Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski Vows to Defeat the SAVE Act, Voter ID and Election Bill

[livingston]

Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski Vows to Defeat the SAVE Act, Voter ID and Election Bill​

It should not come as a surprise to see the Senator who lost her 2010 primary, then refused to leave congress and ran as a write in candidate; then supported changing the state voting system to a ranked choice structure; who then lost again in 2022 but ultimately won because Democrats all listed her as their second choice in the new structure; come out against anything that would lead to stronger voting requirements.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/lisa-murkowski.jpg
Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski has now pledged to vote against the SAVE Act. The SAVE Act would bar states from registering a person to vote unless they provide documents or evidence proving U.S. citizenship. It would also require all Americans to present ID when they go to vote. The SAVE Act is supported by President Trump and strongly opposed by GOPe members of the UniParty.

Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski Vows to Defeat the SAVE Act, Voter ID and Election Bill - The Last Refuge

It should not come as a surprise to see the Senator who lost her 2010 primary, then refused to leave congress and ran as a write in candidate; then supported changing the state voting system to a ranked choice structure; who then lost again in 2022 but ultimately won because Democrats all listed...

theconservativetreehouse.com

The legislation, introduced by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, has 48 GOP cosponsors and Trump has repeatedly called on Congress to pass it in recent days. Even if it gains a majority of the chamber, it is subject to the 60-vote threshold, and Democrats have vowed to block it.

MSN

 

[tirwin1]

The personification of a RINO.

 

[livingston]

THIS IS WHY THEY’RE PANICKING!​

 

[FP1201]

The personification of a RINO.

I was thinking "cunt" but either works.

 

[Zerex]

Evil......the Koran states clearly, that the root of all evil.......... is woman.....not money.

Biblical admonitions, too, are still valid today

 

[Celt]

I dont want people voting illegally.

But I am having a hard time getting behind voter id laws. I despise gun permits of any kind, and my struggle is with having another one of my rights restricted by requiring an id.

Can someone make an argument that the government mandating more reasons to prove id is a good thing?

 

[Robin]

If we had had un corrupted elections for the last seventy years there wouldn't be second amendment problems.
Robin

 

[livingston]

I dont want people voting illegally.

But I am having a hard time getting behind voter id laws. I despise gun permits of any kind, and my struggle is with having another one of my rights restricted by requiring an id.

Can someone make an argument that the government mandating more reasons to prove id is a good thing?

Do you know anyone over the age of 18 that does not have some form of government issued ID. ? The liberal talking point against voter ID is most black folks have not a clue on how to obtain one. ... This is an outright lie. Look to India for voting results ... One day voting can be done.
There is massive voter fraud in this country. ... We can complain about our gun rights being trampled upon... We will never get them back until we get fair elections . One thing I would like is have a national election day for this country ... One day off of all work just to vote. ... And only that day.

 

[FP1201]

I dont want people voting illegally.

But I am having a hard time getting behind voter id laws. I despise gun permits of any kind, and my struggle is with having another one of my rights restricted by requiring an id.

Can someone make an argument that the government mandating more reasons to prove id is a good thing?

Conversely, will you make argument(s) on why it isn't a good thing?

 

[fresch]

Keep in mind back in old 1776 people knew who you were in your voting places.
I'm sure voting was rigged back then too.

 

[Celt]

Conversely, will you make argument(s) on why it isn't a good thing?

I shouldnt need id to exercise my rights. But can you make an argument why I should?

 

[FP1201]

I shouldnt need id to exercise my rights. But can you make an argument why I should?

Perhaps no one should need to identify themselves, Guns being a primary focus here I revert to the days before the GCA of 1968 when buying a gun wasn't anymore complex than buying a Broom and Shovel.
I DO think there needs to be some sort of unambiguous means to insure no one votes more than once and that they are eligible to vote...Not that NY is free from voter fraud, the system we use seems to be pretty solid unless Poll Workers conspire to commit Fraud, which in a small location is unlikely.
Somewhere in SW Asia, there was a story about the emergence of Elections where previously they were a sham, voters dipped their finger in a purple indelible ink to signify they voted...How about a Finger print reader where you simply place a digit and it's matched against the database? Sounds good, until it gets back to the Fraud we have now with Electronic Voting Machines and the virtually daily proof that someone fucked with the results...No matter how good the encryption, people with or without authorization can and have gotten into these machines.
I wonder if Students still have to present ID before being allowed to take certain Tests? I had to.
Not being argumentative or dismissive, only trying to figure out why showing an identification, something virtually every American Adult but Rip Wheeler has.

 

[livingston]

 

[Celt]

Perhaps no one should need to identify themselves, Guns being a primary focus here I revert to the days before the GCA of 1968 when buying a gun wasn't anymore complex than buying a Broom and Shovel.
I DO think there needs to be some sort of unambiguous means to insure no one votes more than once and that they are eligible to vote...Not that NY is free from voter fraud, the system we use seems to be pretty solid unless Poll Workers conspire to commit Fraud, which in a small location is unlikely.
Somewhere in SW Asia, there was a story about the emergence of Elections where previously they were a sham, voters dipped their finger in a purple indelible ink to signify they voted...How about a Finger print reader where you simply place a digit and it's matched against the database? Sounds good, until it gets back to the Fraud we have now with Electronic Voting Machines and the virtually daily proof that someone fucked with the results...No matter how good the encryption, people with or without authorization can and have gotten into these machines.
I wonder if Students still have to present ID before being allowed to take certain Tests? I had to.
Not being argumentative or dismissive, only trying to figure out why showing an identification, something virtually every American Adult but Rip Wheeler has.

Appreciate the response, I think part of my issue is that no matter what system we come up with their will be a work around and the good people are still stuck with even more restrictions on our rights. I have very little trust in our govt, i feel it is far too corrupt to earn my trust. In practicality it wouldnt take much to show my license when i go vote, afterall i need to drive there anyway. But when states gives licenses to people who arent citizens, how does that help us? There are many ways people can get govt ids from multiple states too.
Its the incremental creep that concerns me, just like with our gun rights. Next thing you know ill need to show my govt id when crossing state lines. The powerful people that run the world frame issues in a way so that we support our own loss of freedom. Im not looking to play their game so thats why I asked the question. Facial recognition, finger prints, etc... the cats already out of the bag, but i dont like it. As it pertains to gun rights look at how the AFT created a gun owner database even though it is illegal to do so. The law doesnt matter to them, they are all above it, and we suffer the loss of freedom.

 

[Robin]

John Adams: 'Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.' — The Socratic Method

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. The quote by John Adams, "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other," carries profound m

www.socratic-method.com

Sadly, we pretty much are no longer that. People today think freedom and liberty mean they should be entitled to whatever sick twisted shit is being sold to them.
Robin

 

[repete]

I shouldnt need id to exercise my rights. But can you make an argument why I should?

Very simple, the words "shall not be infringed" appear only once and yet look at what has happened to our 2nd Amendment. With that in mind why wouldn't you be 'all in' for the use of a voter ID?

 

[Celt]

Very simple, the words "shall not be infringed" appear only once and yet look at what has happened to our 2nd Amendment. With that in mind why wouldn't you be 'all in' for the use of a voter ID?

What has happened to the 2nd Amendment is EXACTLY why I cant get behind any laws that diminish my rights or freedoms. When you willingly give the govt the authority to have an inch, they will ABSOLUTELY take a mile.

This famous quote from Ben Franklin describes how I see this.

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

 

[FP1201]

Appreciate the response, I think part of my issue is that no matter what system we come up with their will be a work around and the good people are still stuck with even more restrictions on our rights. I have very little trust in our govt, i feel it is far too corrupt to earn my trust. In practicality it wouldn't take much to show my license when i go vote, after all i need to drive there anyway. But when states gives licenses to people who aren't citizens, how does that help us? There are many ways people can get govt ids from multiple states too.
Its the incremental creep that concerns me, just like with our gun rights. Next thing you know ill need to show my govt id when crossing state lines. The powerful people that run the world frame issues in a way so that we support our own loss of freedom. I'm not looking to play their game so that's why I asked the question. Facial recognition, finger prints, etc... the cats already out of the bag, but i don't like it.

As it pertains to gun rights look at how the AFT created a gun owner database even though it is illegal to do so. The law doesn't matter to them, they are all above it, and we suffer the loss of freedom.

I believe you to be right, which is why such a majority of the Country voted for and elected Trump, we're sick of being cheated at the Polls, we've don't want our Streets and Neighborhoods flooded with People who take without assimilation, that many of the Laws governing guns are unconstitutional bullshit, and all these changes the Left is howling about are a result of their failed policies and desire to implement them with force.
Perhaps wiping the Voter Rolls clean and requiring a new Registration supported by positive identification is in order?
One or two elections with ID then letting things settle back to an Honest System?
I wonder how many People do shit like vote in one State, then travel South for the Winter and vote again there? (assuming Mail In Ballots) Trump clearly warned us about the subversive democrat machine, too bad he wasn't able to stop it...maybe that four year pause opened the eyes of people that though they were doing the lords work throwing the election...doesn't matter what happened, only what we do going forward.

 

[Cavalry]

I shouldnt need id to exercise my rights. But can you make an argument why I should?

I like the concept of proving who you are to vote. I'm not one for extra costs and enforcement is problematic, but how about indelable ink on the right forefinger to vote?
You can still lie about who you are but you get one vote as it should be.

 

[livingston]

Schumer: ‘MAGA Right’ Doesn’t Want Poor People or People of Color to Vote​

Schumer said, “We have the voter ID laws that, first, each state can have its own voter ID laws, and some do and some don’t. But secondly, what they are proposing in this so-called SAVE Act is like Jim Crow 2.0. They make it so hard to get any kind of voter ID that more than 20 million legitimate people, mainly poor people and people of color, will not be able to vote under this law. We will not let it pass in the Senate. We are fighting it tooth and nail. It’s an outrageous proposal that is, you know, that shows the sort of political bias of the MAGA right. They don’t want poor people to vote. They don’t want people of color to vote because they often don’t vote for them.”

Schumer: 'MAGA Right' Doesn't Want Poor People or People of Color to Vote

Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said the "MAGA right" did not want people of color or poor people to vote. | Clips

www.breitbart.com

They make it so hard to get any kind of voter ID that more than 20 million legitimate people, mainly poor people and people of color, will not be able to vote
He has that confused as to what liberals did with being able to get a gun permit

 

[Cavalry]

They make it so hard to get any kind of voter ID that more than 20 million legitimate people, mainly poor people and people of color, will not be able to vote
He has that confused as to what liberals did with being able to get a gun permit

Thankfully if one is too poor to have ID (which is bullshit itself) that person had one of these government IDs.

 

[livingston]

 

[Rocpo]

Maybe the hair made him smarter.

 

[Defilade]

It should be illegal for a man in this condition to hold public office.

"

 

[livingston]

It should be illegal for a man in this condition to hold public office.

"

Mitch McConnell Blocks Save Act from Being Brought to a Vote on the Senate Floor​

McConnell is 84 and is failing fast. He has no idea what is going on. But he does know he hates Trump, and that keeps him getting out of bed in the morning to screw the people of Kentucky and the US.

Rep. Burchett: Mitch McConnell Blocks Save Act from Being Brought to a Vote on the Senate Floor | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Mitch McConnell's handlers are blocking the SAVE Act from being brought to a vote on the Senate Floor.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Zerex]

BLM busses full loads of "voters" from precinct to precinct in Boston, neary by new Hampshire so that nearly all BLM voters may vote 35 times, including mail in ballots and phone box stuffers.

All the Bolshevic cities take advantage of trusting 1776 mentalities.

TRUST but Verify.

 

[Robin]

Gut wrenching! All of it!
Robby

 

[livingston]

Senate Majority Leader John Thune Refuses to Use Talking Filibuster to Pass SAVE America Act​

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) is still dragging his feet on using the “talking filibuster” tactic to get the SAVE America Act passed, arguing that there is not a “unified Republican conference” to do so and that it would be “very hard” to end the ongoing partial government shutdown.

John Thune Refuses to Use Talking Filibuster to Pass SAVE America Act

Senate Majority Leader John Thune is still dragging his feet on using the "talking filibuster" tactic to get the SAVE America Act passed.

www.breitbart.com

 

[livingston]

RINO Lisa Murkowski Moves to WEAKEN SAVE America Act — Files Amendment Letting Pre-1961 Births BYPASS Citizenship Proof Requirements​

RINO Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) is now attempting to gut key provisions of the SAVE America Act, filing an amendment that would allow individuals born before 1961 to bypass proof-of-citizenship requirements when registering to vote.

The Gateway Pundit has repeatedly exposed RINO betrayals and efforts to undermine election integrity, including Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s (R-AK) history of siding with Democrats on key issues that weaken conservative priorities.

Just weeks ago, we reported how this Alaska senator flat-out refused to support the SAVE America Act, parroting leftist talking points about “disenfranchising” voters while ignoring the real threat of non-citizen voting that threatens our republic.
Now, Murkowski is doubling down on her sabotage. The RINO senator has filed an amendment to the SAVE America Act that would weaken the bill’s core citizenship proof requirements, specifically allowing individuals born before 1961 to bypass providing documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote.

RINO Lisa Murkowski Moves to WEAKEN SAVE America Act — Files Amendment Letting Pre-1961 Births BYPASS Citizenship Proof Requirements | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

RINO Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) is now attempting to gut key provisions of the SAVE America Act, filing an amendment that would allow individuals born before 1961 to bypass proof-of-citizenship requirements when registering to vote.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[livingston]