"AW" bans and Magazine cap. limits - next

[RDN]

NY and California's magazine cap. limit 2nd & 9th Circuit court
Maryland's "Assault Weapon" 4th Circuit court
US high Court rules "2 step" approach and Intermediate Scrutiny can't be used to deny law abiding citizen 2nd Amend. rights.

 

[Deplorable Me]

We can only hope.

 

[redtail]

 

[C3D]

Today's decision was clearly written by both the majority and the concurring justices to let us know that AWB and magazine challenges will be unsuccessful.

 

[ArmedCorgi]

Today's decision was clearly written by both the majority and the concurring justices to let us know that AWB and magazine challenges will be unsuccessful.

?? Do you mean, that they will be struck down or that the supreme court would uphold them?

 

[Edwardteach72]

Today's decision was clearly written by both the majority and the concurring justices to let us know that AWB and magazine challenges will be unsuccessful.

How???? Lmfao

 

[meketrefe]

Interesting to see if the 2A is seen as a "less important" right?
Some illiterate liberals think this is possible w/o even changing the constitution.
We know the 1A is being raped on a daily basis so maybe rights are moving slowly into the privilege status/ territory.

 

[96coal449]

Nothing to see here. Move along.

Now back to our regularly scheduled program.

 

[MikeyCNY]

My body is ready but my wallet isn't.

 

[Edwardteach72]

My body is ready but my wallet isn't.

I dont think the supply chain is ready..

If you look at how it was affected for freedom week in California.. the amount of magazines bough on just that one week in that one state

 

[Saltwater60]

I could see mag limits getting overturned. It sure was eluded to. What the Supreme Court's new gun rights ruling means

 

[That_FNG]

This is the time to go the offensive. Seize the day and go for broke.

 

[Edwardteach72]

This is the time to go the offensive. Seize the day and go for broke.

FPC already has been working on this for months now

 

[ArmedCorgi]

This is the time to go the offensive. Seize the day and go for broke.

Yes. I think dispite the recent aparent failing in the Senate, the overall trend has been in our favor.

 

[Podmonkey]

Actually I think the next step should be National Reciprocity. It's difficult to argue against when universal shall issue is the law of the land.
Reciprocity also opens up a soild avenue of attack against magazine limits which in turn becomes a stepping stone for attacking AW bans. National Reciprocity would also likely lead to National Constitutional Carry in short order.

 

[fresch]

Time for freedom, buy what you want, misuse them pay the price. The price being death.

 

[Saltwater60]

Time for freedom, buy what you want, misuse them pay the price. The price being death.

I just told my wife last night the only thing I think is reasonable is background checks to keep guns out of the hands of mentally I’ll and dangerous/violent felons. That’s it and then anyone else should be able to have anything reasonable. I drew the line at high explosives and should mounted rocket launchers.

 

[camper4lyfe]

This is the time to go the offensive. Seize the day and go for broke.

There are several cases that were stayed pending the ruling on Bruen. I'd imagine they'll be un-stayed (I don't know what the opposite if stayed is) soon enough.

 

[nobody]

Today's decision was clearly written by both the majority and the concurring justices to let us know that AWB and magazine challenges will be unsuccessful.

The Supreme Court expressly said that NY's permitting system was unconstitutional and the immediate effect of their opinion applies to that permit process.

They then went on for another eighty pages explaining that they do not favor a two-step, or intermediate scrutiny with regard to restraint of the 2nd. They explained why, citing the text of the law and historical precedent back to the 1600's. They indicated that strict scrutiny analysis should be applied to those rights enumerated by our founding documents.

That gives petitioners cause to re-litigate every single restraint of the 2nd that has been previously defended using the intermediate scrutiny analysis. A Supreme Court opinion opens the door to seek relief and injunctions from Federal courts in friendly jurisdictions.

Now is the time to support those groups that are actually fighting to defend your God given rights. Now is the time to stand up and demand the government respect your free exercise of those rights.

 

[FRB]

I drew the line at high explosives and should mounted rocket launchers.

Why, some of us love playing with these....

Helped set this one up:

This one is only 2 minutes 21 seconds long, watch till the end "don't tell me there is more? haha This was good friends at work:

 

[camper4lyfe]

The Supreme Court expressly said that NY's permitting system was unconstitutional and the immediate effect of their opinion applies to that permit process.

They then went on for another eighty pages explaining that they do not favor a two-step, or intermediate scrutiny with regard to restraint of the 2nd. They explained why, citing the text of the law and historical precedent back to the 1600's. They indicated that strict scrutiny analysis should be applied to those rights enumerated by our founding documents.

That gives petitioners cause to re-litigate every single restraint of the 2nd that has been previously defended using the intermediate scrutiny analysis. A Supreme Court opinion opens the door to seek relief and injunctions from Federal courts in friendly jurisdictions.

Now is the time to support those groups that are actually fighting to defend your God given rights. Now is the time to stand up and demand the government respect your free exercise of those rights.

It wasn't NY's permitting system that was unconstitutional, it was NYC's (and other similar cities) requirement to show a "special need" (I can never remember the specific term used) to have a permit. The requirement to show that there was something that made you special above a normal person was deemed unconstitutional.

 

[nobody]

That is correct, but the point remains.

 

[Edwardteach72]

The Supreme Court expressly said that NY's permitting system was unconstitutional and the immediate effect of their opinion applies to that permit process.

No SCOTUS said the "proper cause" violated the 2nd and 14th amendment.

 

[spat]

I just told my wife last night the only thing I think is reasonable is background checks to keep guns out of the hands of mentally I’ll and dangerous/violent felons. That’s it and then anyone else should be able to have anything reasonable. I drew the line at high explosives and should mounted rocket launchers.

If you know some guy is too dangerous to be allowed to have a gun, then he should be locked up, because no law will stop him from getting one.


Don't make the leftist mistake of thinking laws are there to prevent crime. They are there to facilitate punishing criminals after the fact, and segregating the worst of them from society.

That is all they can ever do.

Trying to write laws that will make a future crime more difficult to commit is the path to tyranny.

 

[RDN]

SCOTUS on a tear this week. Basically telling Gun-grabbing Baby Killer Liberals - F^@*k you!!
With these new instructions to the lower courts not to use "2 step" or intermediate process in regard to 2nd Amend.
IMO - NY's SAFE act is null and voided!

 

[Edwardteach72]

SCOTUS on a tear this week. Basically telling Gun-grabbing Baby Killer Liberals - F^@*k you!!
With these new instructions to the lower courts not to use "2 step" or intermediate process in regard to 2nd Amend.
IMO - NY's SAFE act is null and voided!

Nice.copy and paste

 

[That_FNG]

Maybe

SCOTUS on a tear this week. Basically telling Gun-grabbing Baby Killer Liberals - F^@*k you!!
With these new instructions to the lower courts not to use "2 step" or intermediate process in regard to 2nd Amend.
IMO - NY's SAFE act is null and voided!

maybe liberals will be so distracted by abortions not happening that they will forget all about guns

 

[Saltwater60]

If you know some guy is too dangerous to be allowed to have a gun, then he should be locked up, because no law will stop him from getting one.


Don't make the leftist mistake of thinking laws are there to prevent crime. They are there to facilitate punishing criminals after the fact, and segregating the worst of them from society.

That is all they can ever do.

Trying to write laws that will make a future crime more difficult to commit is the path to tyranny.

I have no problem with that at all, but it won’t happen.

 

[Saltwater60]

SCOTUS on a tear this week. Basically telling Gun-grabbing Baby Killer Liberals - F^@*k you!!
With these new instructions to the lower courts not to use "2 step" or intermediate process in regard to 2nd Amend.
IMO - NY's SAFE act is null and voided!

That’s the way it seems. We will see how it plays out.

 

[Edwardteach72]