Search results

The answer is neither. I wouldn't want to live in a puppet state or any state targeted by U.S. for regime change.

FYI, more than half of this world is ruled by some kind of regime and Europe still has Royalties. U.S. doesn't have a reverse gear and still can't forgive NK for not being able to defeat them. Making positive changes starts with being honest with oneself and fair to others. At least Trump...

Without sanctions and defense budget to counter our threat, NK could live a lot better. We do this a lot. Undermine the economy of a country and accuse it of not providing for their people. That's pissing on their boots and telling them it's raining. This was the plan for Russia, narrated ad...

It's an undeniable fact. Personally I don't give a fuck who gets offended. Someone needs to throw arrogant assholes off their high horse. North Korea is self-ruled, South Korea is occupied by U.S. and defacto a puppet state.

We occupy half of Korea and threaten the other half for 70 plus years. Maybe if this wasn't the case N.K. would need nukes.

What's even more ironic, the on!y country that used nukes, gets to say who can have them and who can't.

This is because most people use regular stocks and are not facing a firing squad. Making this product pointless. They can control what you can buy in NYS, but they can't control how you use it, if it is not involved in crime. Hard to enforce red herring laws against end users.

Bullshit. There were protests in pre-Soviet Russia, Soviet Russia and post-Soviet Russia. The difference is they were inspired by actual grievances, not by two political parties playing games and the media going out of its way to publicize them.

Uh oh the sky is falling. Retarded democracy.

Big yawn and fart from me. It's a standard operating procedure in American politics. Out of power political party uses protests and mild civil unrest, blowing smoke up the asses of young and/or stupid to create vote generating movements. Eight years ago it was police brutality. Now it's...

I don't do this myself, but over the years accumulated the following. Nickel plated bullet on the right gets a lot of use rounding deformed case mouths before sizing. The rest just sits on the bench taking up space.

A hundred dollar drone can take out multi-million dollar strategic bomber. A pair of scissors can take out a drone. Unbelievable how warfare is changing. https://www.rt.com/russia/618783-drone-scissors-ukraine-fibre/

Also on Kherson,Tirnopol and few other cities. It was the biggest attack since April. Supposedly this is retaliation for the Ukrainian attacks on railroad bridges and passenger train. Retaliation for drone attacks on strategic bombers may still to come. Ukraine is threatening sea drone attacks...

Possible? Yes. Proven? No.

There are two million Ukrainians who fled to Russia since 2014 and both countries also have many family ties from Soviet era. It's a fertile ground for sabotage, spying and terrorism. A nightmare for FSB.

Israel doesn't have their own problems to deal with, they needed to attack Russia? Israel doesn't even participate in sanctions, much less staging attacks against Russia. BTW, none of the Russian pundits are blaming Israel.

I don' t think Putin would telegraph any retaliation plan even if he trusted Trump, which I doubt. Did Trump know and approved Ukrainian attacks on Russia's strategic bombers? Opinions are split.

Almost pregnant.

Western countries will not submit their troops to the same casualty rates as Ukraine or Russia, especially when they are not invaded.

Taliban would disagree with your assessment of NATO.

Does the word "Oreshnik" ring a bell?

Non sequitur.

I don't speak for Medvedev.

Unleash Medvedev.

Also, this happened as two U.S. senators (Graham and Blumenthal) arrived in Kiev and saber rattled. They knew.

No way this is Ukrainian operation. What is also suspicious, Trump criticized only Putin when both sides attacked each other with drones few days ago. So this would look like Ukrainian retaliation instead of escalation. U.S is a participant in the conflict, not a mediator. Trump may be doing...

Troop levels are only a fraction of what they were during WWII to cover distances that haven't changed. Also the territories gained need to be absorbed and secured.

While Trump is trying to bring peace to Eastern Europe, Germany is doing everything to sabotage any possibility of a peace deal. Fourth Reich signed a deal with Ukraine to build and finance a long range missile factory in Ukraine. What can possibly go wrong with that, right.

We may never know, but it is easy to tell when the number is made up.

This number is way off, considering how many Russian troops were actually on the frontline.

It was never an all out war. This is why it is called special military operation. Destroying Ukraine was never a goal, but it is an option.

Russia has Oreshniks, which can wipe out anything in Ukraine and Europe without nuclear payload.

Rats abandoning sinking ship. They went to a Russian Safari and crapped their panties.

The war with NATO is already going on.

Since these missiles are operated by NATO military personnel. Any such attack can be considered an act of war, making all NATO bases a legitimate target. If Trump is on board with this decision, he is an idiot.

Russia will never accept a hostile terrorist state next door, on its historic territory, populated by their own ethnos.

Who is providing intel?

WTF is this?

I am glad we agree.

I don't owe you any explanation.

Don't remember a single instance of retired Soviet general going on television to promote genocide and terrorism, unlike Pentagon schizophrenics.

What bothers you the most, is you know I am right.

Soviet system with all of its flaws, was much better than what came after. Soviet leaders who didn't trust the West were 100% right. They are vindicated by history.

Open a Webster's dictionary and look up righteousness. It might enlighten your small mind.

Sitting on a high horse is not the same as high ground.

They couldn't even put up a good resistance to our meddling and propaganda, much less trying to destroy us. They backed civil rights movement. It won, US is still standing. Accusing countries that don't have the means or desire to destroy the US is a part of American schizophrenia. There was...

You are laughable. Even U.S. establishment takes credit for destroying the Soviet Union. They wear it as a badge of honor and all the people who died in wars on posts Soviet territory as a result mean nothing. Any lives outside U.S. borders mean nothing.

Soviet Union destroyed by U.S. Yugoslavia destroyed by U.S. Syria destroyed by U.S. Iraq destroyed by U.S. Afghanistan destroyed by U.S. Libya destroyed by U.S. Remind me again who is the villain.

Hollow ideological drivel for indoctrinated old farts. KGB were Boy Scouts compared to the CIA. Newly released admission that CIA tempered with food shipments to the Soviet Union deserves a closer look. While Voice of America (CIA cutout) was broadcasting how they care about freedoms and well...