Temporary Restaining Order Issued For Concealed Carry Improvement Act (merged thread)

Acer-m14

Acer-m14

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,957
Reaction score
38,562
Location
Livingston
Beerman said:
Having home/fire insurance policy while out in public is completely lawful, even if caught carrying it. Having car insurance is required by law. Having health insurance was mandated for a few years, too. Having those things, and using them, will not get you thrown in the clink. And none of them are protected by the Constitution. Think about that.
Click to expand...

and people still drive cars with no insurance or license ;)



people still still do not have health insurance ..

people still do not have home owners insurance


^^^ me i live in a 1965 trailer and own it .. cant get it .. ..

can't get fire insurance for it either ..
 
Beerman

Beerman

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,092
Reaction score
3,210
Location
Deep in the Adirondacks
Acer-m14 said:
and people still drive cars with no insurance or license ;)



people still still do not have health insurance ..

people still do not have home owners insurance


^^^ me i live in a 1965 trailer and own it .. cant get it .. ..

can't get fire insurance for it either ..
Click to expand...
What happens if you use your insurance, though? Will you be arrested for using your healthcare insurance? Will you be arrested in NYS for using your holstered, concealed “insurance plan” that JchrisIs mentioned? See the difference? It’s not the same. A handgun might be insurance, but it can’t be compared to car insurance or homeowner’s, or healthcare.
 
Acer-m14

Acer-m14

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,957
Reaction score
38,562
Location
Livingston
defense gun insurance is banned in NY ..

just like my house insurance is because it a trailer and old ..
 
Slacker43

Slacker43

.40 S&W
Messages
171
Reaction score
377
Location
Broome County prny
rmosh said:
Your rhetoric sounds great and all, and I completely agree with it but.........are you going to be paying my court fees, defense fees and supporting my family while I am being convicted of an unjust law? It means fuckall whether or not a law is just or not, if it is enforced than it is the law. Period. Full stop. Unless you are rich of course, than the law doesn't apply to you.
Click to expand...
Should I pay your college loans too??? It is not "rhetoric". I carry all day every day. This is quite the comment coming on independence day weekend lol. You do whatever you need to buttercup. I'm going to continue to be an American and follow the constitution. I'm not rich. If something happens I will deal with it. That's life and that's how I live it. It is no law if it is not in line with the constitution. Full stop. Period.

This comment is exactly why we will never see another civil war or any uprising against confiscation when it happens. No one will give up their cushy life for their rights. This once great country is on its way down the other side unless this way of thinking changes real quick. It's all about me, me, me. People don't cherish what this nation is and that will be our downfall.
 
Slacker43

Slacker43

.40 S&W
Messages
171
Reaction score
377
Location
Broome County prny
rmosh said:
What's the point in concealed carry if you never use it? A security blanket? If you DO use it you are right back to my previous statement. Ain't the real world so fuckin' great?
Click to expand...
If you used it pre 9/1/22 in ny you were going to jail. You could shoot someone in your house at 2am and you were going to jail. I made peace with that before I began carrying.
 
Saltwater60

Saltwater60

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
36,135
Reaction score
40,586
Location
Western NY
rmosh said:
What's the point in concealed carry if you never use it? A security blanket? If you DO use it you are right back to my previous statement. Ain't the real world so fuckin' great?
Click to expand...
Concealed is concealed while carrying. If you need to use it that is a different story. If you need it then you obviously don’t just leave it in your holster.
Yes this sucks for all of us and we shouldn’t be in this situation under any means but we are. I have re-evaluated what I will and won’t do because of the CCIA. In fact, I doubt I’d do much for a complete stranger these days if I could retreat because of this. It’s a hard decision and situation for all of us.
 
maverick52

maverick52

.223 Rem
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
2,197
Location
Knowhere
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes tells U.S. Supreme Court to shove it

I know this has nothing to do with firearm laws. But it’s related. This article shows the attitude of another democratic AG who basically is defying a scotus ruling in another case. Essentially SCOTUS rulings will continue to be ignored and defied by other government officials who don’t like or agree with the majority. Further evidence that even when we win we lose. The system is broken and we cannot or should depend on the Supreme Court for judicial relief.
 
Last edited:
Saltwater60

Saltwater60

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
36,135
Reaction score
40,586
Location
Western NY
maverick52 said:
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes tells U.S. Supreme Court to shove it

I know this has nothing to do with firearm laws. But it’s related. This article shows the attitude of another democratic AG who basically is defying a scotus ruling in another case. Essentially SCOTUS rulings are I’ll continue to be ignored and defied by other government officials who don’t like or agree with the majority. Further evidence that even when we win we lose. The system is broken and we cannot or should depend on the Supreme Court for judicial relief.
Click to expand...
Protected class? Funny the constitution protects my right to my religion and my right to my guns yet they are ok with me having neither rights.
I don’t care what you do in the privacy of your own home but I can say I don’t want to make a product or a service to you for any reason. I have that right of refusal.
 
Deplorable Me

Deplorable Me

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
24,601
Reaction score
48,247
Location
Western Front; Occupied NY
maverick52 said:
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes tells U.S. Supreme Court to shove it

I know this has nothing to do with firearm laws. But it’s related. This article shows the attitude of another democratic AG who basically is defying a scotus ruling in another case. Essentially SCOTUS rulings will continue to be ignored and defied by other government officials who don’t like or agree with the majority. Further evidence that even when we win we lose. The system is broken and we cannot or should depend on the Supreme Court for judicial relief.
Click to expand...
The implications are terrifying. They pick and choose the laws they want to enforce and make up and enforce ones that aren't. Government by tyranny.
 
Beerman

Beerman

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,092
Reaction score
3,210
Location
Deep in the Adirondacks
If a private business, which is open to the public, can lawfully put up a sign that says “No guns allowed,” thereby depriving me of a Constitutionally protected right, then a private business can do pretty much anything else it wants, including forbidding free speech, barring religious attire, mandatory bag searches, refusal to bake a cake, or design a website.
 
Acer-m14

Acer-m14

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,957
Reaction score
38,562
Location
Livingston
Beerman said:
If a private business, which is open to the public, can lawfully put up a sign that says “No guns allowed,” thereby depriving me of a Constitutionally protected right, then a private business can do pretty much anything else it wants, including forbidding free speech, barring religious attire, mandatory bag searches, refusal to bake a cake, or design a website.
Click to expand...

and they can go out of business too ...

choose wisely

or be like BUD LIGHT
 
Acer-m14

Acer-m14

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,957
Reaction score
38,562
Location
Livingston
Beerman said:
If a private business, which is open to the public, can lawfully put up a sign that says “No guns allowed,” thereby depriving me of a Constitutionally protected right, then a private business can do pretty much anything else it wants, including forbidding free speech, barring religious attire, mandatory bag searches, refusal to bake a cake, or design a website.
Click to expand...

if the govt told the business owner to post any of the above in the window .. that is compelled speech and unconstitutional ...

just wanted to clarify
 
C

CaliberPlus

.45 acp
Messages
441
Reaction score
820
Location
Mannsville, NY
GlockModel29 said:
Today makes 5 months to the day since the 2nd circuit heard oral arguments. Not an effin peep from them. So much for big bad SCOTUS telling them to expedite the case. WTF, I'm absolutely discusted, but certainly not surprised....
Click to expand...
I agree...they broke for the summer the end of JUNE, plenty of time to make ruling. It is for a stay on the crap, not even a "real" ruling.

They come back to sesson in Sept. I cannot find the details of their calendar, whether there is anything about the five lawsuits presented in March. Meanwhile the "law" marches on with people having to show their license for ammo and the specter of NY being the POC for background checks. And the reality of more people just acclimating and going back to sleep.
 
Dr. Evil

Dr. Evil

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
37,832
Reaction score
81,569
Location
My Underground Lair
CaliberPlus said:
I agree...they broke for the summer the end of JUNE, plenty of time to make ruling. It is for a stay on the crap, not even a "real" ruling.

They come back to sesson in Sept. I cannot find the details of their calendar, whether there is anything about the five lawsuits presented in March. Meanwhile the "law" marches on with people having to show their license for ammo and the specter of NY being the POC for background checks. And the reality of more people just acclimating and going back to sleep.
Click to expand...
1692560673828.png
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
30,166
Reaction score
63,694
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
maverick52 said:
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes tells U.S. Supreme Court to shove it

I know this has nothing to do with firearm laws. But it’s related. This article shows the attitude of another democratic AG who basically is defying a scotus ruling in another case. Essentially SCOTUS rulings will continue to be ignored and defied by other government officials who don’t like or agree with the majority. Further evidence that even when we win we lose. The system is broken and we cannot or should depend on the Supreme Court for judicial relief.
Click to expand...
Red states need to adopt that strategy as well.

Imagine if Texas said "we're no longer going to prosecute murder if the victim is here illegally and they are within 10 miles of the border".

There are plenty of people who would read that as "open season, no bag limit". Illegal immigration through Texas would drop to zero overnight.

The left would also lose their shit, but whatever they did to counter it could also be used to enforce other SCOTUS rulings.
 
R

REF

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
1,537
Reaction score
3,333
Location
Nassau
ManualF150 said:
All this hubbub and we are worse off than with the Safe Act. Way to go.

@Dr. Evil has got it right... just keep kicking that can right down the road...
Click to expand...
Yep, I remember a certain member on here who’s no longer here, gave us all shit because Bruen was a HUGE reckoning for the anti-gunners and the CCIA was going down in flames and we all doubted it. Well, here we are a year later and no end in sight to this shit and probably will never be with no recourse from the SC. Inferred we’re all pessimistic Debby downers and we don’t know our asses from our elbows. Nope, I’m just a realist and can see the writing on the wall when it’s right fucking in front of you. Can anyone honestly say they thought NY would just roll over be passive and take their licking? Yeah, didn’t think so
 
Saltwater60

Saltwater60

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
36,135
Reaction score
40,586
Location
Western NY
Acer-m14 said:
i remember when the ccia went to SCOTUS and they told the 2nd circus don't mess up ...

so where are the lawyers that sent this to Scotus ????

shouldn't they be on the phone with them ..
Click to expand...
They are asking us for money and blaming us for this failure because we don’t vote apparently. Oh and give them more money so they can win our rights back but if you don’t vote then they can’t win your rights back. Either way we’re the cause of their failures in their eyes because we didn’t give enough or vote enough and I’m rather sick of this theme.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top