There are a LOT more laws that so far, I am not seeing any suits against. I am hoping NYSRPA is going to go whole hog.
You seem obsessed with NYSRPA..
Hahahhahahhaa
There are a LOT more laws that so far, I am not seeing any suits against. I am hoping NYSRPA is going to go whole hog.
No, just going by what I am reading. Do you see anything about the other laws?
Hush, before you bruen our chances!I want to see the name "Bruen" on the losing end of so many lawsuits it becomes a meme...
..dude, you just got Bruened...
...fucking rain Bruened our picnic...
...Brandon Bruened this country....
...thank God the NRA didn't Bruen Bruen...
Sigh, no like I said, based on what I have read. GOA seem to be focusing on handgun legislation. No fixation and why,even if there was, do you have to be so grumpy about it? This is a crap sandwich no matter how you slice it.
I want to see the name "Bruen" on the losing end of so many lawsuits it becomes a meme...
..dude, you just got Bruened...
...fucking rain Bruened our picnic...
...Brandon Bruened this country....
...thank God the NRA didn't Bruen Bruen...
What heil hochul did, as an extension of what Monkeyface Partytits did, with the constant "renewals" (shortened under der female fuhrer) and now the overbearing "requirements" has pushed what they could have kept into the realm of "onerous". They need to name any other Right that has such requirements...not that it would excuse what they are doing.As long as they are shall issue and not too onerous
Probably just another 8 years before the whole mess is worked out. Getting closerWith Bruen now in the back pocket, I've switched to cautiously optimistic rather than outright pessimistic.
I just read this. It reminds me of the typical bullshit you hear when dealing with a government bureaucracy.Vanchoff V. James (Filed 7-12-22) update.
NY has responded saying Plantiffs have no standing because you can still buy AR15
View attachment 170243
View attachment 170244
This is all also coming from the same office that claims upstate pistol permits don't expire.I just read this. It reminds me of the typical bullshit you hear when dealing with a government bureaucracy.
Like:
Oh, no, I'm sorry but you're at the wrong location...
No, that's not us...
No, I can't help you with that...
No, that office is closed, and I don't know when they will be back...
No, I don't know anything about that...
No,...what is it you want again...
No, that's not my job...
And on, and on, and on... Anything to avoid taking responsibility. Fuckers!
Hey Letetia, they are representing all of us you idiot.Vanchoff V. James (Filed 7-12-22) update.
NY has responded saying Plantiffs have no standing because you can still buy AR15
View attachment 170243
View attachment 170244
Has the plaintiff (GOA and Antonyuk) filed their response to NYS's opposition? I thought this is due by today and can't find it on Courtlistener.com. The last thing that shows is Giffords BS from 8/17Tomorrow (8-23-22) at 10:30am
View attachment 170233
They don't expire. They'll just take them away if you don't recertify.This is all also coming from the same office that claims upstate pistol permits don't expire.
I don't believe GOA has to respond. They were the ones that filed the complaint.Has the plaintiff (GOA and Antonyuk) filed their response to NYS's opposition? I thought this is due by today and can't find it on Courtlistener.com. The last thing that shows is Giffords BS from 8/17
Only those granted before 2013 when unSAFE set a 5 year renewal period.They don't expire. They'll just take them away if you don't recertify.![]()
Has the plaintiff (GOA and Antonyuk) filed their response to NYS's opposition? I thought this is due by today and can't find it on Courtlistener.com. The last thing that shows is Giffords BS from 8/17
I don't believe GOA has to respond. They were the ones that filed the complaint.
Thanks. I am looking forward to seeing all the inaccuracies and outright falsehoods and lies get called outThey filled today. I'll see if I can find it
I think there are two different lawsuits being discussed here?
The Antonyuk v. Bruen (1:22-cv-00734) lawsuit is being heard tomorrow, 08/23 in Syracuse, and Judge Suddaby (Chief Justice of the Northern District of NY) gave the plaintiffs until today to submit additional papers to detail why their suit has standing (because Letitia James pulled the same bullshit out of her ugly fat ass in both Antonyuk v Bruen, and Vanchoff v James to say that they didn't have standing either).
Vanchoff V. James is being heard by Judge Brown of the Eastern District Court of New York. (See above)
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong on this.
Also, I am very interested to see what the plantiffs in Antonyuk file with the court by their deadline at 5PM today.
Be advised that there was an amended order sent down from the judge this past Friday the 19th, for a total of two orders on the same day. First order said that he wanted plaintiffs to give examples such as a store or gas station....gave the plaintiffs until today to submit additional papers to detail why their suit has standing (because Letitia James pulled the same bullshit out of her ugly fat ass in both Antonyuk v Bruen, and Vanchoff v James to say that they didn't have standing either).
Also, I am very interested to see what the plantiffs in Antonyuk file with the court by their deadline at 5PM today.