Shootout in Seattle caught on ring

[Saltwater60]

I love how the popo rep says they don’t encourage people to shoot at others but you have a right to protect your property. Three armed men are kicking in your door that’s a direct and immediate threat to your life.

WATCH: Ring Camera Catches Homeowner Shooting At Three Masked Men

A Washington homeowner shot at three masked men last week after they attempted to kick his door in, claiming to be police.

www.gunsamerica.com

 

[FP1201]

I love how the popo rep says they don’t encourage people to shoot at others but you have a right to protect your property. Three armed men are kicking in your door that’s a direct and immediate threat to your life.

WATCH: Ring Camera Catches Homeowner Shooting At Three Masked Men

A Washington homeowner shot at three masked men last week after they attempted to kick his door in, claiming to be police.

www.gunsamerica.com

A predominant trait exists here, one that'll be ignored...too bad the home owner's shot pulled left, I'd like to have seen a thug get what he had coming.

 

[Beerman]

How do you think that would end for the homeowner in NYS? I’m 60-40 that the homeowner would not be charged if their firearm(s) were lawfully possessed. It would still take months, lawyer(s) and money to be cleared of any wrongdoing, though.

 

[Pale Rider]

How do you think that would end for the homeowner in NYS? I’m 60-40 that the homeowner would not be charged if their firearm(s) were lawfully possessed. It would still take months, lawyer(s) and money to be cleared of any wrongdoing, though.

That's why you have armedcitizensnetwork.org.

 

[camper4lyfe]

Meanwhile, there's sheriffs out there that would say "please shoot them, it'll save us a lot of work." Freaking Seattle is a joke.

 

[Saltwater60]

How do you think that would end for the homeowner in NYS? I’m 60-40 that the homeowner would not be charged if their firearm(s) were lawfully possessed. It would still take months, lawyer(s) and money to be cleared of any wrongdoing, though.

I don’t think any jury would say the homeowners lives were not in danger. If I were ever on a jury involving any gun crime unless they were a straight up murderer or criminal I’d never vote to convict. The judge would be giving me instructions on what the law says and I’d still be saying not guilty. 30-round mags and full AR’s not guilty.

 

[byron]

more vid of this one plus another one armed home invasions reported in Kent

Washington homeowner opens fire on masked men claiming to be police

A homeowner in Washington opened fire on three masked men who claimed to be police officers as they kicked down his front door.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[GOYABEAN]

A Claymore would be perfect in these circumstances

 

[spat]

How do you think that would end for the homeowner in NYS? I’m 60-40 that the homeowner would not be charged if their firearm(s) were lawfully possessed. It would still take months, lawyer(s) and money to be cleared of any wrongdoing, though.

Probably 100% chance of being charged in 60% of the counties, and 0% chance in the other 40%.

 

[Acer-m14]

 

[dwa12479]

Shoot the first and word will spread. Thats a pretty solid entry door hes got there. Good thing it kept the dirtbags out.

 

[S&W Fan]

I’d take my chances being judged by 12 verses being carried by 6

 

[fresch]

Anyone have trap door plans?
Drop them and after a week in the hole we can address how they would like to spend time working for me, or not.
Work gets you food and water, no work gets the poop valves opened to the hole.

 

[pshift]

Just use a laser and a cat. Point the laser directly at the crooks, and don't forget to record the hilarity....

 

[Vapor]

A Claymore would be perfect in these circumstances

Two handed swords are nice but I personally prefer war hammers...oh wait

 

[Nevar]

On Long Island The home owner would be locked up with a ton of bull shit charges. Only the fukin hero's in blue can defend them selves and family.