High cap mag ban passes house committee
- Thread starter Edwardteach72
- Start date
Modean
.223 Rem
Of course it did. It’ll pass the full House as well. The only question is if the Senate will vote on it or not.
Well seeing as the bill is named high
iirc they are new York
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
This country's government and its politicians have lost their fucking minds there's far more better things they can really make a difference on but fucking it's citizen's that pay their salaries and are actually trying to live a descent life . But Hell the FUCK NO they rather give away everything to people who don't deserve it ! Aren't U.S. citizens and could care less about any new or present law's and those who are citizens naturally born on U.S. soil and part of its revolving door of justice 
Yeah we should start making politicians use the correct language so their proposal and bills stay within the truth in advertising act.
Political language:
Assault weapon - everything I don’t understand or like about guns
High capacity- everything above one
Universal background checks- 100% gun registration
Normal person language
Restricted capacity- artificial magazine limit based upon unconstitutional laws passed by a government body
Standard capacity- OEM design specs
Extended capacity- aftermarket filling the gap in desired vs factory available.
Assault weapon- made up political term to get the sheep to give up of their rights
Rifle, pistol, shotgun- useful tool
Suppressor- relation enhancement device; most effectively used to settle noise complaints of those who live near shooting clubs and ranges.
Short barreled rifle/ shotgun- useful tool for confined spaces
Politician- fear monger/ power grabbing oxygen thief/ slave master wannabe
Political language:
Assault weapon - everything I don’t understand or like about guns
High capacity- everything above one
Universal background checks- 100% gun registration
Normal person language
Restricted capacity- artificial magazine limit based upon unconstitutional laws passed by a government body
Standard capacity- OEM design specs
Extended capacity- aftermarket filling the gap in desired vs factory available.
Assault weapon- made up political term to get the sheep to give up of their rights
Rifle, pistol, shotgun- useful tool
Suppressor- relation enhancement device; most effectively used to settle noise complaints of those who live near shooting clubs and ranges.
Short barreled rifle/ shotgun- useful tool for confined spaces
Politician- fear monger/ power grabbing oxygen thief/ slave master wannabe
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Thomas MassieVerified account @RepThomasMassie Sep 11
Dems passed “high capacity magazine” ban in Judiciary cmte last night. It would grandfather about 100 million high capacity magazines already in US circulation. If this bill passes the full House, it will do precisely one thing: stimulate sales of high capacity magazines
Dems passed “high capacity magazine” ban in Judiciary cmte last night. It would grandfather about 100 million high capacity magazines already in US circulation. If this bill passes the full House, it will do precisely one thing: stimulate sales of high capacity magazines
Truebeliever
6.5 Creedmoor
If it gets to the senate, and it comes up for a vote, it will have poison pills attached to it where even the democrats will vote it down
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
As per standard.
Maybe, maybe not
Mr. terzmo
.308 Win
So manufacturer's of guns will be required to meet the "standard" set throughout the Country. Besides NY and Ca., I don't think it will pass the Senate
Heres something I dont understand.
Would it not save millions of dollars, hundreds of hours of time and just be a better process for proposed laws to pass legal muster BEFORE they are signed into law?
For everything we citizens do we must first find out if said thing is legal....put an addition on your home, build a pistol, own a pet, methods of hunting, building an airplane......
Why dont politicians have to make sure their proposed laws are legal?
Passing a law....THEN running it through the court system just to either be refused by SCOTUS or sit in limbo for years seems like a huge waste and nonsensical.
Would it not save millions of dollars, hundreds of hours of time and just be a better process for proposed laws to pass legal muster BEFORE they are signed into law?
For everything we citizens do we must first find out if said thing is legal....put an addition on your home, build a pistol, own a pet, methods of hunting, building an airplane......
Why dont politicians have to make sure their proposed laws are legal?
Passing a law....THEN running it through the court system just to either be refused by SCOTUS or sit in limbo for years seems like a huge waste and nonsensical.
Why does stuff like this always have to go down when I'm broke?
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I think as a practical matter courts don't really like--and may be literally unable to as part of procedure--give an opinion on whether something is or isn't going to be legal until it's gone through a court case. Kind of like how a person may not be able to pick a law and force it through the courts until they are actually a defendant against it; until it has done them some harm.
Furthermore considering how many bills are never passed if they had to pre-vet them and get some sort of an opinion, it would likely require even more in the legal system, since they'd be vetting a lot of bills that don't have enough votes to pass anyway.
It would seem to me that such a state of affairs is indicative of having too many laws on the books in the first place.
Im saying put them through a court case.
Most bills would not need a court case because MOST are clearly legal, even if unpopular.
This would also force politicians to understand what is in a bill.
Remember Pelosi saying, "sometimes you need to pass a bill to see whats in it."?
Many bills that are passed are clearly unconstitutional and could be struck down or rewritten prior to becoming law.
Right now liberal crook judges and prosecutors will lower criminal charges just to keep the law out of the courts.
Thats about as corrupt as you can get.
Cuommo knows the SafeAct is unconstitutional and his biggest fear is that it gets to SCOTUS.
An illegal law can spend years in court and cost millions of taxpayer dollars.
Im just throwing things out.
Maybe just have a fast track way to bring questionable laws to court sooner and give SCOTUS less power over what they accept.
If you are arrested for a constitutionally questionable crime, expect to pay 10s of thousands of dollars in lower courts to bring it to SCOTUS.
So, if any of us here are arrested for a SafeAct violation, we have to just take the punishment, including loss of 2A rights for life.
There has to be a better way.
Wide scale lack of compliance. It killed prohibition.
Its not enough to just not comply.
You need to flaunt it.
Get 10,000 NYers to carry their non-compliant MSRs in the open.
I'm not an NYer anymore but get that many involved I'll come along.
Target
6.5 Creedmoor
Does PSA still have PMAgs for $7.99 with free shipping if you buy 10?
Also, they are delusional if they think 100 million mags is the true count.
Also, they are delusional if they think 100 million mags is the true count.
Hell many places run that deal. Or the 1,000 rounds of 5.56 and 10 mags for $xxx.xx
PWS was running a killer deal on Lancer blem AR15 mags, $110 forna 10 pack. Long gone by now. Whish I had had the money at the time.
repete
.338 Win Mag
This statement is what is wrong with conservatives and some Republicans, just because you use common sense doesn't mean liberal Democrat's and Rinos have any let alone use it!
Twogunwilly
6.5 Creedmoor
They got to make up their minds, Impeach President Trump & cause a revolution -or- ban the most popular rifle in America and start a revolution.
I anxiously await their decision.
I anxiously await their decision.
Justincase
.308 Win
I say good. Let it pass. I've said it before. More good deals on guns, and let the other states feel our pain and see how apathetic they are compared to the Northeast. Maybe they can get something done.
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Still people who think they can run away to a “free state”. No matter, federal democrats are right behind them with national legislation.
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
How would you try a case in court over a law that hadn't been enacted yet?
You wouldn't have anyone with standing to bring the case in the first place.
You wouldn't have anyone with standing to bring the case in the first place.