If the Communists have demonstrated anything at all, it is that they are utterly ruthless and lack all respect for America or any law.
Upcoming Midterms - How concerned are you
- Thread starter zorro
- Start date
If the Communists have demonstrated anything at all, it is that they are utterly ruthless and lack all respect for America or any law.
96coal449
.308 Win
They respect the law of their masters.
They only respond to force.
So, I am not concerned at all.
The Republican party will in fact lose the House. No doubt in my mind.
The Republicans will hold the Senate. No doubt about this either.
The House will get nothing done because they will be too busy trying to impeach Trump and all on his team.
Because the House will get nothing else done, the Senate will accomplish anything either.
Come back and read this post in 10 months....
The Republican party will in fact lose the House. No doubt in my mind.
The Republicans will hold the Senate. No doubt about this either.
The House will get nothing done because they will be too busy trying to impeach Trump and all on his team.
Because the House will get nothing else done, the Senate will accomplish anything either.
Come back and read this post in 10 months....
Just because a person is married to a person out of their race does not mean they cannot be a racist.
Just saying.
Lots of different peoples/ races to hate.
spat
.950 JDJ
To be fair, Lincolns actions are the origin of much of the loss of freedom we suffer from today.
spat
.950 JDJ
The real question is "How is that different from the last year".
It's not like congress is actually doing anything useful now.
Trump doesn't need to suspend hebeus corpus to arrest criminal politicians. There are plenty of laws on the books that have been broken by these asshats.
And all it takes is one to show the rest their days are numbered.
And "qualified immunity" isn't their "get out of jail free" card. There's a reason it's "qualified". It only applies to actions taken in the course of their duties.
Violating the Constitution is NOT one of their duties!
And all it takes is one to show the rest their days are numbered.
And "qualified immunity" isn't their "get out of jail free" card. There's a reason it's "qualified". It only applies to actions taken in the course of their duties.
Violating the Constitution is NOT one of their duties!
They have blinded their ranks to fact that the Laws the"evil" Republicans are enforcing, the ones they so diametrically oppose were written by their own party.
I do not disagree.
And in many respects he was a terrible president.
Across the Pond, in England, slavery was abolished decades earlier. The government simply purchased the slaves, at market rate or higher, and freed them.
But Lincoln was extremely ambitious, and married an honest-to-god psychopath because she came with a large dowry. And three of his four sons died.
The Lincoln wanted a distraction from his personal demons. He wanted war.
He refused all Prisoner swaps. The horrors of Andersonville could have been avoided.
Some sources report Lincoln loved to hear the reports of the atrocities Sherman and others were up to across the South.
For better or worse, Lincoln wished to repatriate all slaves. We can debate on the ethics of that, but it would have been a practical solution to many issues.
Without Lincoln's War, and the near elimination of an entire generation of American men, there would have been no need for Ellis Island and the importation of millions of Europeans. Many of us, myself included, would have remained serfs.
Trump, on the other hand, is going to absurd lengths to coddle our Communist Opponents. He needs to take a page from Lincoln's playbook.
Trump just came out and said he wants to make things less affordable. So there's that lol.
PA Guns & Ammo
.45 acp
Republicans are going to lose the house and lose many seats in the senate. Republicans are not nearly as organized as the democrats when it comes to mid-term elections. Most republicans will sit home. Sorry but Republicans are going to lose big this year.
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
Republicans ran a flake (pretty much was the candidate because she's the mayors wife and she was communications director for a small mobile phone company with great commercials and a huge ad budget) who ran a poor campaign (in spite of spending money) against a union boss Air Force Vet who sounds like he's farther right than most rinos. Go figure.
Not sure the Nassau County Executive likely running for Governor of NY is farther right than the Dem who one.
Last edited:
C3D
.338 Win Mag
We're screwed, Supreme Court just allowed the Newsome redistricting plan to stand and California shifted 5 seats to D.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Chuck Schumer: SAVE Act Requiring ID to Vote ‘Is Jim Crow 2.0’
Thursday on MS NOW’s “Morning Joe,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act was “Jim Crow 2.0.”Schumer said, “It’s Jim Crow 2.0, and I called it Jim Crow 2.0, and the right wing went nuts all over the Internet. That’s because they know it’s true. What they’re trying to do here is the same thing that was done in the South for decades to prevent people of color from voting. For instance, if you change — you’re a woman who got married and changed your last name, you won’t be able to show ID and you’ll be discriminated against. If you can’t find a birth certificate, or a proper ID, you’ll be discriminated against. This is vicious and nasty. And I said to our Republican colleagues, it will not pass the Senate. You will not get a single Democratic vote in the Senate. We’re not reviving Jim Crow all over the country. And when the American people hear what exactly it is doing and what its intent is doing, they’re going to be against it as well.”
Chuck Schumer: SAVE Act Requiring ID to Vote 'Is Jim Crow 2.0'
Thursday on MS NOW's "Morning Joe," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act was "Jim Crow 2.0." | Clips
www.breitbart.com
Then, by extension, requiring ID for ANY Right is part of the Jim Crow laws and should be abolished.
Can't have it both ways.
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Very!
Robin
Robin
MothMan
.338 Win Mag
To old to worry anymore. More concerned with my funeral arrangements.
PS Horrible Horchul will be re-elected
PS Horrible Horchul will be re-elected
Brawny71
.357 mag
We will be told how to feel, how to vote, and what the dangers are over and over, every 15 minutes. We keep allowing ourselves to give in to fear and panic (If it Bleeds it Reads is a media ethos). NONE of the options presented to you will be the best option. But to walk away from the process is exactly the agenda being pushed passively. Left or Right; there is a complete lack of action. Frankly the campaign I would support is "Vote Out All Incumbents" as they have violated the public trust. Lack of accountability (To include even an accounting of who/what/ where) at all levels of tax money and birth to end of life cycle, lack of fixing known conditions (immigration process, over staffing of all fed/ state offices). The legislative branch is defunct but we are led into the Us vs Them argument. The once the election is over, no accountability. If you pay for a service and the service is not provided, you have legal avenues. Yet a lack of accounting, tracking, and service to THE PEOPLE apparently is acceptable.
With all the dramatics and fantasy, Chuck should consider a career change on Broadway...not even his die-hard supporters give a fuck what upchuck has to say anymore.Chuck Schumer: SAVE Act Requiring ID to Vote ‘Is Jim Crow 2.0’
Thursday on MS NOW’s “Morning Joe,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act was “Jim Crow 2.0.”
Schumer said, “It’s Jim Crow 2.0, and I called it Jim Crow 2.0, and the right wing went nuts all over the Internet. That’s because they know it’s true. What they’re trying to do here is the same thing that was done in the South for decades to prevent people of color from voting. For instance, if you change — you’re a woman who got married and changed your last name, you won’t be able to show ID and you’ll be discriminated against. If you can’t find a birth certificate, or a proper ID, you’ll be discriminated against. This is vicious and nasty. And I said to our Republican colleagues, it will not pass the Senate. You will not get a single Democratic vote in the Senate. We’re not reviving Jim Crow all over the country. And when the American people hear what exactly it is doing and what its intent is doing, they’re going to be against it as well.”
Chuck Schumer: SAVE Act Requiring ID to Vote 'Is Jim Crow 2.0'
Thursday on MS NOW's "Morning Joe," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act was "Jim Crow 2.0." | Clips
2WheelGnnr
6.5 Creedmoor
I'm always worried!!!!
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
Not concerned at all. We're too far gone. No matter who's in office.