This California Democrat lunatic wants to limit a homeowner’s right to defend themselves from a dangerous intruder.

[livingston]

California is currently a ‘stand your ground’ state, however, a Democrat Assemblyman just introduced a bill that would criminalize self-defense.

California Assemblyman and Democrat Caucus Chair Rich Chavez Zbur introduced AB 1333 which seeks to limit a homeowner’s right to defend their family and home from an intruder.
This Democrat lunatic wants to limit a homeowner’s right to defend themselves from a dangerous intruder.
“This bill would eliminate certain circumstances under which homicide is justifiable, including, among others, in defense of a habitation or property. The bill would additionally clarify circumstances in which homicide is not justifiable, including, among others, when a person uses more force than necessary to defend against a danger,” according to California Legislative Information.

People Outraged After California Democrat Introduces Bill that Criminalizes Self-Defense – AB 1333 Limits Homeowner’s Right to Defend Self, Family and Home From Intruder * The Gateway Pundit * by Cristina Laila

A controversial new bill introduced by California Democrat Rich Chavez Zbur seeks to redefine self-defense laws, raising significant concerns about homeowners'…

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Criticalt]

Luckily, even MOST anti gun leftist jurors would not agree in my opinion.
A law is only good if a jury of your peers agrees.
You can get away with 1st degree capital murder, that was caught on video if 12 people agree the victim deserved it.
There have been several pedophiles killed by a parent, and walked away free, or a bit of probation.
It's not always how you defend yourself, but why you defended yourself.

 

[Defilade]

Private property. Null and Void.

 

[Koz]

In a perfect world his house would be robbed every day until his term is up and maybe beyond.

 

[Cooolone]

The RIGHT to DEFENSE has been established by the SCOTUS, nothing to see here!

 

[libertysnake]

Jury nullification, afaik, has been upheld by the supreme court.

 

[tirwin1]

Welcome to Britain. And people said it couldn't come here.

 

[Acer-m14]

I think they tried that a few years ago .. the bill didn't go any ware ..

 

[Acer-m14]

I'll just leave it to your ideas of the video below ..

don't forget to call 811

 

[Grimscale]

The RIGHT to DEFENSE has been established by the SCOTUS, nothing to see here!

There's plenty to see here.
These socialist States continue to ignore established SCOTUS decisions on a regular basis.
New infringing laws are written, voted for, and signed in these bastions of tyranny every year. Laws that WILL jack up American citizens who only seek to exercise their Rights.
SCOTUS doesn't care that their decisions are ignored. They won't even reinforce their decisions when similar laws come up before them. Nor will they place sanctions on rogue judges who ignore their precedent.
And they, and the .gov, sure as hell haven't started arresting these tyrannical assholes who, with the stroke of a pen, infringe on the rights of millions.

It's almost as if they are all waiting for We The People to take matters into our own hands in an effort to re-establish our Rights, just so they have more justification on eliminating them.

 

[livingston]

There's plenty to see here.
These socialist States continue to ignore established SCOTUS decisions on a regular basis.
New infringing laws are written, voted for, and signed in these bastions of tyranny every year. Laws that WILL jack up American citizens who only seek to exercise their Rights.
SCOTUS doesn't care that their decisions are ignored. They won't even reinforce their decisions when similar laws come up before them. Nor will they place sanctions on rogue judges who ignore their precedent.
And they, and the .gov, sure as hell haven't started arresting these tyrannical assholes who, with the stroke of a pen, infringe on the rights of millions.

It's almost as if they are all waiting for We The People to take matters into our own hands in an effort to re-establish our Rights, just so they have more justification on eliminating them.

And the safe act and safe act 2 still stands with more laws piled on... Like... register every bullet you bought with the state boy....

 

[Phazer]

There have been several pedophiles killed by a parent, and walked away free, or a bit of probation.

Pedophiles are not people. So, no issue there.

We should be allowed to use convicted pedophiles and rapists (who have either confessed or who have exhausted all legal appeals) for sighting in new optics.

 

[Cooolone]

There's plenty to see here.
These socialist States continue to ignore established SCOTUS decisions on a regular basis.
New infringing laws are written, voted for, and signed in these bastions of tyranny every year. Laws that WILL jack up American citizens who only seek to exercise their Rights.
SCOTUS doesn't care that their decisions are ignored. They won't even reinforce their decisions when similar laws come up before them. Nor will they place sanctions on rogue judges who ignore their precedent.
And they, and the .gov, sure as hell haven't started arresting these tyrannical assholes who, with the stroke of a pen, infringe on the rights of millions.

It's almost as if they are all waiting for We The People to take matters into our own hands in an effort to re-establish our Rights, just so they have more justification on eliminating them.

Nah...

Like I said, nothing at all to see! I have no desire, nor will I probably ever enter the State of California, so their ridiculous delusional Utopia won't ever affect me.

The fact that Unconstitutional Laws are even voted on and passed in these jurisdictions just reinforce their delirium...

Like the NY judge who only partially rules against the CCIA while proclaiming the entire thing in all probability being unconstitutional, yet deflected and submitted to the Progressives rather than rule correctly in its entirety!

The majority of States, now 29 of them are in their right minds. There's more to yet turn. But I'm under no illusion the 9 states that will never surrender and submit to the will of the people... Ever!

 

[GOPerfect]

Private property. Null and Void.

This is not Null and it is not void in many places around the Country.

 

[Modean]

The RIGHT to DEFENSE has been established by the SCOTUS, nothing to see here!

Yet here in New Yorkistan we have a duty to retreat rather than defend our homes.

 

[Grimscale]

Yet here in New Yorkistan we have a duty to retreat rather than defend our homes.

I thought "duty to retreat" only came into affect when you were outside your home?

 

[spat]

I thought "duty to retreat" only came into affect when you were outside your home?

There is a big gulf between what the law says and how prosecutors apply it.

In practice, the level of "castle doctrine" in NY varies drastically depending on what county you are in, despite the law being identical in all of them.

Prosecutorial discretion is an abomination.