The only way he would walk is if they changed their mind about his likely guilt.
If they were still reasonably confident he was the right guy, they would have charged him with something just to hold him, even if it was something petty.
The left *has* to do that to maintain their "only the professionals can handle this" narrative.
If they went with the truth of "the professionals won't arrive in time to do anything but clean up the mess, you're on your own till then", it would absolutely destroy the doctrine they are trying to...
Every time one of the dems introduces impeachment proceedings against Trump or a conservative, one of the Republicans should introduce impeachment proceedings against one of the activist judges.
Boasberg would be a good place to start.
Enough time has passed that the people in charge don't remember the last one first hand. So they think they can "win".
It's an inescapable cycle.
They just don't get that everyone loses (except defense contractors). The only question is how badly.
Which article of the constitution authorized martial law again I forget ?
Anyone from NY of all places should know that if all a government needs to do to violate some rights is yell "emergency", then there will always be an emergency.
It wasn't legal when FDR did it, it wasn't even legal when...
Has he tried applying at that big new Gender Studies plant in Green Bay ?
Maybe capitalism is working exactly the way it's supposed to be, and it's your degree that's worthless ?
The cost of keeping cash around is the 3-10% it evaporates every year due to inflation.
Imagine if you'd stuck $10k in cash under your mattress for Y2k and just left it there.
That $10k would have lost nearly 50% of it's value. It would still be $10k, but it would only buy the same stuff that...
We need to stop referring to them as illegal immigrants. Start calling them colonizers, that's the modern leftist term for people who move to a new land and refuse to assimilate isn't it ?
The constitution says the president *is* the executive branch. Everyone else is just an assistant.
Literally every iota of power any of them has is delegated from POTUS, and *only* from POTUS.
The legislature cannot create any executive authority that isn't vested in the POTUS. How POTUS...
Japanese internment was not legal, not in any way shape or form.
If it was legal to imprison people just because their grandfather was from a country we happen to be at war with, then it would be legal to just round up all the white people and lock them in camps because "social justice" too.
Democracy is a terrible system. It's the worst, except for all the others.
Our founding fathers wise solution did *not* build a system based on universal sufferage. History may record our meddling with that as the ultimate cause of our downfall.
I think the thing with the Epstein files is that the whole world order would burn to the ground if they were released in full.
Where I disagree with Trump is I say that's a price worth paying, and I think he's scared of the power vacuum it would leave.
And slavery, the 3/5ths compromise, Japanese internment, Jim Crow, The Trail of Tears, confiscation of privately held gold, etc, etc...
By your logic, the holocaust was perfectly fine because it followed all the German laws at rhe time.
Unfortunately he needn't be present, he just had to issue the order personally.
He could have phoned it in from the beach and it would have still been valid.
Just bring Biden in for questioning in front of congress about it.
Show him a bunch of documents and ask if he authorized those signatures.
Include a bunch that you just made up.
Have them get progressively more ridiculous as you get to the bottom of the pile.
When Biden testifies under oath...
Ftlbs is from the ammo, not the rifle anyway.
"I just download my 20mm Lhati L-39 to 1500fps and it good to go".
Oh, that other 20x138 ammo isn't for the rifle, it's just for the collection value.
I do have to say I really appreciate the "muzzle angry" typo. That should be an official unit...
The real question about liability insurance is:
"Didn't NY already outlaw liability insurance ?"
Are they going to mandate something they already prohibited ?
There are a lot of legal issues with trying to do that.
But using their own network to give them the run around is perfectly legal, even for common citizens.
Download their app, and start reporting stuff that doesn't exist.
Get a lot of other people to coordinate the misreporting. Send their...
So, you're saying power is legitimacy and that's it ?
There is a social contract in the US, and it derives from the declaration of independence. If the principles enshrined in it are violated, then there is no legitimacy for the government that has resulted.
Or, do you think Al Capone was the...
The president can sign the documents using any means he chooses, autopen included.
But, there's a lot of evidence that Biden wasn't the one signing these.
Basically, if the president says "sign these pardons with the autopen" that's kosher.
If some underling just says "use the autopen to sign...
If ICE was smart, they would get a bunch of people to corrupt the surveillance network driving this stuff.
Then use that to trigger protests at places of their choosing, while conducting real operations elsewhere.
Drain the resources or the resistance network.
"We're going into neighborhood...
She has participated in several other interviews etc where the interviewer tries to get her to apologize for basically being a good looking white girl and she has handled them very well, essentially telling the interviewer where to stick their line of questioning.
Anyone claiming illegal immigrants can't get "X" benefit is basically lying.
They can't *legally* get the benefit, but they can't *legally* even be here.
Someone who is using a stolen identity to support their day to day existence can certainly use the same to fraudulently claim benefits...
An escort is paid to screw the client. A lobbiest is paid by the client to screw large groups of other people.
I guess that makes them more like porn stars.
Bonnie Blue's got nothing on the average lobbiest.
NO.
That is the antithesis of everything the US stands for.
*THE PEOPLE* are the boss. The government, to include SCOTUS, exists for the sole reason of safeguarding the rights of the people.
When they get it wrong, it is "the right of the people to alter or abolish" that government. That...
Citing the decisions of a court that has gotten so much wrong in the past isn't convincing.
The 2A says what it says, regardless of who says otherwise. No amount of pagentry or appeals to authority will change that.
On top of that, the 2A just *recognizes* the *fundamental human right* to...
Slaves were 3/5ths of a person until they weren't.
The people hiding Anne Frank were criminals.
The people who sent her to the death camp were just doing their job enforcing the law.
None of that is any more constitutional than FDRs internment of citizens with Japanese ancestors, or his confiscation of gold.
Just because the government gets away with violating the constitution doesn't change what it means and says.
Robbing a bank is still a crime, even if you get away with...
Because while there is a general exodus from the state, there is an even greater exodus from NYC.
So there are net people moving out of NYC and moving upstate.
They do have the English bill of rights from 1689 that guarantees an RKBA (limited to protestants, and weapons suitable to self defense, but an RKBA none the less), ours was derived from that.
Bill of Rights 1689 - Wikipedia Bill of Rights 1689 - Wikipedia
AI might upend the entire apple cart in the next 10 or 20 years.
Things might go *very* sideways depending on how that shakes out.
You could have a situation where productivity goes through the roof, so prices plummet all over the place, but at the same time most people won't be able to find...
The trick is I don't think I'll see the "get better" side of that in my lifetime, so I'd prefer the "get worse" side proceed as slowly as possible.
But, for sure, it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.
That's what the controversy is about here.
Trump's DOJ is pursuing the argument that it's still a tax even at $0.
And since SCOTUS already upheld a tax that you're not allowed to pay at all in the '86 shenanigans, it's not clear that they will reach the only logical conclusion here.
Maybe...