police officers were refused service by several employees at the Five Guys restaurant

[holdover]

Daphne Police release statement on incident at Five Guys

DAPHNE, Ala. (WALA) -- A law enforcement source confirmed to FOX10 News that Daphne police officers were refused service by several employees at the Five Guys restaurant at Jubilee Square

www.fox10tv.com

DAPHNE, Ala. (WALA) -- A law enforcement source confirmed to FOX10 News that Daphne police officers were refused service by several employees at the Five Guys restaurant at Jubilee Square shopping center late Tuesday night.

The officers said the employees turned their backs on them when they entered the restaurant.

One of the employees was overheard saying, “I’m not serving them.” The officers left and went to another restaurant.


Dont cry like a baby when the police turn thier backs on you. and Fuck them .


(Saying fuck 5 guys doesn't come out right.)

It baffles me that they cant see that the police are going to return the favor.

 

[DrBleachCocktail]

They do have a right to not serve but don’t be surprised when that place burns down and no one cares. When doing business keep politics and personal emotions aside.

 

[Jezman]

Five guys is over priced and not that good soooooo bye bye.

 

[Calculon]

The right not to serve belongs with the franchise owner, not the pukes at the register. I'd fire each of them and start over.

 

[DrBleachCocktail]

The right not to serve belongs with the franchise owner, not the pukes at the register. I'd fire each of them and start over.

Whoops I stand corrected, I love how people treat the cops like shit, but when in time of need their attitudes change. Something seems wrong.

 

[Defilade]

Cops better bring their own lunch, who knows what they are doing to the food.

 

[Mr. terzmo]

Any of the LEO's black?

 

[kev74]

Cops better bring their own lunch, who knows what they are doing to the food.

 

[Carlos Hathcock]

I have plenty of room on my list of people, places, and things I wrote off.

 

[Cooolone]

Employees don't have First Amendment Rights while engaged in the employ of the owner. They should be terminated, without a word. Let them figure it out...

What next? Refuse service to Whites? Or heaven forbid, Blacks? How about a Preacher!?

Fuck this noise... Assholes are gonna learn nobody gives a fuck what they think, just flip the fucking burger and do your job. Otherwise take a hike!

 

[Dr. Evil]

Sounds like some or all of the 5 Guys are idiots. I hope that karma bites them in the ass.

 

[Airborneguy]

Any cop who orders out while in uniform (unless they know the place well), is a fool. What we faced in the ghetto has now spread nationwide. They're lucky they were refused service rather than served cum-filled burgers.

 

[SomeSoldier]

Employees don't have First Amendment Rights while engaged in the employ of the owner. They should be terminated, without a word. Let them figure it out...

What next? Refuse service to Whites? Or heaven forbid, Blacks? How about a Preacher!?

Fuck this noise... Assholes are gonna learn nobody gives a fuck what they think, just flip the fucking burger and do your job. Otherwise take a hike!

No the employee retain their rights but the owner has the right to terminate them if he doesn't like their behavior. The only employer that can void your rights is the federal gov while you have a contract with them.

 

[Cooolone]

No the employee retain their rights but the owner has the right to terminate them if he doesn't like their behavior. The only employer that can void your rights is the federal gov while you have a contract with them.

Actually, you're not quite correct! Even protected activity such as "Organizing" (Right to Organize) workers, is not a "Protected Activity" while engaged in employer activity, you can do what you want while on break, say for lunch, but still, not on the employers property even.

You have no right to express your opinion on any subject matter unrelated to your employment, while being paid by your employer. Let alone in a setting where you interact with the public. Otherwise, you'd have to show me some precedent to the contrary ... You are reserved to perform the task or operation required by your employer for the compensation agreed upon. That's it... You don't get to "embellish or express opinion, or promote" any political, race identity, gender agenda, or religion, etc.

Here's a hypothetical for ya'...

Could you imagine calling a technical support line for a product you own, and the operator answers saying "Black Lives Matter", Welcome to (name company) Technical Support, how may I assist you?...

Yeah right!

 

[carpediem]

Employees don't have First Amendment Rights while engaged in the employ of the owner

Tell that to this guy and his friends.

 

[SomeSoldier]

Actually, you're not quite correct! Even protected activity such as "Organizing" (Right to Organize) workers, is not a "Protected Activity" while engaged in employer activity, you can do what you want while on break, say for lunch, but still, not on the employers property even.

You have no right to express your opinion on any subject matter unrelated to your employment, while being paid by your employer. Let alone in a setting where you interact with the public. Otherwise, you'd have to show me some precedent to the contrary ... You are reserved to perform the task or operation required by your employer for the compensation agreed upon. That's it... You don't get to "embellish or express opinion, or promote" any political, race identity, gender agenda, or religion, etc.

Here's a hypothetical for ya'...

Could you imagine calling a technical support line for a product you own, and the operator answers saying "Black Lives Matter", Welcome to (name company) Technical Support, how may I assist you?...

Yeah right!

I was in the Army, I lost my right to say what was on my mind.

 

[ArmedCorgi]

If I were the owner of that 5 guys, those employees would be let go.

Also, what a lot of people don't realize, is that the police are under no obligation to help you.
Police Have No Duty to Protect You, Federal Court Affirms Yet Again | Ryan McMaken

Warren v. District of Columbia - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So treating them like shit, when they have done nothing to hurt you personally is dumb. You can fight injustice in ways that don't penalize individuals who haven't personally hurt you and are just trying to serve the community.

 

[togmaster]

I like their fries...

 

[Depick]

My personal opinion and feelings never come into play when Business is involved. People get way too emotional with certain subjects so I always keep my interactions with customers professional.

 

[Darth]

Cops were probably being d-bags doing things to "make a statement." Well, they got their statement heard.





(Let's see if this works both ways like when the guys film cops. )

 

[Darth]

The right not to serve belongs with the franchise owner, not the pukes at the register. I'd fire each of them and start over.

Umm...no?

First of all you have no idea of the views of the franchise owner, secondly anybody has the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason (or they should, but that's gotten muddied in the recent years.)

They can be reprimanded, but they are no more "forced" to serve someone than you are "forced" to sell ammo to someone with a BLM shirt on.

 

[Darth]

Employees don't have First Amendment Rights while engaged in the employ of the owner.

First Amendment rights apply to the government limiting of speech, so yes, they do have first amendment rights while employed.

The owner can tall them what to say or not to say however.

 

[Darth]

Actually, you're not quite correct! Even protected activity such as "Organizing" (Right to Organize) workers, is not a "Protected Activity" while engaged in employer activity, you can do what you want while on break, say for lunch, but still, not on the employers property even.

You have no right to express your opinion on any subject matter unrelated to your employment, while being paid by your employer. Let alone in a setting where you interact with the public. Otherwise, you'd have to show me some precedent to the contrary ... You are reserved to perform the task or operation required by your employer for the compensation agreed upon. That's it... You don't get to "embellish or express opinion, or promote" any political, race identity, gender agenda, or religion, etc.

Here's a hypothetical for ya'...

Could you imagine calling a technical support line for a product you own, and the operator answers saying "Black Lives Matter", Welcome to (name company) Technical Support, how may I assist you?...

Yeah right!

Actually he's entirely correct, as the 1A deals with the government limiting of speech.

 

[ArmedCorgi]

First Amendment rights apply to the government limiting of speech, so yes, they do have first amendment rights while employed.

The owner can tall them what to say or not to say however.

Was that a head hair or a pubic hair you just split?

 

[Darth]

If I were the owner of that 5 guys, those employees would be let go.

Also, what a lot of people don't realize, is that the police are under no obligation to help you.
Police Have No Duty to Protect You, Federal Court Affirms Yet Again | Ryan McMaken

Warren v. District of Columbia - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So treating them like shit, when they have done nothing to hurt you personally is dumb. You can fight injustice in ways that don't penalize individuals who haven't personally hurt you and are just trying to serve the community.

So true. They have no obligation to help you.

So the idiots that say "When a crackhead breaks in, who you gonna call? Popeyes!? " should be answered with "Why not? They have the same duty to protect you."

 

[Darth]

Was that a head hair or a pubic hair you just split?

It was a merkin hair.

 

[ArmedCorgi]

It was a merkin hair.

Ah!, Carry on then.

 

[Catskillkid]

Beat me too it! I was going to post this and say it could worse. Could've gotten spit on their burger.

 

[holdover]

Umm...no?

First of all you have no idea of the views of the franchise owner, secondly anybody has the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason (or they should, but that's gotten muddied in the recent years.)

They can be reprimanded, but they are no more "forced" to serve someone than you are "forced" to sell ammo to someone with a BLM shirt on.

Ok fair play, Guess whos not coming to your next shooting? Guess whos not going to find out who fired a stray bullet that killed A kid? Guess who doesn't give a fuck whether you die or not? Guess who's not forced to answer calls at 2Am in bad neighborhoods?

Understood, They arent forced to serve anyone, But understand, there are two players in this game. They disrespect the law the uniform and the country . So if they expect those that serve to just run out to help them next time they need the police , its time for a reality check . Helps not coming.

I posted this so people who care wont eat 5 guys , not whether they have the right to refuse service, thats well established.

 

[Darth]

Ok fair play, Guess whos not coming to your next shooting? Guess whos not going to find out who fired a stray bullet that killed A kid? Guess who doesn't give a fuck whether you die or not? Guess who's not forced to answer calls at 2Am in bad neighborhoods?

Understood, They arent forced to serve anyone, But understand, there are two players in this game. They disrespect the law the uniform and the country . So if they expect those that serve to just run out to help them next time they need the police , its time for a reality check . Helps not coming.

I posted this so people who care wont eat 5 guys , not whether they have the right to refuse service, thats well established.

You say that as a "gotcha", but it's been established that cops have no duty to protect...