livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
At today's House Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) debated semi-automatic weapon ownership with Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX).
Oct 27, 2021
Oct 27, 2021
Nadler Asks Chip Roy (R-TX). : 'What Do You Use Semi-Automatic Weapons For?'
- Thread starter livingston
- Start date
Carlos Hathcock
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I'm sure Jerry shit his pants (again) upon hearing the answer.
Deplorable Me
.700 Nitro Express
Ya know what you can tell Nadler?
Not much.
I doubt anything will sink in.
Not much.
I doubt anything will sink in.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
He asks if an AR-15 style gun would be used to fire on US military .. The best answer would have been Have agents of our government ever fired upon US citizens... (ruby ridge )... I am sure he would feign ignorance.
4WHLDRFTN
.308 Win
this is what it looks like without a spine ...chest of drawers
God bless Texas.
We need a shit ton more pissed off Texans.
We need a shit ton more pissed off Texans.
Ask the branch dividians what they think. Oh wait. You can't. They're all dead. The government killed them.
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
Gun control certainly does have it's roots in racism.
This was a great exchange. It was not rude, it was professional. I wish all debates could occur this way.
A lot like this forum, many times we disagree with one another and we discuss things. Washington should be more like this all of the time.
I yield back my time.
A lot like this forum, many times we disagree with one another and we discuss things. Washington should be more like this all of the time.
I yield back my time.
Nadler is such an ignorant and pathetic POS I can't believe he is returned to congress every two years. He represents everything that is wrong with the democrats and the ruling class.
Part of me truly hopes that antifa mobs come for him and his family and his last thoughts are wishing he had the ability to defend himself.
I posted an article earlier today in the "I'm just going to leave it here" thread. I didn't really buy into everything the author was saying but I am now. The key paragraphs are:
Keep adjusting your world view until you no longer are surprised. If you are surprised by this, try adjusting your paradigm to something like, "This has nothing to do with health. The Beast is using information war to destroy our military. And more. Defund the Police. Is a hostile takeover. Opening the borders is a hostile takeover. Breaking the economy is a hostile takeover. The Beast is setting conditions for authentic genocide."
If you try my current paradigm for just a week, you be unsurprised at ships off the coast unable to unload, forced jabs with untested chemicals into children's arms. Or, maybe the chemicals actually were heavily tested, say, on Uighurs. Don't laugh. Don't scoff. This readily fits a paradigm that is not another wild conspiracy.
Keep adjusting your world view until you are no longer surprised. Truer words were never spoken.
Part of me truly hopes that antifa mobs come for him and his family and his last thoughts are wishing he had the ability to defend himself.
I posted an article earlier today in the "I'm just going to leave it here" thread. I didn't really buy into everything the author was saying but I am now. The key paragraphs are:
Keep adjusting your world view until you no longer are surprised. If you are surprised by this, try adjusting your paradigm to something like, "This has nothing to do with health. The Beast is using information war to destroy our military. And more. Defund the Police. Is a hostile takeover. Opening the borders is a hostile takeover. Breaking the economy is a hostile takeover. The Beast is setting conditions for authentic genocide."
If you try my current paradigm for just a week, you be unsurprised at ships off the coast unable to unload, forced jabs with untested chemicals into children's arms. Or, maybe the chemicals actually were heavily tested, say, on Uighurs. Don't laugh. Don't scoff. This readily fits a paradigm that is not another wild conspiracy.
Keep adjusting your world view until you are no longer surprised. Truer words were never spoken.
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Hit him right in the mouth.
The case of black citizens being oppressed by denial of means to defend themselves is a very clear way to justify the very nature of the 2nd amendment.
And even if they would not agree they are not going to say anything that might shake a PC alarm.
...bunch of pussies.
The case of black citizens being oppressed by denial of means to defend themselves is a very clear way to justify the very nature of the 2nd amendment.
And even if they would not agree they are not going to say anything that might shake a PC alarm.
...bunch of pussies.
History is full of evidence dating all the way back to the founding of the colonies on this continent of governments using their armed forces against their citizens/ subjects/ native population. For no other reason than to deny them the right to live in peace, practice a religion, raise a family or speak their mind. Today the government is using financial extortion as a means to force people to get a medical treatment they neither desire or trust. Is it a far reach to say the government will use physical force if the current method fails to produce the desired outcome? I dare say no. So yes, I may one day have to use the weapons I own to defend my family and our natural rights.
Last edited:
That was a telling statement by that fat POS. He seems to expect troops to be used in the near term. Curious line of thought.
Uzi
.308 Win
The constant attack on the 2A with the never ending redundant "debates" are pure evidence the anti gun tyrants have had more than just one foot in the door since day one. Clearly the sign reading shall not trespass has been ignored for many decades, but why is trespassing not enforced and completely being ignored on all levels of law? Can anyone guess what else needs ignoring in full force?
They only needed the one foot in the door, which is the debating a constitutional right to protect one's freedom of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. This is not debatable because it's universally agreed with all mentally stable humans, that nobody wants to be murdered wrongfully and or open to be controlled under tyranny. Again, it's not up for fucking debate. The back and forth debates are not helping, no matter how good it feels. The debate shouldn't exist, but now the tyrants are being given more oportunities to actually enact more illegal gun laws because it's being debated. More miles taken from an inch. Fuck all of these motherfuckers. Shall not be infringed is still pretty fucking clear to some people out there at least, Just not enough unfortunately.
It's not shall not be infringed EXCEPT full autos, semi autos, pistol grips, " banana clips", high capacity magazines, and "thingies that go up".
They only needed the one foot in the door, which is the debating a constitutional right to protect one's freedom of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. This is not debatable because it's universally agreed with all mentally stable humans, that nobody wants to be murdered wrongfully and or open to be controlled under tyranny. Again, it's not up for fucking debate. The back and forth debates are not helping, no matter how good it feels. The debate shouldn't exist, but now the tyrants are being given more oportunities to actually enact more illegal gun laws because it's being debated. More miles taken from an inch. Fuck all of these motherfuckers. Shall not be infringed is still pretty fucking clear to some people out there at least, Just not enough unfortunately.
It's not shall not be infringed EXCEPT full autos, semi autos, pistol grips, " banana clips", high capacity magazines, and "thingies that go up".
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
BINGO!
That is exactly what I was thinking.
"Sir, if American troops are being illegally ordered to act unconstitutionally and infringe on the rights of American citizens without due process, then we would be presented with exactly the kind of tyranny against which the founders enshrined firearms ownership in the second amendment. I yield back my time."
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
there should be no time limit .. we pay them to listen .. in any office .. govt .. school boards .. ect .. my thinking a time limit on speaking is a violation of the 1A ..
spat
.950 JDJ
There are only so many hours in the day. It must be rationed somehow.
You know what I'd like to Nadler?
I'd like to put him on a treadmill with a machine like this behind:
youtube.com
Then I'd tell that decrepit old invalid to run or die.
I wanna get all Jigsaw with democrats.
I'd like to put him on a treadmill with a machine like this behind:
Satisfying Crusher machine #shorts
BEST DEALS RECOMMENDATION==Wall Art===Rustic Wall Home Decor Living Room Lights :https://amzn.to/3zpyDEhInspirational Wall Art for Office : https://amzn.to/3...
youtube.com
I wanna get all Jigsaw with democrats.