livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Democrats ask FBI to investigate Trump's Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh
- Thread starter livingston
- Start date
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Well I will grant the dems did a good job on this roadblock. The truth barely matters. Political courage is going to waver among the republicans on this. “How can they confirm a guy who tried to rape a girl and had her scared she would be killed?!”
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
And here we go. Jeff flake is now threatening to vote no unless he hears from this woman.
And then what? He hears from her and says she was a liar about it and he will vote to confirm?
Not looking good. Dems are dirty fkers but this was well played. And utterly impossible for anybody to have anticipated on the Brett vetting team.
And then what? He hears from her and says she was a liar about it and he will vote to confirm?
Not looking good. Dems are dirty fkers but this was well played. And utterly impossible for anybody to have anticipated on the Brett vetting team.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
BREAKING: Writer of Confidential Kavanaugh Letter Speaks Out - She's a Far-Left Activist!
BREAKING: Writer of Confidential Kavanaugh Letter Speaks Out – She’s a Far-Left Activist
BREAKING: Writer of Confidential Kavanaugh Letter Speaks Out – She’s a Far-Left Activist
byron
.308 Win
The Washington Post reports that she is a “registered Democrat who has made small contributions to political organizations.” She also signed a letter speaking out against Donald Trump’s family separation policy at the border. what more will come out she's anti Trump for sure
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
sundance says:
September 16, 2018 at 7:42 pm
Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court hit a serious roadblock Sunday night, as GOP Senate Judiciary Committee member Jeff Flake said he is uncomfortable voting to advance Kavanaugh’s nomination later this week after the nominee’s sexual assault accuser went public.
The Arizona senator said he needs to hear more about the allegations raised publicly by Christine Blasey Ford on Sunday in a Washington Post article, and said other Republicans share his view. Flake is one of 11 Republicans on the narrowly divided panel and without his support, the committee cannot advance his nomination.
Transparent Political Hit Job – Kavanaugh Accuser, Christine Ford-Blasey, Activated To Advance 35-year-old Accusations…
September 16, 2018 at 7:42 pm
Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court hit a serious roadblock Sunday night, as GOP Senate Judiciary Committee member Jeff Flake said he is uncomfortable voting to advance Kavanaugh’s nomination later this week after the nominee’s sexual assault accuser went public.
The Arizona senator said he needs to hear more about the allegations raised publicly by Christine Blasey Ford on Sunday in a Washington Post article, and said other Republicans share his view. Flake is one of 11 Republicans on the narrowly divided panel and without his support, the committee cannot advance his nomination.
Transparent Political Hit Job – Kavanaugh Accuser, Christine Ford-Blasey, Activated To Advance 35-year-old Accusations…
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
- (2) "Her husband, Russell Ford, recalled to the Post that she talked during their 2012 sessions about the incident and said she had mentioned Kavanaugh's last name and that he was a federal judge who might be on the Supreme Court eventually."
- 30 replies 175 retweets 508 likes
- Show this thread
Thomas Wictor @ThomasWictor- (3) In 2012 she said that Kavanaugh might be on the Supreme Court eventually? Not a chance. In 2012 the Democrats were riding high.
- 25 replies 329 retweets 968 likes
- Show this thread
- (4) This is another Roy Moore situation. @realDonaldTrump, I don't agree with the judge on most issue, but he is INNOCENT. I researched him and wrote multiple threads on Twitter debunking the accusations.
- 15 replies 260 retweets 776 likes
- Show this thread
- (5) THIS TIME, the accuser must be completely ignored. No discussion, no explanations. Leftists weaponized the term "sexual predator" and have used it for decades. THIS TIME it must not have an impact.
- 18 replies 342 retweets 917 likes
- Show this thread
- (6) The accusation is NOT credible. He said, she said. I choose HIM.
- 21 replies 243 retweets 910 likes
- Show this thread
- (7) As a society, we must atone for the mob action that destroyed Roy Moore. That was easily one of the worst things I've ever seen. If Republicans don't ignore these lies, then what good are Republicans? The Democrats will ALWAYS FIND AN ACCUSER.
- 27 replies 510 retweets 1,109 likes
- Show this thread
- (8) It's time to say, "We will ignore all accusers who come forward late in the day to derail a Republican." I researched Roy Moore's entire life. In over forty years of making enemies who DROVE HIM FROM THE COUNTRY, no such accusations were ever made.
- 9 replies 305 retweets 805 likes
- Show this thread
- (9) Republicans senators must be made to understand that the American people are DONE WITH THIS. The Democrats destroyed the credibility of ALL SUCH ACCUSERS. Therefore ALL ACCUSERS must be ignored, absent irrefutable primary source proof.
- 20 replies 432 retweets 927 likes
- Show this thread
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
byron
.308 Win
lets see she marched in an anti Trump rally signed letter against Trumps border polices deleated her past media post yea I beleve her 
Carlos Hathcock
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Fuck these Democrat cocksuckers. I'm so done with all of them. I used to think they were passionate and misguided about their cause but now I hate every fucking one of them. They embody what I can't stand most in the human race. As always, they don't get their way they lie, cheat, and do whatever they can till they get what they want. FUCK YOU DEMS. FUCK EVERY ONE OF YOU.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Is the accusation against Kavanaugh the culmination of a set-up from 2012? *UPDATED*
A 2012 New Yorker piece naming Kavanaugh as a potential Romney pick for the Supremes may provide the genesis for Christine Ford’s questionable accusation.
Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband. The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room. (Emphasis mine.)
Put aside for now the fact that the notes don’t jive with the accusations Ford is making. Focus, instead, on that date: 2012.
It’s a weird date. Keep in mind that Ford, aside from being a Bernie supporting academic, is a psychologist. Part of getting a degree in psychology is going through analysis. One would think that, even if, as a shy 15-year-old, Ford was too afraid to go public with her charge against Kavanaugh, when she went through psychoanalysis on her way to her degree, she would have spoken about this alleged assault, especially because she says it traumatized her for years. But she didn’t. Instead, suddenly, in 2012, she’s bathed in flop sweat from an incident decades before.
So what happened in 2012? Coincidentally (or not), 2012 was another election year.
In 2012, Romney ran against Obama. Up until his 47% gaffe, Romney was doing well. He actually had a shot of winning.
For the Democrats, as has been the case since Bork, having a Republican in the White House, especially with the ever-aging but never retiring Ruth Bader Ginsburg a perpetual risk, raised the specter of a conservative judge getting appointed to the Supreme Court. With that in mind, one Twitter user, who must have an amazing memory, remembered something interesting he’d read back in 2012:
https://t.co/hxaYqQfPI0 March 2012, the left was preparing for a possible Romney win. They assessed that Kavanaugh would be his Supreme Court pick and this accusation was ready to go. Then Obama won so the story died. Now its reemerged. Read last few lines of this 2012 article
— Stonewall Jackson (@1776Stonewall) September 16, 2018
I’ll save you a click to The New Yorker website. The article, which The New Yorker published in 2012, is a Jeffrey Toobin analysis about Bret Kavanaugh and the threat he would pose should he get on the Supreme Court. According to Toobin, Kavanaugh was a scary conservative who, if he got on the Court, might overturn Obamacare:
In other words, according to Kavanaugh, even if the Supreme Court upholds the law this spring, a President Santorum, say, could refuse to enforce aca because he “deems” the law unconstitutional. That, to put the matter plainly, is not how it works. Courts, not Presidents, “deem” laws unconstitutional, or uphold them. “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is,” Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury v. Madison, in 1803, and that observation, and that case, have served as bedrocks of American constitutional law ever since. Kavanaugh, in his decision, wasn’t interpreting the Constitution; he was pandering to the base.
In the nineteen-nineties, during Kavanaugh’s first brush with prominence, it was said that some conservatives suffered from Clinton derangement syndrome—an obsessive belief that the President and the First Lady had committed every misdeed that was attributed to them. (Hillary Clinton was involved in Vince Foster’s death; Bill Clinton had trafficked narcotics through Mena, Arkansas; and so on.) Kavanaugh’s bizarre opinion confirms that a contemporary analogue to the Clinton malady has taken hold: health-care derangement syndrome.
There’s more blah-blah from Toobin, a man who can never be trusted to be honest about the law. Don’t bother reading it. Just pay attention to that last paragraph:
If a Republican, any Republican, wins in November, his most likely first nominee to the Supreme Court will be Brett Kavanaugh. (Emphasis mine.)
In 2012, Romney might have won the election. In 2012, Toobin stoked Democrat fears that Kavanaugh, a conservative, might get on the Supreme Court and overturn Obamacare. And in 2012, Ford, a psychotherapist who undoubtedly had years of prior therapy herself, suddenly can’t stop talking about her hitherto undisclosed claim that Kavanaugh was a bad boy almost 30 years before.
So here’s the question: What do you think the odds are that, when Romney seemed within striking distance of the White House, and Kavanaugh seemed like a potential Supreme Court nominee, Ford came up with a story about Kavanaugh trying to rape her? Knowing Democrat fanaticism as we do, it’s easy to imagine that, in 2012, while Ford couldn’t go back in time to 1983 to make contemporaneous claims she could still try to lend an air of verisimilitude to her otherwise unconvincing narrative by concocting a tale for a therapist, thereby creating a “just in case” record.
More at ...
Is the accusation against Kavanaugh the culmination of a set-up from 2012? *UPDATED* - Bookworm Room
A 2012 New Yorker piece naming Kavanaugh as a potential Romney pick for the Supremes may provide the genesis for Christine Ford’s questionable accusation.
Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband. The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room. (Emphasis mine.)
Put aside for now the fact that the notes don’t jive with the accusations Ford is making. Focus, instead, on that date: 2012.
It’s a weird date. Keep in mind that Ford, aside from being a Bernie supporting academic, is a psychologist. Part of getting a degree in psychology is going through analysis. One would think that, even if, as a shy 15-year-old, Ford was too afraid to go public with her charge against Kavanaugh, when she went through psychoanalysis on her way to her degree, she would have spoken about this alleged assault, especially because she says it traumatized her for years. But she didn’t. Instead, suddenly, in 2012, she’s bathed in flop sweat from an incident decades before.
So what happened in 2012? Coincidentally (or not), 2012 was another election year.
In 2012, Romney ran against Obama. Up until his 47% gaffe, Romney was doing well. He actually had a shot of winning.
For the Democrats, as has been the case since Bork, having a Republican in the White House, especially with the ever-aging but never retiring Ruth Bader Ginsburg a perpetual risk, raised the specter of a conservative judge getting appointed to the Supreme Court. With that in mind, one Twitter user, who must have an amazing memory, remembered something interesting he’d read back in 2012:
https://t.co/hxaYqQfPI0 March 2012, the left was preparing for a possible Romney win. They assessed that Kavanaugh would be his Supreme Court pick and this accusation was ready to go. Then Obama won so the story died. Now its reemerged. Read last few lines of this 2012 article
— Stonewall Jackson (@1776Stonewall) September 16, 2018
I’ll save you a click to The New Yorker website. The article, which The New Yorker published in 2012, is a Jeffrey Toobin analysis about Bret Kavanaugh and the threat he would pose should he get on the Supreme Court. According to Toobin, Kavanaugh was a scary conservative who, if he got on the Court, might overturn Obamacare:
In other words, according to Kavanaugh, even if the Supreme Court upholds the law this spring, a President Santorum, say, could refuse to enforce aca because he “deems” the law unconstitutional. That, to put the matter plainly, is not how it works. Courts, not Presidents, “deem” laws unconstitutional, or uphold them. “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is,” Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury v. Madison, in 1803, and that observation, and that case, have served as bedrocks of American constitutional law ever since. Kavanaugh, in his decision, wasn’t interpreting the Constitution; he was pandering to the base.
In the nineteen-nineties, during Kavanaugh’s first brush with prominence, it was said that some conservatives suffered from Clinton derangement syndrome—an obsessive belief that the President and the First Lady had committed every misdeed that was attributed to them. (Hillary Clinton was involved in Vince Foster’s death; Bill Clinton had trafficked narcotics through Mena, Arkansas; and so on.) Kavanaugh’s bizarre opinion confirms that a contemporary analogue to the Clinton malady has taken hold: health-care derangement syndrome.
There’s more blah-blah from Toobin, a man who can never be trusted to be honest about the law. Don’t bother reading it. Just pay attention to that last paragraph:
If a Republican, any Republican, wins in November, his most likely first nominee to the Supreme Court will be Brett Kavanaugh. (Emphasis mine.)
In 2012, Romney might have won the election. In 2012, Toobin stoked Democrat fears that Kavanaugh, a conservative, might get on the Supreme Court and overturn Obamacare. And in 2012, Ford, a psychotherapist who undoubtedly had years of prior therapy herself, suddenly can’t stop talking about her hitherto undisclosed claim that Kavanaugh was a bad boy almost 30 years before.
So here’s the question: What do you think the odds are that, when Romney seemed within striking distance of the White House, and Kavanaugh seemed like a potential Supreme Court nominee, Ford came up with a story about Kavanaugh trying to rape her? Knowing Democrat fanaticism as we do, it’s easy to imagine that, in 2012, while Ford couldn’t go back in time to 1983 to make contemporaneous claims she could still try to lend an air of verisimilitude to her otherwise unconvincing narrative by concocting a tale for a therapist, thereby creating a “just in case” record.
More at ...
Is the accusation against Kavanaugh the culmination of a set-up from 2012? *UPDATED* - Bookworm Room
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Doc8404
.450/400 Nitro Ex
After seeing medical billing fraud many times, I suggest they check the date of the “session” along with the provider’s and Ford’s schedule.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Top Dems: We Must Delay Kavanaugh's Confirmation Process Due to an Unsubstantiated Allegation From 1982
Top Dems: We Must Delay Kavanaugh's Confirmation Process Due to an Unsubstantiated Allegation From 1982
Frank Thorp VVerified account @frankthorp 23h23 hours ago
SCHUMER: “Senator Grassley must postpone the vote until, at a very minimum, these serious and credible allegations are thoroughly investigated.”pic.twitter.com/3P8tpaCzui
Top Dems: We Must Delay Kavanaugh's Confirmation Process Due to an Unsubstantiated Allegation From 1982
Frank Thorp VVerified account @frankthorp 23h23 hours ago
SCHUMER: “Senator Grassley must postpone the vote until, at a very minimum, these serious and credible allegations are thoroughly investigated.”pic.twitter.com/3P8tpaCzui
Last edited:
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Fuck no, you had your chance at confirmation hearings.
Fuck no, these types of last minute hail Mary shit should come with consequences, not just to the accuser but all involved in putting the story out there.
These Republicans need to get some balls.
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
Bushmaster
.308 Win
See it, They said and declined saying not enough evidence fro over 30 years ago or witnesses etc....
Bushmaster
.308 Win
Few years back I painted up grave markers for Halloween in my front yard. I had her as one of my grave sites. Someplace I have better pics with pumpkins and pitch forks, and shovels near the graves. Pics are on this forum someplace LOL... Took me a few days to cut them out of plywood, vinyl them in text, then paint them. LOL Oh and Obambulate is real word for obama, look it up.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
Even higher tech lynching..