BREAKING: GOP Virginia Lawmaker Doused in Gasoline, Set on Fire in His Office – Attacker Identified and in Custody

[livingston]

BREAKING: GOP Virginia Lawmaker Doused in Gasoline, Set on Fire in His Office – Attacker Identified and in Custody​

A Danville, Virginia, City Councilman Lee Vogler was doused in gasoline and set on fire in his office on Tuesday.
Danville City councilman Lee Vogler was at his place of work at Showcase Magazine when he was attacked.


According to reports, the attacker, identified as Shotsie Michael Buck Hayes, 29, of Danville, threw five gallons of gasoline on Vogler before setting him on fire.

Showcase Magazine’s Andrew Brooks said the attacker forced his way in the magazine’s office as Vogler was visiting and poured a five-gallon container of gas on him.

GOP Virginia Lawmaker Doused in Gasoline, Set on Fire in His Office - Attacker Identified and in Custody | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Danville, Virginia, City Councilman Lee Vogler was doused in gasoline and set on fire in his office on Tuesday.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[S&W Fan]

Peoples situational awareness these days seems to be virtually nonexistent. How is it that nobody noticed someone entering a building with a 5 gallon pail of gas?? Gas weighs just over 6lbs. Per gallon so the perp was carrying approx. 30+ pounds of liquid . Not too heavy but it should have been obviously awkward looking to say the least.

 

[tirwin1]

Asshole should have the same thing done to him.

 

[pshift]

Here is probable cause:

Hayes' wife Mary Alice Buck-Hayes filed for divorce from him just two weeks ago. The couple only appeared to have married in 2023.

 

[TEOTWAWKI inc.]

Here is probable cause:

Hayes' wife Mary Alice Buck-Hayes filed for divorce from him just two weeks ago. The couple only appeared to have married in 2023.

Maybe the councilman was banging dude's wife?

 

[fresch]

If so the wife is at fault, it is her oath and trust that she destroyed.

 

[Celt]

Eye for an eye. The attacker should be doused in gasoline and set on fire.

Maybe then people will rethink their actions.

 

[FP1201]

Eye for an eye. The attacker should be doused in gasoline and set on fire.

Maybe then people will rethink their actions.

Attacking and deliberately setting someone on fire is arson and reason enough to extinguish their candle. Policy prohibition or not, concealed is concealed.

 

[spat]

Attacking and deliberately setting someone on fire is arson and reason enough to extinguish their candle. Policy prohibition or not, concealed is concealed.

If they had a policy prohibiting him from carrying, he should sue them for putting him in this situation because of their dangerous policy.

"Good intentions" isn't a defense when you expose someone to a danger.

 

[GOYABEAN]

Either string him up quickly or one to the because life in prison will be a gift of life. He's proven to be unfit for society!

 

[Saltwater60]

How does one stand there long enough to have gas dumped on them, the container placed on the ground and them lit on fire? Run or hug the bastard, just don’t shoot em. It was a 5 gallon container so not small.

 

[Beerman]

I have questions.

 

[Zerex]

3rd degree burns are very painful, and many times result in infection and death.

Shotsie may be insane, or inbred.

 

[Mosinitis]

Jealousy can make normal people do crazy things. When screwing someone's wife that needs to be understood. Sounds like play stupid games win stupid prices case, if that's what happened.

 

[2WheelGnnr]

hmmm that dude over there carry a pail with something in it...Huh...who am I to stop or ask even though it looks odd as hell..........but hmmm......do you smell gas???

 

[Grimscale]

According to reports, the attacker, identified as Shotsie Michael Buck Hayes, 29, of Danville, threw five gallons of gasoline on Vogler before setting him on fire.

Showcase Magazine’s Andrew Brooks said the attacker forced his way in the magazine’s office as Vogler was visiting and poured a five-gallon container of gas on him.

So which is it? There is a significant difference between the two behaviors.

The first implies an open container for fast ejection of the liquid. The second implies Vogler sat still while someone slowly poured gas out.

And, if it is true he "forced his wat into the magazine's office" then it would imply people DID see him with the container and attempted to stop him, or there was no one to witness it and the "forcing" was through closed doors.

Either way.... another shitty article that doesn't really inform people of much of anything.

 

[fresch]

The U.S.A. was at the 9th grade level, we now are at a 5th grade level and falling.

 

[gun_slinger_boy]

So which is it? There is a significant difference between the two behaviors.

The first implies an open container for fast ejection of the liquid. The second implies Vogler sat still while someone slowly poured gas out.

And, if it is true he "forced his wat into the magazine's office" then it would imply people DID see him with the container and attempted to stop him, or there was no one to witness it and the "forcing" was through closed doors.

Either way.... another shitty article that doesn't really inform people of much of anything.

Sensationalism is the key. And why I hate reading the news anymore. Being that the dude survived, I'm going to guess that not all 5 gallons were used to soak him head to toe. I assume it was a quick pour of a small amount. Enough to give the attacker the time to also ignite. From behind or a blind spot, after the initial pour, someone's reaction would most likely be what the hell! Before they realize what happened, boom, they're on fire.

Just like the other thread with the "White" people being attacked by a mob, key words are put into headlines and articles to sensationalize the story and get views. "White" and "five gallons" is information not at all needed to convey the story. Notice in the article the words five gallon are in quotes as well. Does it mean the amount wasn't confirmed or that not all 5 gallons were used? A cup of gasoline isn't as exciting is it.

 

[Beerman]

The U.S.A. was at the 9th grade level, we now are at a 5th grade level and falling.

Make America Graduate Again.

 

[spat]

So which is it? There is a significant difference between the two behaviors.

The first implies an open container for fast ejection of the liquid. The second implies Vogler sat still while someone slowly poured gas out.

And, if it is true he "forced his wat into the magazine's office" then it would imply people DID see him with the container and attempted to stop him, or there was no one to witness it and the "forcing" was through closed doors.

Either way.... another shitty article that doesn't really inform people of much of anything.

A 5 gallon pail could be a container of gasoline.

It can also be dumped on someone very quickly.

Especially if you had a lid on it for transport, then loosened it before actually going into the office.

 

[spat]

Sensationalism is the key. And why I hate reading the news anymore. Being that the dude survived, I'm going to guess that not all 5 gallons were used to soak him head to toe. I assume it was a quick pour of a small amount. Enough to give the attacker the time to also ignite. From behind or a blind spot, after the initial pour, someone's reaction would most likely be what the hell! Before they realize what happened, boom, they're on fire.

Just like the other thread with the "White" people being attacked by a mob, key words are put into headlines and articles to sensationalize the story and get views. "White" and "five gallons" is information not at all needed to convey the story. Notice in the article the words five gallon are in quotes as well. Does it mean the amount wasn't confirmed or that not all 5 gallons were used? A cup of gasoline isn't as exciting is it.View attachment 270670

Wouldn't matter if he was doused with 1 gallon or 5. Much less than a gallon would soak into his clothes, the rest would form a puddle on the floor that I presume he would very quickly exit.