Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
Kid Rock shoots up Bud Light cans with rifle to protest Dylan Mulvaney partnership: 'F--- Bud Light'
- Thread starter Jem45472
- Start date
Beerman
6.5 Creedmoor
Reminder: Life’s too short to drink bad beer.
Men fucking rule !!! …. Wait
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Easy for me since I don't drink.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
BTW, I would appreciate if you refer to me by my pronoun instead of "guys."
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
im hearing they have lost 5 billion so far ..
"Since March 31, shares of Bud Light’s parent company have fallen by nearly 4% — knocking down the company’s market capitalization from $132.38 billion to $127.13 billion on Wednesday.
Anheuser-Busch stock fizzled more than 1.5% on Wednesday."
nypost.com
"Since March 31, shares of Bud Light’s parent company have fallen by nearly 4% — knocking down the company’s market capitalization from $132.38 billion to $127.13 billion on Wednesday.
Anheuser-Busch stock fizzled more than 1.5% on Wednesday."
Anheuser-Busch loses more than $5 billion in value amid Dylan Mulvaney Bud Light controversy
Anheuser-Busch stock was down more than 1.5% on Wednesday.
nypost.com
Must be a drunk in charge! .im hearing they have lost 5 billion so far ..
View attachment 197267
"Since March 31, shares of Bud Light’s parent company have fallen by nearly 4% — knocking down the company’s market capitalization from $132.38 billion to $127.13 billion on Wednesday.
Anheuser-Busch stock fizzled more than 1.5% on Wednesday."
Anheuser-Busch loses more than $5 billion in value amid Dylan Mulvaney Bud Light controversy
Anheuser-Busch stock was down more than 1.5% on Wednesday.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
speerchucker
.40 S&W
My son sent this to me this afternoon funny as
What the Bud Light Fiasco Reveals about the Ruling Class ⋆ Brownstone Institute
"That the markets have so brutally punished the brand and company for this profound error points the way to the future. People should have the right to their own choices about the kind of life they want to live and the products and services they want to consume. The dystopia of lockdowns and woke hegemony of public opinion – complete with censorship – have become the policy to overturn if the workers are ever to throw off the chains that bind them.
The boycotts of Bud Light are but a beginning."
"That the markets have so brutally punished the brand and company for this profound error points the way to the future. People should have the right to their own choices about the kind of life they want to live and the products and services they want to consume. The dystopia of lockdowns and woke hegemony of public opinion – complete with censorship – have become the policy to overturn if the workers are ever to throw off the chains that bind them.
The boycotts of Bud Light are but a beginning."
Maybe I’m missing something here, but are we really comparing trans and gay people to nazis? That seems a tad dramatic.
Bud Light can and is spending their marketing dollars how they want, that’s their choice, just like you have a choice in what beers you purchase. All this controversy does is give them free PR.
spat
.950 JDJ
Not all trans people, just the militant zealots.
And yes, they are *far more* dangerous than the modern neo-nazis, primarily because many people take them seriously.
Nobody is claiming they don't have a *right* to do this. But everyone pretty much universally acknowledges that it was a very bad idea.
It's not exactly "free PR", so far it's cost them about $6B in market cap and 50% of their sales...
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
I’ll respectfully disagree with you as far as trans people being “more dangerous than the modern neo-nazis”, I was raised that a nazi is a nazi & I just don’t see how anybody who wants to be the opposite gender is harmful, but I’m a live and let live kind of guy i guess
sure does look like bud lite is taking a hit though, oh well!
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
so your ok with a man sharing the bathroom / shower room ...
with your female wife or female daughter at the school locker room ..
if you have either ..
I understand where you’re coming from, and I think we’d both agree that we both just want what is safest for all of us, and our families.
I just don’t think this trans issue is the bogeyman the media is making it out to be.
here’s the honest truth, if there’s a sick pervert (of any biological sex, gender, whatever), bent on committing some sort of peeping or sexual crime, they’re going to do it regardless of what it says on that bathroom door. after all, at the end of the day it’s just a sign, there has never been somebody standing at the entrance to every bathroom policing it and to suggest that we do that would be ludicrous.
I find even the implication that people have decided to live their whole life as another gender just to gain access to a women’s bathroom is frankly ridiculous, and so does my wife for that matter. there’s a trans woman at her work and she has no issue using the same restroom. her quote: “we have stalls, what do I care?”
finally, who is to say that sex criminals can only commit crimes in a bathroom, locker room or shower anyways? the sad truth is that the majority of these crimes happen elsewhere.
if we take the logic of “rigid and enforced separation of biological sex = no sex crimes” to the extremes, we’d have to separate women and girls away from society completely like the muslim extremist countries…
I just think the vast majority of trans people are in earnest, just trying to live their lives and not some perverts trying to grift people.
I’ll finish this way too long post by saying that any creep, pervert or sicko of any gender that is caught peeping or sexually assaulting any one, anywhere, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. no excuses.
spat
.950 JDJ
Someone who just wants to live their life differently is not objectionable. Dress how you want, we don't care.
The "bake me a cake or else" crowd OTOH are very dangerous.
The "use my pronouns or I'll get you fired" crowd are repugnant.
The people who think anyone who doesn't accept their personal kink deserves a *violent* response are a menace to society.
The man who wants to play a contact sport in the girls league *is very dangerous* to the girls in that league.
You know what the next step past the transgenders is ? It's the furrys. Nobody cares if an adult wants to put on a cat costume and attend an orgy, but imagine if they started insisting they *were* cats and dogs, and suddenly they had the backing of the government and media in that delusion. If they insisted you were a bigot if you objected to them using a litter box in their cube at work.
Imagine if the flat earthers got that level of power and demanded acceptance, if engineers or navigators had to pretend to accept "their truth" or risk their jobs. It's that dangerous.
You may have personal reasons to have strong sympathy with the transgenders, and the vast majority of them are harmless, but the movement itself has become militant and quite dangerous.
The neo-nazis ? They're a joke, no matter how repugnant their beliefs, they simply aren't powerful enough to be worthy of fear. Nobody takes them seriously, there's barely a handful of them in existence, and probably half of *them* are on the FBI payroll.
The militant wing of the transgender movement is demanding *medical science* be rewritten to conform to their delusion. You can take whatever social role you want, but that doesn't mean Burt now has a period just because he started calling himself Beth, and demanding eveeyone else to take that seriously, let alone doctors is fundamentally dangerous.
Last edited:
Arjuna
.338 Win Mag
fwiw, I’m totally with you on how dangerous the furries are ( although thankfully, I don’t see any of that happening soon, those freaks are really TOO out there, even for most libs).
I also agree with you that professional sports should remain separated by biological gender, except for perhaps some very special case.
I agree about the flat earthers as well.
I appreciate your thought our response and the discussion, I wasn’t trying to “stir the pot” so to speak, but I don’t think all trans people should automatically be considered dangerous. every group has its extremists, and we’re no better than the libs if we judge an entire social group based on that.
Uninformed and Compliant
.450/400 Nitro Ex
They aren't. Only the narcissists are, who happen to be the loudest and most visible, and happen to be running the show.
We don't get to ignore the fact that any criticism of those TQPRSWEXNZ+ subversive, degenerate narcissists is automatically treated as being about LGB. Wearing a rubber dog mask and having a shit-sniffing fetish is not an LGB issue, and a person who considers a shit-sniffing fetish to be disgusting does not mean they are anti-LGB.
Likewise, a straight guy in a dress who has a used tampon fetish, and uses the dress for access to the trash can in the women's room, does not get to claim LGB discrimination.
At all.
And yet, that's the narrative - anything against those specific degenerate subversives is automatically treated as if LGB was even relevant.
Cheers,
