www.theepochtimes.com
To what?
They are always bad. No matter what side of the fence you are on.
Oh no, not court...
Will that be before or after the election lawsuits?
Biden cited gun control as an example, saying that if he signed an executive order banning assault weapons, a future Republican president could undo that ban and use it as a precedent to drastically expand gun rights.
"We do that, next guy comes along and says, 'Well, guess what? By executive order, I guess everybody can have machine guns again,' " he said. "So we gotta be careful."
Audio of the call, obtained by The Intercept's Ryan Grim, was included in the publication's "Deconstructed" podcast Thursday, and at further length in a report on the progressive outlet's website
Biden told civil rights leaders in private meeting that progressives' hopes for executive actions are 'way beyond the bounds' of his presidential auth
By Eric Bradner, CNN (CNN) -- President-elect Joe Biden expressed skepticism about his powers to implement his agenda by executive action Tuesday in a private virtual meeting with civil rights leaderswww.cbs58.com
That is because Donny boy's policies were good for the country, aimed at reducing taxes, reducing regulation, reducing illegal immigration, negotiating new trade deals favorable to us. Biden's policies are all the exact opposite. If a politician's policies are favorable to me I naturally support them, if they are not favorable to me I naturally won't. This is not hypocrisy, it is logic.
Bump stock ban, don't forget that. We must hold all politicians accountable for all their actions, even (or especially) those we support.
Hey assmunch! What Executive Orders were good for the United States and which were bad? Not a fan of E.O but this is a no brainer.
You know the other side is saying the opposite.
The "other side" is objectively, demonstrably wrong so what they say is as relevant as tge babblings of an infant. Executive order has always been a power vested in the president, just not to the extent it has grown to now.
It is a no brainer. None of them are good. It's an exercise of power outside the powers granted by the constitution. I think that going around the constitutional process, regardless of the content of such EOs is bad.
I disagree, EO's can be good and as such should be followed up with legislation thru congress. But that would require congress to get off their biased ass's and actually do something good for this country instead of the party!
Some here are simply pointing out the hypocrisy. Biden was very adamant in what very little campaigning he did that EOs were for dictators. And as soon as he's in office he's signed over 30 of them in his first 60 days. EOs have their place, but the proper method for getting things done the right way is through Congress.
Agreed, they have their place, but are too often abused. Just like the Message of Necessity in NY. But hey, that got the Tappan Zee bridge named in a hurry....
Was there any support for an executive order in the past specifically? Maybe supporting the action of the executive action but I find it hilarious how the Supreme Court said Trump couldn’t get rid of DACA by executive action when obama created it by executive action.
