Idaho AG Defends 2nd Amendment Against New York Lawsuits
- Thread starter gunpoliticsny
- Start date
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Judge should declare the lawsuit frivolous, fine Buffalo and Rochester for court cost and Idahos' state legal fees.
Robin
Robin
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
Idaho will win this fight. NY people should sue NY demOrats for letting criminals run free to keep continuing to commit crimes.
We don`t have a gun problem in this country, we have a tyrannical politician problem in our country that have their heads up their asses.
We don`t have a gun problem in this country, we have a tyrannical politician problem in our country that have their heads up their asses.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
I’m waiting for them to sue the makers of hands, hammers, knives, cars, booze, weed, and many other things for failing to do what they are claiming gun makers do.
Buffalo and Rochester’s lawsuits claim gun manufacturers violated New York’s “reasonable controls” statute by not doing enough to prevent criminal misuse of their products after lawful sale. The cities seek both monetary damages and court-imposed supervision of manufacturing and distribution practices. The amicus brief argues these claims are precisely what PLCAA prohibits and would unconstitutionally burden Second Amendment rights.
Buffalo and Rochester’s lawsuits claim gun manufacturers violated New York’s “reasonable controls” statute by not doing enough to prevent criminal misuse of their products after lawful sale. The cities seek both monetary damages and court-imposed supervision of manufacturing and distribution practices. The amicus brief argues these claims are precisely what PLCAA prohibits and would unconstitutionally burden Second Amendment rights.
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
Got a actual link to that decision? I`m not finding it.
thughes
.223 Rem
Too bad "Smith & Wesson, Glock, Ruger, and Taurus" couldn't somehow stop shipping of all their products to NY. (and no LEO exemption to this!)
All 50 States on Notice Supreme Court's 9-0 Ruling Reshapes U.S. Gun Law
I do not see this posted anywhere but maybe I missed it ...
nygunforum.com
It was a copyright case, but does extend the protections under trhe lawful commerce in firearms act.
Lowly shit filled courts of dei libs, seem to ignore Scotus rulings nowadays.........
I agree but Stockholders don't give a shit!
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
And THAT, is the whole problem. Companies sold out to these overpaid fucks. Kinda got what we deserved i reckon.
spat
.950 JDJ
Some free state AGs should start suing NY municipalities for creating a public nuisance using the same legal rationale NY uses to sue makers of NY unfriendly accessories.
NY municipalities create a public nuisance when they undercharge or early release known dangerous criminals who then travel to free states and commit more crimes.
All 12 Blue states are passing Safe Acts, and the right to sue gun companies, despite SCOTUS rulings and Fed law.
They are unreconstructed, Iranian Jihadi, anti American communists, trying to tie the gun industry up in dozens of lawsuits.
They are unreconstructed, Iranian Jihadi, anti American communists, trying to tie the gun industry up in dozens of lawsuits.
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
Install a wall around all 12 blue states, list them as terrorist countries, then the president can send them a hot booming message!
That`ll fix the problem....permanently!
Last edited:
spat
.950 JDJ
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
Well I certianly agree with you there. If we ever get an AG to do their dam job we might get somewhere. AG's should be handing out indictments every dam hour for the Bullshit going on across the Country.
I think the problem goes deeper that that,- I blame that RINO Chief Justice Roberts @ SCOTUS. He rules against our rights too often, AND, he is restricting the number of cases that go before SCOTUS every year (to about 80 IIRC), which is half of what they used to handle. As a result, many 2A cases that should be heard at SCOTUS are never granted Cert,- and our rights are delayed and infringed as a result.
Last edited:
It's really easy...
18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law. According to the 2nd Amendment, government is prohibited from making 'gun laws.' Doing so is a crime.
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
But we STILL, let them get away with it. We just keep moving backwards for them as they keep their boots are on our throats.
I believe we are going back to SCOTUS but they are waiting for the right case.
When it comes to guns, Justices Rule according to their beliefs in a Political Party's Platform over the Constitution and exactly what it says.
The hidden and deeper issue that appears unlikely but very much may be a reality is a coming need for Citizens to be well armed in the true Spirit of the Second Amendment: We have muzzies that want to murder all non-believers, Terrorists from multiple Countries who have sent their fighting age males here to live among us (World wide they know our Army unmatched, but house to house where they've lived the last few years would leave them a huge advantage and defensible against our Military that's not allowed use against Americans)
Last edited:
One would think the police are there to stop the political breaking of the law. Unfortunately many of the police I have had to deal with are on personal power trips and don't actually know the laws, nor capable of reading written court orders and understanding what the words mean.