No, Hillary lost because she was the most detestable person ever to run for office.Hillary lost the election because of the Comey investigation.
Sounds like a crazy and paranoid conspiracy theory. Perfect for Trump.Nice Times Magazine "Knock Knock" issue in the box...Eh?
View attachment 171716
Kash Patel on FBI Trump RAID photo release: "It is STAGED!"
"It is STAGED. These are NOT classified documents. They are trying this case in the court of public opinion because they don't want Trump to run in 2024. This raid is continuing to BACKFIRE."
You seem to forget the fact that since he is no longer president the documents don't belong to him.No, Hillary lost because she was the most detestable person ever to run for office.
She was *proven* to have done far worse things with classified information. Did they raid her home ? No, they decided to not prosecute because they think she didn't mean any harm LOL.
If the left didn't have double standards they wouldn't have any standards at all.
How much would you be howling for blood if Trump had a secret email server in his bathroom at mar-a-lago for the express purpose of keeping communications "off book".
I would like to point out that an email server can get hacked, and probably was.
A box of documents in a safe guarded by the secret service cannot.
Sounds like a crazy and paranoid conspiracy theory. Perfect for Trump.
Yeah personal attacks are a really great way to look smart.Stay ignorant. Works well for some people.
It’s crazy how people think copy’s are official documents. All official documents are now digital, digitally signed and digitally stored. Any document printed on paper is a copy. Unless it’s something like the big laws signed in the super sized folder for show and kept for the presidential museum.It's crazy how many people believe that Trump gets to keep all of his presidential documents like they belong to him.
They belong to the people not to him.
What did she intend to do ? What possible legitimate reason would she have for conducting government business on an email server that wasn't subject to government control ?You seem to forget the fact that since he is no longer president the documents don't belong to him.
And why did he say they were declassified if they clearly were not?
What did he intend to do with the documents? Blackmail? Extortion? Sell to our enemies?
Why would you think they weren't declassified?You seem to forget the fact that since he is no longer president the documents don't belong to him.
And why did he say they were declassified if they clearly were not?
What did he intend to do with the documents? Blackmail? Extortion? Sell to our enemies?
You seem to forget the fact that since he is no longer president the documents don't belong to him.
And why did he say they were declassified if they clearly were not?
What did he intend to do with the documents? Blackmail? Extortion? Sell to our enemies?
This is correct the original documents can very well be declassified which start with the official digital source working copy.Why would you think they weren't declassified?
What possible reason would he have had for *not* declassifying them ?
While it's true he no longer had that power once he left office, the documents were in his possession before he left.
"My term is ending, but I want to keep these documents as insurance in case they accuse me of impropriety. I won't be able to retain them if they're classified. Good thing I can fix that easily LOL".
Say it isn't so.BOMBSHELL REPORT: Lawsuit Documents Reveal OVER 50 BIDEN ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEES, 12 US Agencies Involved in Social Media CENSORSHIP Push...
You know what's more dangerous? Ignoring the constitution and committing acts of treason.
Poor thing.Yeah personal attacks are a really great way to look smart.
If the government is afraid of the people, good. That's the way it's supposed to be.You know what's more dangerous? Ignoring the constitution and committing acts of treason.
It shows what degree of intelligence he thinks his followers have. Anybody with a clue knew immediately the FBI had put those docs there and the FBI never pretended otherwise.The point of the photograph was to show how many of the classified documents existed and how they never had their classified markings removed. It's a very pathetic red herring by the Trump team.
Yes, you've got the gist indeed of his defense.Why would you think they weren't declassified?
What possible reason would he have had for *not* declassifying them ?
While it's true he no longer had that power once he left office, the documents were in his possession before he left.
"My term is ending, but I want to keep these documents as insurance in case they accuse me of impropriety. I won't be able to retain them if they're classified. Good thing I can fix that easily LOL".
While Trump has insisted he declassified the documents in his possession prior to removing them from the White House, Napolitano insisted that point was irrelevant. Under the law, it doesn't matter if documents containing national defense information, or NDI, are classified or not, he wrote, saying it is always criminal to have NDI in a non-federal facility—something Trump essentially admitted to in an appearance on Real America's Voice on Thursday morning—to have individuals without security clearances move that information from one place to another, and to keep it from federal authorities while they are seeking it.
This!
Mike Davis- This a charade- it’s because Trump has the “crossfire hurricane” records declassified and he took a personal copy it’s terrifying to Obama Biden Hillary James Clapper Susan Rice FBI Intel community deep state- they know Crossfire Hurricane records are damming - that’s what this raid was all about.
The precedent was set, if you don't mean any harm they won't prosecute.Yes, you've got the gist indeed of his defense.
But, it's irrelevant.
![]()
Trump Could Be Indicted for Three Crimes, Conservative Former Judge Says
Andrew Napolitano, a conservative media personality and former New Jersey Superior Court judge, said he believed Trump could face federal indictment.www.newsweek.com
This is not the clinton case, though in light of trump's criminal investigation I bet you won't hear many "lock her up" from him again.The precedent was set, if you don't mean any harm they won't prosecute.
Or does that only apply to democrats?
Her crimes were far more egregious.This is not the clinton case, though in light of trump's criminal investigation I bet you won't hear many "lock her up" from him again.
That's weird mine too.is anybody getting these posts ?
Mine is showing #KAREN