us, that there are many who have become ignorant to everything outside what's specifically targeted towards formation of a predetermined opinion (see Delphi method) Delphi method - Wikipedia
The prospect of an invisible control over our minds (nefarious) so threatens many peoples paradigms that they'd rather dismiss than examine the possibility....well Brother let me tell you it's real, it's here, and it is influencing our lives and eventual destruction...
I am the worst Catholic ever, a piss-poor example of a Christian, and haven't read the Bible beyond verses that piqued my interest at the time, but my heart knows something's wrong, and it ain't good.
I think the problem is the 11 karens on the jury did precisely as you recommend. They thought the law was not being properly applied to Clancy.IF we'd have taught Civics (aka Social Studies) sufficiently in High School and shudder the notion, a refresher course to the Pool of prospective Jurors then the premise, responsibility, and Duty of a Juror might be better applied and understood, but the Judicial doesn't want average people from the community (Peers) sticking their noses into the workings of the Courts or prosecution as people are swayed by the performances of defense attorneys leading to DA's losing cases that cost time, money, and with enough failures, their Jobs.
Long time ago there was an Organization whose mission was educating and proposing Law that reminded each Juror THEY had the Power of Nullification, they could decide if the Law was being properly applied, legitimate, or spot on.
Just think if one of us here were seated on a Jury Trial of someone being charged with having a Magazine that 11 rounds were stuffed into (and you know that things can be forced) YOU would have the Power to verdict "Not Guilty" because you decided the Law is unjust/unfairly applied/unconstitutional/etc. now the Judge isn't going to tell you that, he's going to instruct that you must follow the letter of the Law in deciding guilt and is done so under Color of Law as though YOU have no choice, well that's bullshit, you DO have the choice, and this man that held out might not have been sure if she was insane, but was sure she premeditated and executed three murders of innocent Children,...Of your opinion I know not, of this Trial we only only have what's been spoon fed up by the Media and those profiting from the scandal of it all, but if it were mine, well I'm not going to post words that could be used against me, but you're smart enough to figure it out.
Jury nullification - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Without doubt it works both ways and not always for the betterment, but the founding of this Country hinged our Rights on setting one guilt man free rather than a single innocent man punished.
I find the murder of those children reprehensible and inexcusable, and while the Natural Man within calls out for her punishment, we may have to accept her spending the rest of her life in a mental institution, even IF she is/was insane, she can never be allowed to roam free again...wasn't just Blacks that were lynched back in the day and it's said what was old becomes new again.
The "Karens" are a symptom of affluent white women being demonically influenced...what other explanation can we find for this aberrant, radical behavior?
Bad enough they've demanded the Right to abort a child, but now they want it excusable to murder them when their hormones combined with drugs causes them to completely derail....hey, remember that thing about SSRI's being responsible for School Shootings; the same ones shifted to dysfunctional trans persons and democrats who just can't tolerate people that disagree with their opinions of how things should be.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
In the old days they would just burn them
"MP"
Fire is an excellent motivator!