And asses..
Request: no inappropriate avatars or signatures
- Thread starter shoot2much
- Start date
- Status
And asses..
Damn, NO animation?
Oooh snap! That's crazy lool
Justincase
.308 Win
I've suddenly developed a foot fetish.
Marlinspike
22lr
Not for nothin, but... What's the definition of "inappropriate?"
I'm not criticizing I'm just wondering for a couple reasons.
I'm not criticizing I'm just wondering for a couple reasons.
MikeyCNY
6.5 Creedmoor
I'm squinting, and I'm not seeing feet..
The forum is supposed to be 'Safe For Work', which traditionally means no nudity. I only read this forum at home, and occasionally on my phone, so I don't have much of an issue. But if someone is viewing this from work and a co-worker (or boss!) sees nudity, that can be bad...
I know what you're going to say.. it's a gun forum. But text about guns is different than nudity. Just my
?
Citation needed.
And I don't mean this in a dick way, but it refers back to the original argument. Who decides what is "safe for work?" If you work in hildabeat's office, a squirt gun triggers your lame ass. Who gets to decide what is OK?
Not me, certainly. No, we need not decide what is "OK." We need to decide who and why were are upsetting people for and for what reasons.
And we need to keep this forum completely 100% free and unadulterated as it has been all along, as the heavy majority of members have claimed the happiness of the freedoms we all now have here..
shoot2much
.40 S&W
Ok, later guys. Thanks for your time!
MikeyCNY
6.5 Creedmoor
http://nygunforum.com/threads/ny-gun-forum-rules.24/
Marking threads this way allows people to not click them, possibly viewing partial (or even full) nudity, or even pictures of fully automatic and suppressed weapons (in this state). If someone has an 'offensive' avatar you can't control whether you see it unless you ignore someone in the forum settings, and I really hope we don't need to go that route..
Again, it doesn't bother me, but I can see how it would be troublesome for some people.
The problem is not being unable to read a FAQ. The problem is who decided what is "family friendly."
MikeyCNY
6.5 Creedmoor
Fair enough. I've seen online communities discuss the same regarding what is 'NSFW'.. "if you work at Playboy nudity is safe LOL".. or if you work at CNN all gun-related sites are NSFW..
I consider "family friendly" to be, would you allow your young child to view it in front of you? Bad words are one thing (they hear/say worse in school), but nudity and other graphic content, I think everyone would agree is too much. At least in this country... other countries are more open about nudity, but shy away from 'adult language'.
If it was Ron Jeremy railing some chick, I could say "yeah, could you maybe look into that" (but not really, I have the option to look away, but if I were to concede something.)
An ass, to me, isn't all that terrible. How about a vagina? "CERTAINLY NOT!" Really? You kind of came out of one. Me too. "But they are too young to remember, or care!" Right. Exactly correct. Who cares?
And nothing was ever displayed in a disrespectful manner. It's the left that does that crap.
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
In Europe is quite the opposite. Nudity is totally acceptable in TV and many places as it is natural. We all own the equipment.
But having a young child watching someone being slaughtered, raped or blown to pieces is a lot more serious because it is not natural.
I find it funny censoring nudity and then sometimes let very young kids be exposed to some of the violence, drugs and torture
we see everywhere unrated. I don't mean it like other cultures are better but some things just don't make a lot of sense like if we were all
puritans from Mass. and just arrived in the Mayflower.
When I travel one of the things I enjoy the most is to have a beer with lunch at work in the office cafeteria in Germany or a nice wine in the corporate cafeteria in Spain. And guess what, nobody gets drunk or anything like that.
Sometimes I feel Americans want to enforce and control so many things that in the end they don't control shit. Is a little like the SAFE act. As a society we are beyond retarded now. ....sorry mentally challenged.
Greywolf224
6.5 Creedmoor
Your avatar is offensive...if I could only make it out!
And this stuff right here? Perfect example of why last person on earth scenario is a fantasy to me and not a nightmare.
Bananabandit
.338 Win Mag
Pussification...this thread is doing it right.
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
Wildmans avatar?
timboy
.44 mag
General forum etiquette is no nudity unless in a NWS area,I dont really know why so many people are being twats about this but it is the interwebz so its to be expected.
Does seeing a nekkid bottom offend me,no but if my kids were younger I might not surf on a site that had them while they were around either.
Does seeing a nekkid bottom offend me,no but if my kids were younger I might not surf on a site that had them while they were around either.
Last edited:
Clipazine
.45 acp
This is offended, and I am an avatar.
I'm afraid I disagree Tim. I've never once met a young kid that saw a butt and said "OMG! Now I am a sexual deviant!", or "Daddy!? What is that!?" and then have the dad be flabbergasted.
The human body, any part of it, is not offensive to me. And I'd let anyone see it.
Last edited:
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
It's the OREO isn't IT??
Clipazine
.45 acp
You're willfully promoting an unhealthy diet. Shame on you!
Bananabandit
.338 Win Mag
You sound ridiculous.
Is that the thing around the nipple?
- Status