DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Supposedly the Supreme Court will over turn roe v wade
- Thread starter Saltwater60
- Start date
spat
.950 JDJ
If she ignores SCOTUS, the we are free to ignore her.Mad Max is on the loose:
. . . Maxine Waters: "To Hell With the Supreme Court, We Will Defy Them" - The Liberty Daily
If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. Sounds like a real insurrection is coming. Radical-Leftist Maxine Waters says “to hell with the Supreme Court, we will defy them!” Sounds very insurrectiony for a member of Congress. pic.twitter.com/hqkpbpFXyP — ForAmerica...thelibertydaily.com
Her authority derives solely from the constitution. If she wants to eliminate that, then she's just another drunk in a pant suit.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
And yet this is a guy that probably doesn't want me to have firearms to be able to protect myself and my family. BTW, did twatter consider this hate speech and remove the post?
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
spat
.950 JDJ
Someone needs to reply to that tweet with "woman" crossed out and replaced with "birthing person" and a FIFY.
Then someone else needs to point out that the whole point of an an abortion it to not become a "birthing person" to begin with...
My reply to the whole "if you're not a woman you don't get an opinion" argument is "I used to be a fetus, so yes I do".
The whole pro abortion argument is based on the false assertion that there is only one person involved in that decision.
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
One could cut the irony with a chainsaw.
Carlos Hathcock
.450/400 Nitro Ex
As stated previously. Any conservative republican makes this statement and they're SWATed before the digital ink is dry but this fucker will most likely be riding around town atop Democrat shoulders. Tell me I'm wrong.
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Probably one of the most realistic and reasonable opinions in here.
And the argument of "why is it ok to abort an unwanted child but not kill a wanted child in the womb" is already answered. "WANT". The decision should be up to the couple who created it, not some religious zealot who doesn't give a damn once it pops out.
I've never been a fan of aborting a fetus once it can survive outside the womb. Most cases at that point are for the health of the mother, and instead of aborting you can perform a c-section and put it in an incubator.
And, with the prevalence of contraception, at least for now, there is rarely need for the procedure. At least until the bible-thumpers start getting contraception banned also (which they ARE demanding. Just go take a look in Gab to see how fanatical they have become).
My worry, however, is this will set precedent that the .gov of a State can make laws concerning what happens to your body, ie: covid "vaccine" edicts.
Hmmm.... funny what people think the word of God says or does not say.
Ga 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
This SC decision is really going to cause a conundrum for me this weekend regarding which sporting event I'm going to watch. Baseball or the rioting? Decisions decisions.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Wonder if he is concerned about his safety. He's really putting the pedal to the metal.
More along the lines of, snip the umbilical cord inutero. It's not killing it, it's just no longer providing biological resources from the bearer. Pull it out (intact), if it can live on its own without any special resources then you have a person, if it can't then it's not a person.
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
The Great Chief to one of his squaws: Ugg, fetch me drum!
Chief's squaw: War Drum?
Chiefy: NO!! Condrum! Chief, him wants piece/peace!!
That's all I's gots.
spat
.950 JDJ
Viability is the standard in most states right now IIRC. That is pretty close to what you're asking.
They are entitled to normal life support though, unless you think a premature infant isn't a human until they take it out of the incubator.
As for surviving without any assistance, I think declaring all food stamp recipients "non persons" might be a bit drastic.
spat
.950 JDJ
Don't need any new laws. Don't need any abortion specific laws at all.
Just the one against murder, and the medical exceptions it already contains.
They just need to define at what point a new person comes into existence. That's it. Once you make that determination everything else is already well settled, and not widely disputed.
I disagree with the "want" determination. Why does what the parents "want" enter into it ? It's either a person or it isn't. An unwanted person is still a person.
It is funny when people like you can't read Scriptures properly or downplays the doctrines. Yes, believers are set free from the bondage of sin and men, but they becomes servants and slaves to Christ (their "freedom"). Did you not read 1 Cor 7:22-23 where believers are called slaves to Christ? Did you not read when Paul calls himself a servant in many occasions? Paul in Galatians 5:1 was speaking about believers being told they needed to be circumcised and obey the old law (what the whole book is about); Christ has you set free from that but that doesn't mean you are free to do whatever you want (you are still slaves to God, to Christ!). If you slaves to another being, be it man or deity, you are weak (whatever your theology would have you believe or pretend that "it is really good man").
Romans 6:22
But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God, the fruit you get leads to sanctification and its end, eternal life.
1 Corinthians 7:22-23
For he who was called in the Lord as a slave is a freedman of the Lord. Likewise he who was free when called is a slave of Christ. You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men.
Romans 1:1
Paul, a slave of Christ Jesus, called as an apostle and singled out for God's good news
Last edited:
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
I don’t think comparing gut biome is an adequate argument. Gut biome will never be anything but more gut biome. An eg that is dividing will turn into whatever the parent organism is. I get your point and it’s valid, but I think the distinct DNA does matter because the lefts logic of its part of the mother is faulty logic. If the fetus has different DNA it’s not part of the mother and only housed inside the mother.
Funny how the left cares more for the animals in the forest than humans.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
Interesting take on God and praying but I think you’ve been misinformed. Praying on your knees is because you are showing God respect and submitting to his rules. It’s your choice to do it or not do it and he won’t force you so weakness inst part of it. You may think that’s weakness, but it’s harder to do than anything else most have ever done.
spat
.950 JDJ
Yea, disturbing an unfertilized turtle egg is a crime against humanity, but murdering a baby minutes before it takes it's first breath is a woman's natural right.
That is why I think the right demarcation needs to be brain activity. That is the only thing that truly separates humans from livestock.
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
spat
.950 JDJ
The Babylon Bee should write an article about how the left is outraged that their religious right to sacrifice babies is being infringed on...
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Well Democrats do still have their collective god of climate control and god of renewable energy...sooo