Ok, my earlier point was it seems they identified him by name using an illegal gun registry. Unless they knew him before he got on the roof, and are throwing an illegal database out there to distract.
That "Bound Book" is not recorded in it's entirety unless and until the Licensee surrenders the Licenses, then an ATF Agent comes and collects the Licenses, Bound Books, and 4473's, from there they go to West Virginia and are scanned into their Data Base (but that's not "registration") the only other time those records are examined are during an audit/investigation/spot-check...they don't just come in and start making copies of everything, especially for a Registration, which is prohibited by Federal Law.
Lawfully manufactured and transferred guns ARE tracked at every point, UNTIL the end purchaser and if that end person disposes of it (sell/trade/give away/...) there's a good chance that the end of knowing who owns it...falls off the Radar so to say.
I am saying the bound book system *itself* is a database.
It does seem quite suspicious that the serial number of the gun was the fastest way for them to put a name to the corpse.
The story goes he had no id, and no criminal record so no fingerprints to compare to. And with thousands of people at this event it would be impossible to find his car until nearly everyone was gone and it was one of the last remaining cars.
If a gun registry scares you, think about this:
Not that it scares me, it angers me that it's supposed to be prohibited by law if they have it anyway. And I'm under No Illusion that we have any privacy at all anymore. Whether it's easy pass or random cameras that the government has all over the place, along with facial recognition software already being implemented in this country, privacy from the government is dead now that we are in the technology age.
Law enforcement in general has an attitude that since they're the ones who decide what laws get enforced and against whom, that they can ignore any of them that they find too inconvenient.
Assuming a shutter speed of 1/8,000 to 1/10,000 second would be needed to capture the "bullet" in the image, it's almost a certainty this photo was edited to include the projectile. Why would the photographer be maxing out the shutter speed and continuously blasting away at 30 fps or whatever the max frame rate of the camera is, on a stationary subject giving a speech?
This article is either poorly written or poorly written on purpose.
This exists already and is publicly known that its used in this way. You can thank "real ID" for making that happen.
theconservativetreehouse.com
With all the commercial DNA databases it take no time at all to make a match if mom or dad are in one. But I think we can all agree it probably was not his dental records
YetJust for reference………………
Cheatle didnt kill herself
Any body make out what there saying about the water tower in the background radio traffic?
Not buying it. the slope roof didn't work and they're trying another angle.Now they are admitting incompetence as a cover.
creativedestructionmedia.com
The only reason was to catch that award winning shot of trumps head exploding
Agent in video states that shooter arrived on bike and sniper had pics and observed him getting off bike
