This is the problem here. And at the last place. Not an honest argument to be found. Very few people willing to engage in anything beyond "no want Shrillary"; "O'Bummer is a Libtard".
Not sure if it's ignorance, dependence on the sound byte news culture or something else. But this blind...
Honestly it kills me that you dont see all government as immoral. It's all using the threat of violence to force people to bend to their will. It appears that you're ok with that as long as it supports your views.
Not participating doesnt make it worse. I dont like their guy or your guy. They both want to make government bigger and advance violence or threats thereof upon their own citizens.
So by living in this country I automatically consent to unconstitutional laws and theft via taxation? OK. Got it. You never answered my question from this morning.
I refuse to vote not because my voice doesnt matter, but because voting indicates consent to be governed by these shitstains. I could care less about them or their laws. I am a moral and free man and refuse to vote for my new master.
How has the first impacted you? Specifically. Not "she would have done..." No wall (not that I want one), more anti gun legislation than Obama, no "lock her up". He hasn't done shit but tweet
I have running water because I have a well connected to a giant aquifer, which is common in the NE US...
@Celt I disagree that "people" ruined it. Politicians did by corrupting themselves and others in order to enrich themselves. We trust them to do certain things and they do the opposite.
You have lots of choices to minimize how the government steals from you. From renting vs. owning, to registering your car in another state that doesnt have inspections or exorbitant registration fees. Try paying some folks in cash vs credit card. Try offering customers different rates for cash...
Not writing in names. Voting simply shows you condone the corrupt system our government has become. If you somehow think all of this government is necessary, I don't understand you. There is zero need for 99.999999% of our government. They screw up everything they touch and they corrupt the...
If your meaning is the standard false dichotomy of "one asshole is better than the other", you need to brush up on logic, politics and economics.
I think.
Yeah. IMO @Carlos Hathcock called it. Meeting with them carries the assumption that they are trying to represent you the constituent. They dont. You dont enrich them. You are merely someone to be tolerated.
It's a big club. And you ain't in it.
Yep. Dude is doing this intentionally. I'd suggest ignoring going forward. Since OP isnt engaging in their inflammatory thread, this should probably be closed.
The bill of rights was about what the government couldn't do, not what the citizens could.
That being said, all governments corrupt themselves eventually, so it's kind of a moot point.