Most (if not all) of these commentators are using clickbait titles because they know that clicks equals money. I wonder how many of them do any training on a regular basis. Sure, they are 'supporters' of the 2A until some other money making opportunity comes along. The guy with the glasses is the worst of them all. He just re-hashes information AFTER pouring out his thoroughly scripted "but first a word from our supporters" (2 monites of fluf with no informaiton). ALso, his backgroundf is thoroughly fake as well.
Temporary Restaining Order Issued For Concealed Carry Improvement Act (merged thread)
- Thread starter Glock_USA
- Start date
camper4lyfe
.308 Win
I realize he's a content creator, but a lot of them are becoming just as bad as MSM; creating stories that aren't there. If there's nothing new to report, don't report anything. All of these "breaking news" reports are getting old when all that really happened is that a justice sneezed or something.
misunderestimated
.223 Rem
BREAKING NEWS, THIS JUST IN,EPIC,
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
More of the same…. Or are we still waiting for scotus because they all know how scotus will rule?
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Hochul proposes ‘technical’ changes to concealed carry law
- Feb. 03, 2023,
The proposals were included in Hochul’s executive budget, released Wednesday, and seek to update the state’s retooled concealed carry laws, enacted in July following a U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down the state’s longtime rules governing the possession and concealment of firearms in public.
Hochul proposes ‘technical’ changes to concealed carry law
The proposals were included in Hochul’s executive budget.
www.syracuse.com
camper4lyfe
.308 Win
This shit pisses me off that it's tied to the budget, or anything other than a stand alone bill, to be honest. What a crock of shit.
arp228
.38 Special
I don't understand why none of the lawsuits in NY challenged the exemption of retired law enforcement being exempt from the sensitive and restricted places. This is being challenged in Illinois in their Assault Weapons Ban under the Equal Protection Clause and so far both a federal judge and state judge have ruled it unconstitutional saying that carving out exceptions for certain citizens but not for others violates the Equal Protection ClauseHochul proposes ‘technical’ changes to concealed carry law
Albany, N.Y. — Gov. Kathy Hochul is seeking a number of “technical” revisions to New York’s contested concealed carry laws, including allowing armed security guards at places of worship and providing clearer guidelines for retired law enforcement officers in good standing to possess a firearm in a “sensitive location.”
- Feb. 03, 2023,
The proposals were included in Hochul’s executive budget, released Wednesday, and seek to update the state’s retooled concealed carry laws, enacted in July following a U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down the state’s longtime rules governing the possession and concealment of firearms in public.
Hochul proposes ‘technical’ changes to concealed carry law
The proposals were included in Hochul’s executive budget.
Yes I just read that. It's as if there isn't another Bill Of Rights for people depending on where they work. Who knew?
I also see that Hochul is changing the safe storage law to exempt cops. Lol. Stolen guns are cool as long as it was stolen from a dipshit cop evidently.
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
Whorchul is just reaching, because eventually, she`ll lose more than she gained.Hochul proposes ‘technical’ changes to concealed carry law
Albany, N.Y. — Gov. Kathy Hochul is seeking a number of “technical” revisions to New York’s contested concealed carry laws, including allowing armed security guards at places of worship and providing clearer guidelines for retired law enforcement officers in good standing to possess a firearm in a “sensitive location.”
- Feb. 03, 2023,
The proposals were included in Hochul’s executive budget, released Wednesday, and seek to update the state’s retooled concealed carry laws, enacted in July following a U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down the state’s longtime rules governing the possession and concealment of firearms in public.
Hochul proposes ‘technical’ changes to concealed carry law
The proposals were included in Hochul’s executive budget.
ManualF150
.308 Win
Just reaching? I think she's doing a phenomenal job at blocking our 2A rights.
Remember, she's also the one that told retired and active duty LEOs that they can't carry, unless on duty at the NYS Fair. Even though she retracted it after a couple days, I'm sure she felt butt hurt on retracting it.
Hierlevelz
9mm
His clickbait titles irritates me.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
That’s it, drop the lawsuits as our problems are solved.Hochul proposes ‘technical’ changes to concealed carry law
Albany, N.Y. — Gov. Kathy Hochul is seeking a number of “technical” revisions to New York’s contested concealed carry laws, including allowing armed security guards at places of worship and providing clearer guidelines for retired law enforcement officers in good standing to possess a firearm in a “sensitive location.”
- Feb. 03, 2023,
The proposals were included in Hochul’s executive budget, released Wednesday, and seek to update the state’s retooled concealed carry laws, enacted in July following a U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down the state’s longtime rules governing the possession and concealment of firearms in public.
Hochul proposes ‘technical’ changes to concealed carry law
The proposals were included in Hochul’s executive budget.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
Hochul proposes ‘technical’ changes to concealed carry law
Albany, N.Y. — Gov. Kathy Hochul is seeking a number of “technical” revisions to New York’s contested concealed carry laws, including allowing armed security guards at places of worship and providing clearer guidelines for retired law enforcement officers in good standing to possess a firearm in a “sensitive location.”
- Feb. 03, 2023,
The proposals were included in Hochul’s executive budget, released Wednesday, and seek to update the state’s retooled concealed carry laws, enacted in July following a U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down the state’s longtime rules governing the possession and concealment of firearms in public.
Hochul proposes ‘technical’ changes to concealed carry law
The proposals were included in Hochul’s executive budget.
here we go again .. hey judge we changed the law .. case is moot now ..
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
YUP! She was probably told by her soldiers to back off or all of the other communist states will be doomed by her own ass whoopin coming from the SCOTUS, whenever that gets around to happening. If anything reaches the SCOTUS, that sets it up for the whole country, not just NY. But by backing off, it will only stay within NY. We`ve all seen NY do this in the past. And they will keep doing it for other cases so that they become "moot".
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
Until we see the NY UnSafe-Act AND the CCIA, BOTH 100% destroyed, NY people will STILL be second class citizens.
spat
.950 JDJ
What if weapons are part of my religion ?
And that's not just sci-fi with the mandalorians.
The Sikhs have a millenia old tradition of *requiring weapon possession at all times*. Most people are familiar with the turbans (idiots mistake them for Muslims, who don't generally require turbans) but also highly important to their religion is that men are armed at all times. In modern practice this is satisfied by carrying a ceremonial dagger. I can't think of any reason why a sect couldn't change that to a pistol as a modern interpretation.
Last edited:
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
That won’t change that we are second class citizens in NYS. We will have gun rights but I’ll still be hated by her and I will still pay way more taxes than I ever get services worth out of here.
"I don't understand why none of the lawsuits in NY challenged the exemption of retired law enforcement being exempt from the sensitive and restricted places."
These exemptions are immaterial, as retired police officers are already exempt by LEOSA.
These exemptions are immaterial, as retired police officers are already exempt by LEOSA.
maverick52
.223 Rem
I know it’s easy to be cynical but I believe that things will turn in our favor. The third circuit is backing Bruen. CA, OR, IL and MA are all seeking laws overturned. SCOTUS issued a veiled warning to the Second Circuit. I think NYS will lose on 3/20 and we will win. I also think the Safe Act lawsuit will be won too. They asked for more time to research for their defense which shows they have no defense. I strongly believe that by the end of 2023 we will have some freedom back. I’m sure there are more fights in the horizon, but we must stay the course
ManualF150
.308 Win
I sure hope you are right.
I've been kind of laughing about all of this, but also really pissed all at once...
As they say it... "A right delayed, is a right denied!".
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I'll have whatever you're having.
Bustedknees
12-gauge slug (smooth bore)
This will all be over when Houcul is out of office in 11.5 years from now.
US RIFLE M1A
.45 acp
LEOSA is not anywhere near as powerful as most think it is, especially since cops get away with carrying more because they are generally law abiding, squared away and in the case of retired guys, old looking, which is also a plus.
LEOSA does not exempt the individual carrying a weapon from following laws of the state they are visiting, does not exempt them from on/near school grounds restrictions, they cannot carry in national parks, post offices, and cannot carry in areas of the state deemed sensitive areas unless the state law specifically exempts them.
LEOSA is an 'affirmative defense' in that it asks a judge to find the defendant 'not guilty' of the act of carrying a firearm, but they must readily admit that they did carry the firearm, but were justified to do so under the LEOSA law. The LEOSA card IS NOT a 'handgun license valid in 50 states' which I have heard officers describe it as.
An on-duty officer encountering someone carrying under LEOSA can make an arrest for possessing an unlicensed firearm, especially if the circumstances of the encounter are such that it is best to haul everyone down to the station house and sort it out there. They will most likely be sent on their way with a handshake and an apology, but under no circumstances is it anywhere near the same as having a carry license from the state you are visiting.
I am soon to be in a situation in which the (about a dozen) licenses in my wallet, combined with reciprocity agreements and Constitutional carry, lower the number of states in which I must place the handgun in the trunk to around 5 states. And I can carry in national parks in those states, which is a major feature of travel, especially out west. I would much rather have that than LEOSA.
Last edited:
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
My gut feeling says you`re wrong. The gun grabbers will never stop. But regardless, i`m pretty old, so my life time is nearing its end of the road. I had always hoped that i would see us all free again before my time is up, but like i said, my gut feeling, is that the coming years, seem pretty sketchy from where i see this country is heading. Not enough people are willing to fight for freedom anymore. Big brother watches everything you do, everything you say, where you go, what you spend your money on. People are to comfortable. God forbid if someone lost their cell phone for 10 seconds. The gun culture spent to many years pissing on each other. Certain gun owners aren`t concerned if a gun law passes that doesn`t effect "them" personally. Then they get all pissed off when it does effect what they have/own. The gun culture did this to themselves. Ignorance is bliss. But i wish all you younger folks alotta luck. Freedom isn`t free, anywhere. You will have to fight alot harder now.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
when the LEO's are writing bogus traffic tickets ..
hudsonvalleypost.com
LEOSA can go bye bye .... ... special class of citizens
DA: New York State Trooper Issued Bogus Tickets In Hudson Valley
A New York State Trooper is accused of issuing over 30 fake traffic tickets in the Hudson Valley, including one to a person who was dead.
LEOSA can go bye bye .... ... special class of citizens
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
2A group: Hochul's proposed tweaks to NY carry laws just "smoke and mirrors"
Honestly, I think that might be giving the governor’s proposed changes a little too much credit. The modifications to the Concealed Carry “Improvement” Act that Kathy Hochul wants to see in place are so minor that I’m honestly not sure why she included them in her recent budget proposal. Gun owners certainly aren’t going to be mollified by the suggested changes, and if anything they could make the state’s legal defense even harder than it already is.
2A group: Hochul's proposed tweaks to NY carry laws just "smoke and mirrors"
Honestly, I think that might be giving the governor’s proposed changes a little too much credi
bearingarms.com
JunkBoxFull
.308 Win
"The modifications to the Concealed Carry “Improvement” Act that Kathy Hochul wants to see in place are so minor that I’m honestly not sure why she included them in her recent budget proposal."2A group: Hochul's proposed tweaks to NY carry laws just "smoke and mirrors"
Honestly, I think that might be giving the governor’s proposed changes a little too much credit. The modifications to the Concealed Carry “Improvement” Act that Kathy Hochul wants to see in place are so minor that I’m honestly not sure why she included them in her recent budget proposal. Gun owners certainly aren’t going to be mollified by the suggested changes, and if anything they could make the state’s legal defense even harder than it already is.
2A group: Hochul's proposed tweaks to NY carry laws just "smoke and mirrors"
Honestly, I think that might be giving the governor’s proposed changes a little too much credi
She`s only doing it just to show her voter base that she`s, DOING, something. "well, i tried"
"LEOSA does not exempt the individual carrying a weapon from following laws of the state they are visiting, does not exempt them from on/near school grounds restrictions, they cannot carry in national parks, post offices, and cannot carry in areas of the state deemed sensitive areas unless the state law specifically exempts them."
Not true. LEOSA exempts Police officers and qualified retired police officers from all state and local concealed handgun laws, with two exceptions. Those exceptions involve private property and government property. Areas deemed sensitive by the state have no effect on this.
(b) This section shall not be construed to supersede or limit the laws of any State that--
(1) permit private persons or entities to prohibit or restrict the possession of concealed firearms on their property; or
(2) prohibit or restrict the possession of firearms on any State or local government property, installation, building, base, or park.
Not true. LEOSA exempts Police officers and qualified retired police officers from all state and local concealed handgun laws, with two exceptions. Those exceptions involve private property and government property. Areas deemed sensitive by the state have no effect on this.
§ 926C. Carrying of concealed firearms by qualified retired law enforcement officers
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of the law of any State or any political subdivision thereof, an individual who is a qualified retired law enforcement officer and who is carrying the identification required by subsection (d) may carry a concealed firearm that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, subject to subsection (b).(b) This section shall not be construed to supersede or limit the laws of any State that--
(1) permit private persons or entities to prohibit or restrict the possession of concealed firearms on their property; or
(2) prohibit or restrict the possession of firearms on any State or local government property, installation, building, base, or park.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
From the comments section
Dragonstalon1001
1 day agoNew York is trying to affect the current 2nd Amendment Lawsuits, like they did in a previous New York Pistol and Rifle Association vs City of New York lawsuit that was headed for the U.S. Supreme Court and was thrown out for 'Mootness', which made the Lawsuit need to be refiled and start back at the beginning once they had more Plaintiff's that showed they were affected exactly the same as the previous Plaintiff's.