More Than 30,000 Cars Participated in Anti-Communist, Latinos For Trump Caravan in South Florida

[livingston]

Miami PD Estimates More Than 30,000 Cars Participated in Anti-Communist, Latinos For Trump Caravan in South Florida
Latinos in South Florida love President Trump.

Latinos from Nicaragua, Venezuela and Cuba living in South Florida know the dangers of Socialism and Communism which is why they reject Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

translation:

according to @MiamiPD over 30,000 cars participated in today’s #AntiCommunist Caravan #KAG https://t.co/TEKV3HXz4P

— Rey Anthony (@ReyAnthonyFL) October 10, 2020

Miami PD Estimates More Than 30,000 Cars Participated in Anti-Communist, Latinos For Trump Caravan in South Florida (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Latinos in South Florida love President Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[livingston]

Biden can hardly put together a 10 car rally folks

 

[Acer-m14]

Candance Owens had some vids on her BLEXIT .. from Flordia i do believe ..

brb ..

nope was in DC ....

Today is a big day for BLEXIT!! 2,029 blacks and Latinos have descended in Washington D.C to protest against the anti-American, Marxist, Black Lives Matter narrative.

 

[holdover]

Communist control act of 1954

 

[repete]

Communist control act of 1954

View attachment 91163

So what happened to it? We really need another Eisenhower!

 

[SonOfSun]

So what happened to it? We really need another Eisenhower!

It was ruled unconstitutional, as it should have been. Eisenhower was a thought control Nazi.

 

[GOPerfect]

 

[Cooolone]

That, that... That's impossible! Trump is losing by double digits, haven't you read the NEWS!

Lol

 

[holdover]

It was ruled unconstitutional, as it should have been. Eisenhower was a thought control Nazi.

Your calling Eisenhower a NAZI? , I think the guy spent a great deal of his career killing them by the millions

The act declared that, “The Communist Party of the United States, though purportedly a political party, is in fact an instrumentality of a conspiracy to overthrow the Government of the United States.” The act went on to charge that the party’s “role as the agency of a hostile foreign power renders its existence a clear and continuing danger to the security of the United States.” The conclusion seemed inescapable: “The Communist Party should be outlawed.”


The Act has since been ruled unconstitutional in federal court but has not been ruled on in the Supreme Court

It was not until 1973 that a federal court in Arizona declared the act unconstitutional, and the U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled on it; technically, the Communist Party USA is still an illegal organization.

 

[SonOfSun]

Your calling Eisenhower a NAZI? , I think the guy spent a great deal of his career killing them by the millions

The act declared that, “The Communist Party of the United States, though purportedly a political party, is in fact an instrumentality of a conspiracy to overthrow the Government of the United States.” The act went on to charge that the party’s “role as the agency of a hostile foreign power renders its existence a clear and continuing danger to the security of the United States.” The conclusion seemed inescapable: “The Communist Party should be outlawed.”


The Act has since been ruled unconstitutional in federal court but has not been ruled on in the Supreme Court

It was not until 1973 that a federal court in Arizona declared the act unconstitutional, and the U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled on it; technically, the Communist Party USA is still an illegal organization.

Not a literal German type Nazi, a "thought control Nazi", IE. someone who thinks they can tell you what you are or aren't allowed to believe.

The CCA was declared unconstitutional by the highest court that it has reached. It wasn't appealed, and for good reason because it's a losing fight.

 

[holdover]

The 2nd Amendment ensures the right to self defense in cases of imminent threat. International law allows the means of self defense when attacked. But when Communists in the US cry for the overthrow of the US government by force, and receive aid and training from foreign nations to do it. We are supposed to close our eyes to the threat because it violates the 1st amendment? Are we expected to fight a war through the supreme court? This is nonsense, Eisenhower was correct. the preservation of the country is paramount over any existing law by the reason that those laws will no longer exist if the country falls. Allowing communists to overthrow our own country is patriotic because it honors the first A .??

Wheres your first amendment if the communists win?

 

[holdover]

Not a literal German type Nazi, a "thought control Nazi", IE. someone who thinks they can tell you what you are or aren't allowed to believe.

Theres an old saying in the military, "We protect democracy we don't practice it." An effective military leader cannot worry about what his troops thinks, a job has to be done and nobody gives a flying fuck about what you think , Your paid to follow orders , people are depending on you to do it . Its called being a professional .

As far as believing is concerned , there no problem with that. The problem ,as identified is in organizations , not individuals.

 

[Defilade]

 

[spat]

Not a literal German type Nazi, a "thought control Nazi", IE. someone who thinks they can tell you what you are or aren't allowed to believe.

The CCA was declared unconstitutional by the highest court that it has reached. It wasn't appealed, and for good reason because it's a losing fight.

These days they would be declared a terrorist organization. There are plenty of terrorist organizations that are outlawed in the US today.

Try sending $100 to ISIS, you'll end up in prison and no court is going to intervene.

Their solution to the problem was (as usual) to abducate their legislative obligation to an unelected bureaucrat in the deep state.

"well, we can't outlaw the communist party, but we can outlaw 'terrorist organizations' and then let a bureaucrat designate them as one."