About time. Time to squash bans permanently.
Let’s see about that with how these clowns have been voting lately
About time. Time to squash bans permanently.
They will come through. We will win it. If we don’t win it every gun will be banned by name or type moving forward in some states. It’s the most popular weapon in America.This is the only hope for relief in NY.
GOD PLEASE LET THIS WORK.
They will come through. We will win it. If we don’t win it every gun will be banned by name or type moving forward in some states. It’s the most popular weapon in America.
My guess is this will open the door to permits like handguns where everyone you own is listed.

Odds are they will strike down the particular ban this case is about, but do it in a way that lower courts can interpret the result however they want when it comes to other bans.Fingers crossed, but I'm not holding my breath. It wouldn't surprise me in the least to see the following outcome:
- Capacity bans legal
- Can't ban rifles by type/name, but can ban them by "evil features"
Odds are they will strike down the particular ban this case is about, but do it in a way that lower courts can interpret the result however they want when it comes to other bans.
"This ban is ruled unconstitutional on the basis that the governor who enacted it wasn't wearing the official state beanie when he signed the bill, we have not evaluated any other aspects of the law".
With a separate filing from Thomas that just says "Seriously guys? "
You can be sure that our overlords in Albany already have a bill written to counter any possible good ruling. The ink wasn't dry on Bruen before they had the CCIA teed up.We will see, but NY already has a law requiring a semi auto rifle permit that scotus alr3ady said is ok.. so, maybe full featured rifles will be legal here, but it will be registered the same as a handgun or else!
Fuck these crooked politicians.
Yup, pretty much what I was getting at. The laws they're looking at specifically target named weapons. They might declare that to be unconstitutional, but will almost certainly be completely silent about "evil features."Odds are they will strike down the particular ban this case is about, but do it in a way that lower courts can interpret the result however they want when it comes to other bans.
"This ban is ruled unconstitutional on the basis that the governor who enacted it wasn't wearing the official state beanie when he signed the bill, we have not evaluated any other aspects of the law".
With a separate filing from Thomas that just says "Seriously guys? "
Good to see you C!Unfortunately you are correct but the more blocks that keep getting made are eventually going to make them run out of steam.