Search results

Wherever this came from (you offered no context), it does not apply to NY.

A rifle is not a firearm.

That article didn't explain anything. What exactly did they pass?

Well I tried. You're wrong, refuse to admit it, and anything you've said or will say on this matter is pure stupidity.

I literally know what I said above for a fact, so... I get that you're all beat down, we all are, and I get that there are horror stories out there, but what I said is 100% factual. It's a routine process here. He did not break a law, that's why he wasn't arrested. NYC's long gun permits are...

Incorrect in this case. He can easily get it back by re-registering as long as the DV case is cleared. It can all be done directly through the license division which will then release it from the property clerk.

He can depending on how the DV aspect plays out. The tweets are stupid, the captains do that. I have refused to be in a few pictures when it has happened here.

No arrests were made because it’s not an arrestable offense. In many cases, with actual bad cops, an arrest is made anyway. So these cops actually knew the law and followed it correctly.

Nope.

I’m always going to be willing to remove a firearm from a DV household when the camera the cop hating public demanded we wear records someone in that household saying, “He has an illegal gun.” No one will ever convince me that makes me an “oathbreaker”. Domestic Violence officers don’t come to...

“It” is not my source.

Wife tells cops husband has unregistered gun, NYgunforum blames cops. Seems legit. I stop on average 2-3 gun confiscations similar to this one every month (I'm the DV sgt at a different precinct on the Island). I wouldn't have stopped this one. No shot my cops and I get in trouble for yours...

Again, it doesn't work that way. Menacing is not in practice what you guys think it is.

My club president is one of the plaintiffs in this case. I overheard him talking about it at our last USPSA match. I’m fairly certain I heard him telling someone else that the attorneys said there’s no stopping it now that Scotus has accepted the case.

There’s no turning back now. They’re going to rule on it, they’re going to rule in our favor on it, and they’re going to use this case to upend a lot of bullshit infringements that previous courts have ignored.

We’ve discussed menacing a million times here. “NY” can’t invoke anything. A complaintant would have to express an articulable fear of immediate physical injury. Menacing is not the slippery slope you guys make it out to be. I’ve never once seen menacing “misused”, and it’s one of the most...

That “assault” definition makes no sense and is a strange aspect of nationwide laws wherein states like NY require physical injury to commit assault while others seem to define assault as the action of harassing someone (as defined in NY). For once I think we have it right.

Suck my... Ooops, take that back. I just saw where the writer is from.

I don’t know man. I prefer my enemies dead. Think of Austin Powers (or any other movie really). When you have your enemy suspended over a shark tank, just fucking drop them in!!! If movies taught me anything, its that your nemesis will always escape if you waste time gloating! ;)

Things are getting pretty bad for you Diane. You should probably just die already.